Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ramus, F.

Publications and source records attributed to Ramus, F..

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Adaptive compensation of arcuate fasciculus lateralization in developmental dyslexia

Previous studies have reported anomalies in the arcuate fasciculus (AF) lateralization in developmental dyslexia (DD). Still, the relationship between AF lateralization and literacy skills in DD remains largely unknown. The purpose of our study is to investigate the relationship between the lateralization of the AF anterior segment (AFAS), AF long segment (AFLS), and AF posterior segment (AFPS) in connection to literacy skills in DD. The participants included 26 children with dyslexia and 31 age-matched children in the control group. High angular diffusion imaging, combined with spherical deconvolution tractography, was used to reconstruct the AF. Connectivity measures of hindrance-modulated oriented anisotropy (HMOA) were computed for each of the three segments of the AF: anterior segment (AFAS), long segment (AFLS), and posterior segment (AFPS). The lateralization index (LI) of each AF segment was calculated by (right HMOA - left HMOA) / (right HMOA + left HMOA). Results showed that the LIs of AFAS and AFLS were positively correlated with reading accuracy in children with dyslexia. Specifically, the LI of AFAS was positively correlated with text and nonword reading accuracy, while the LI of AFLS accounted for word reading accuracy. The results suggest adaptive compensation of arcuate fasciculus lateralization in developmental dyslexia and functional dissociation of the anterior segment and long segment in the compensation.

neuroscience↗

Brain Volumes, Thicknesses, and Surface Areas as Mediators of Genetic Factors and Childhood Adversity on Intelligence

Although genetic and environmental factors influence general intelligence (g-factor), few studies examined the neuroanatomical measures mediating environmental and genetic effects on intelligence. Therefore, we investigate the brain volumes, cortical mean thicknesses, and cortical surface areas mediating the effects of the g-factor polygenic score (gPGS) and childhood adversity on the g-factor in the UK Biobank. We first identified the global and regional brain measures for the mediation models that contribute to the g-factor independently of global brain size and regional associations. Most regions contributed to the g-factor through global brain size. Parieto-Frontal Integration Theory (P-FIT) regions were not more associated with the g-factor than non-PFIT regions. Adjusting for global brain size and regional associations, only a few regions, such as the right olfactory sulcus and the right mediodorsal thalamic nuclei volumes, the right orbital inferior frontal gyrus surface area, and the anterior cingulate gyrus mean thicknesses, predicted intelligence and were included in the mediation analyses. We conducted mediation analyses on global measures, regional volumes, mean thicknesses, and surface areas, separately. Total brain volume mediated 7.04% of the gPGS effect on the g-factor and 2.50% of childhood adversitys effect on the g-factor. In comparison, the fraction of the gPGS and childhood adversitys effects mediated by individual regional volumes, surfaces, and mean thicknesses was 10-15 times smaller. Our findings suggest that genetic and environmental effects on general intelligence must be mediated to a larger extent by other structural brain properties. Significance StatementGenes and environmental factors, such as childhood adversity, influence our cognitive abilities via the brain. Our results show that genetic and environmental effects on intelligence are mediated to some extent by neuroanatomical properties. However, we find that global brain measures (e.g., total brain volume) are the largest mediators and that regional volumes, surfaces, and mean thicknesses only mediated a fraction of a persons genetic predisposition to intelligence and childhood adversitys effect on intelligence. This suggests that genetic and environmental effects on general intelligence are to a large extent mediated by other kinds of brain structural properties.

neuroscience↗

White matter connectivity in uncinate fasciculus accounts for visual attention span in developmental dyslexia

The present study aimed to investigate the role of connectivity disruptions in two fiber pathways, the uncinate fasciculus (UF) and the frontal aslant tract (FAT), in developmental dyslexia and determine the relationship between the connectivity of these pathways and behavioral performance in children with dyslexia. A total of 26 French children with dyslexia and 31 age-matched control children were included. Spherical deconvolution tractography was used to reconstruct the two fiber pathways. Hindrance-modulated oriented anisotropy (HMOA) was used to measure the connectivity of each fiber pathway in both hemispheres. The boys with dyslexia showed reduced HMOA in the UF compared to control boys, but this difference was not observed in girls. Furthermore, HMOA of the UF correlated with individual differences in the visual attention span in participants with dyslexia. All significant results found in HMOA of the UF were verified in fractional anisotropy (FA) of the UF using standard diffusion imaging model. This study suggests a differential sex effect on the connectivity disruption in the UF in developmental dyslexia. It also indicates that the UF may play an essential role in the visual attention span deficit in developmental dyslexia. Significance StatementThis study presents the first account of connectivity disruption in the uncinate fasciculus in developmental dyslexia. In particular, this connectivity disruption only appears in boys with dyslexia but not in girls with dyslexia. We also show that the connectivity of the uncinate fasciculus accounts for individual differences in the visual attention span in children with dyslexia, expanding the current understanding of the function of the uncinate fasciculus.

