Biology subjects

Ramola, R.

Publications and source records attributed to Ramola, R..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

On the state of protein function prediction: a report on the fourth CAFA challenge

BackgroundThe Critical Assessment of Functional Annotation (CAFA) is a community effort held to understand the field of computational protein function prediction. Every three years, since 2010, the organizers initiate an experiment to collect function predictions on a large set of proteins and then evaluate the performance of predicting methods on a subset of proteins that have accumulated experimental annotations between the submission deadline and the evaluation time. CAFA provides an independent and rigorous assessment of the current state of the art, thus leveling the playing field, highlighting successes, revealing bottlenecks, and offering a forum for the exchange of ideas in protein science. Here, we report the results of the fourth CAFA experiment (CAFA4). ResultsCAFA4 featured the participation of 148 methods from 70 research groups on a total of 46,205 unique proteins over a 5-year annotation accumulation phase, the longest in any CAFA. In a comparison across CAFA2-CAFA4 methods, the prediction of Gene Ontology (GO) terms has clearly improved across all three GO aspects and traditional evaluation settings. While not achieving the first rank, several CAFA2 and CAFA3 methods featured in the top ten methods in many evaluations, suggesting that earlier methods still hold relevance. The performance is weaker in the newly introduced "partial knowledge" evaluation category (proteins with experimental annotations before submission deadline that gained additional annotations in the same GO aspect during the annotation accumulation phase), highlighting the need for a new class of methods. The rankings of the methods were stable over the years in traditional evaluation settings, but less so in the new partial knowledge evaluation. Overall, the field continues to progress with some influx of new participants. Sustained efforts will be necessary to substantially advance it.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2026

Advances in protein function prediction from the fifth CAFA challenge

The Critical Assessment of Functional Annotation (CAFA) is a long-standing community effort to independently assess computational methods for protein function prediction, to highlight well-performing methodologies, to identify bottlenecks in the field, and to provide a forum for the dissemination of results and exchange of ideas. In its fifth round (CAFA5) of triennial challenges, a partnership with Kaggle Inc. facilitated participation from a large community of data scientists and computational biologists through a competitive prospective challenge on the crowdsourcing platform. In this work, we present an in-depth analysis of the submitted predictions and report improvements in accuracy over all methods from the previous CAFA challenges. We further introduce a new evaluation setting for proteins with pre-existing (incomplete) annotations and identify the need for methods that better leverage existing annotations to predict those that will be discovered later. Finally, we characterize the prospective evaluation framework by examining performance on a strict set of unpublished annotations and across intermediate database releases. Our results indicate that recent developments in the field, such as the availability of protein language models and accurately predicted 3D structures, as well as the growth of experimental annotations through biocuration, have all contributed to performance improvements. 1

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2022

The field of protein function prediction as viewed by different domain scientists

Experimental biologists, biocurators, and computational biologists all play a role in characterizing a proteins function. The discovery of protein function in the laboratory by experimental scientists is the foundation of our knowledge about proteins. Experimental findings are compiled in knowledge-bases by biocurators to provide standardized, readily accessible, and computationally amenable information. Computational biologists train their methods using these data to predict protein function and guide subsequent experiments. To understand the state of affairs in this ecosystem, centered here around protein function prediction, we surveyed scientists from these three constituent communities. Our objective was to understand their views on this research area, including the importance of the problem, the usefulness of the methods, the bottlenecks in the field, and the level of interaction between the communities. We show that the three core communities have common but also idiosyncratic perspectives on the field. Most strikingly, experimentalists rarely use modern prediction software, but when presented with predictions, report many to be surprising and useful. Ontologies appear to be highly valued by biocurators, less so by experimentalists and computational biologists, yet controlled vocabularies bridge the communities and simplify the prediction task. Additionally, many software tools are not readily accessible and the predictions presented to the users can be broad and uninformative. To meet both the social and technical challenges in the field, a more productive and meaningful interaction between members of the core communities is necessary.

bioinformatics↗