neuroscience↗

Comparing Brain Asymmetries Independently of Brain Size

Studies examining cerebral asymmetries typically divide the L-R Measure (e.g., Left- Right Volume) by the L+R Measure to obtain an Asymmetry Index (AI). However, contrary to widespread belief, such a division fails to render the AI independent from the L+R Measure and/or from total brain size. As a result, variations in brain size may bias correlation estimates with the AI or group differences in AI. We investigated how to analyze brain asymmetries in to distinguish global from regional effects, and report unbiased group differences in cerebral asymmetries. We analyzed the extent to which the L+R Measure, Total Cerebral Measure (TCM, e.g., Total Brain Volume), and L-R TCM predict regional asymmetries. As a case study, we assessed the consequences of omitting each of these predictors on the magnitude and significance of sex differences in asymmetries. We found that the L+R Measure, the TCM, and the L-R TCM predicted the AI of more than 89% of regions and that their relationships were generally linear. Removing any of these predictors changed the significance of sex differences in 33% of regions and the magnitude of sex differences across 13-42% of regions. Although we generally report similar sex and age effects on cerebral asymmetries to those of previous large-scale studies, properly adjusting for regional and global brain size revealed additional sex and age effects on brain asymmetry. Highlights- The typical Asymmetry Index (AI) scales with the size of a region and brain size. - Omitting the Left+Right Measure influences reported sex differences in asymmetries. - Omitting brain size or asymmetry influences reported sex differences in asymmetries. - We report sex and age effects on AIs independent of regional and global brain size.

neuroscience↗

Neuroanatomical Norms in the UK Biobank: The Impact of Allometric Scaling, Sex, and Age.

Few neuroimaging studies are sufficiently large to adequately describe population-wide variations. This studys primary aim was to generate neuroanatomical norms and individual markers that consider age, sex, and brain size, from 629 cerebral measures in the UK Biobank (N = 40 028). The secondary aim was to examine the effects and interactions of sex, age, and brain allometry - the non-linear scaling relationship between a region and brain size (e.g., Total Brain Volume) across cerebral measures. Allometry was a common property of brain volumes, thicknesses, and surface areas (83%) and was largely stable across age and sex. Sex differences occurred in 67% of cerebral measures (median |{beta}|= 0.13): 37% of regions were larger in males and 30% in females. Brain measures (49%) generally decreased with age, although aging effects varied across regions and sexes. While models with an allometric or linear covariate adjustment for brain size yielded similar significant effects, omitting brain allometry influenced reported sex differences in variance. This large scale-study advances our understanding of age, sex, and brain allometrys impact on brain structure and provides data for future UK Biobank studies to identify the cerebral regions that covary with specific phenotypes, independently of sex, age, and brain size. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=77 SRC="FIGDIR/small/422684v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (31K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@405c3borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1673e3corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@126fee4org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@128545b_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG HighlightsO_LIWe created neuroanatomical norms and individual markers for the UK Biobank (N=40 028) C_LIO_LIAllometry was common across 83% of brain volumes, thicknesses, and surface areas C_LIO_LI67% of regions differed between sexes: 37% were larger in males and 30% in females C_LIO_LIOmitting brain allometry influenced reported sex differences in variance C_LIO_LI49% of regions declined with age, with variations across regions and sexes C_LI

neuroscience↗

Shared anomalies in cortical reading networks in Chinese and French dyslexic children

Are the brain mechanisms of reading acquisition similar across writing systems? And do similar brain anomalies underlie reading disabilities in alphabetic and ideographic reading systems? In a cross-cultural paradigm, we measured the fMRI responses to words, faces and houses of 96 Chinese and French 10-year-old children, half of whom struggle with reading. We observed a reading circuit which was strikingly similar across languages and consisting of the left fusiform gyrus, superior temporal gyrus/sulcus, precentral and middle frontal gyri. Activations in some of these areas were modulated either by language or by reading ability, but without interaction between those factors. In various regions previously associated with dyslexia, reading difficulty affected activation similarly in Chinese and French readers, including the middle frontal gyrus, a region previously described as specifically altered in Chinese. Our analyses reveal a large degree of cross-cultural invariance in the neural correlates of reading acquisition and reading disabilities.

neuroscience↗

Genome Wide Association Scan identifies new variants associated with a cognitive predictor of dyslexia.

Developmental dyslexia (DD) is one of the most prevalent learning disorders among children and is characterized by deficits in different cognitive skills, including reading, spelling, short term memory and others. To help unravel the genetic basis of these skills, we conducted a Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS), including nine cohorts of reading-impaired and typically developing children of European ancestry, recruited across different countries (N=2,562-3,468).\n\nWe observed a genome-wide significant effect (p<1x10-8) on rapid automatized naming of letters (RANlet) for variants on 18q12.2 within MIR924HG (micro-RNA 924 host gene; p = 4.73x10-9), and a suggestive association on 8q12.3 within NKAIN3 (encoding a cation transporter; p = 2.25 x10-8). RAN represents one of the best universal predictors of reading fluency across orthographies and linkage to RAN has been previously reported within CELF4 (18q12.2), a gene highly expressed in the fetal brain which is co-expressed with NKAIN3 and predicted to be a target of MIR924. These findings suggest new candidate DD susceptibility genes and provide insights into the genetics and neurobiology of dyslexia.

genomics↗