Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ramezanpour, H.

Publications and source records attributed to Ramezanpour, H..

10 recordsLinked to original sources

Overcoming the skull barrier for noninvasive transcranial functional ultrasound imaging in marmosets

Functional ultrasound (fUS) imaging enables high-resolution mapping of brain hemodynamics but is limited in primates by acoustic attenuation of the cranium. With topical application of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), we were able to visualized cortical and deep vasculature in marmoset brains. We localized robust, stimulus-locked blood flow changes in cortical and subcortical regions contralateral to peripheral tactile stimulation. Beyond stimulus-evoked responses, resting-state cerebral blood flow also varied with the depth of isoflurane anesthesia. These findings advance translational ultrasound neuroimaging by offering a non-destructive alternative to a craniotomy.

neuroscience↗

Visual Attention in Peripersonal Space

Bringing the hand near a visual stimulus enhances visual processing. This effect is linked to peripersonal space (PPS), the body-centered region where visual and proprioceptive information interact. Despite extensive behavioral evidence, the neural basis of this interaction in early visual cortex remains unclear. In this study, we investigated how hand proximity modulates orientation selectivity in area V2 by recording single-neuron responses from two rhesus monkeys. The monkeys performed a fixation task while their hand was positioned near a visual stimulus while either being visible or occluded, and compared with when the hand was away from the stimulus. When the near hand was visible, neural firing rates in V2 were significantly higher, accompanied by sharper orientation tuning. In contrast, occluding the hand broadened orientation tuning compared to when the hand was away. These effects emerged rapidly after stimulus onset and were coherent across the population, demonstrating that PPS is actively prioritized during visual processing. Together, the findings reveal two complementary (feedback) signals in V2: a congruence-driven enhancement when visual and proprioceptive inputs align, and a mismatch-driven suppression when they conflict, indicating that V2 integrates multisensory cues to encode PPS and support action-relevant visual processing.

neuroscience↗

Deep Brain Ultrasound Augments Human Attention

BackgroundDeep brain ultrasound offers a novel means of modulating human cognition by noninvasively targeting subcortical structures that were previously accessible only through invasive procedures. While decades of research have mapped cortical circuits of attention, the causal roles of deep hubs such as the basal ganglia and thalamus remain poorly understood in the healthy human brain. Objectives/HypothesisTo test whether low intensity transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS) of two nodes in the basal ganglia-thalamic network, the globus pallidus internus (GPi) and the pulvinar, causally alters visual attention. We hypothesized that TUS-induced modulations in attentional performance would be site specific, reflecting distinct circuit functions. ResultsAcross sessions, focal TUS accelerated reaction time in a visual search task, indicating augmented attention. Reaction time improvements were observed after stimulation relative to baseline. A dissociation emerged across sites: both GPi and pulvinar enhanced reaction times, but pulvinar yielded more robust benefits for target present trials at peripheral eccentricities, and improved search efficiency in the same trials. ConclusionsThese findings provide causal evidence that human attentional control can be steered at deep subcortical sites. TUS offers a practical approach for dissecting circuit level contributions to cognition and a potential noninvasive avenue for enhancing attention and other cognitive or affective functions.

neuroscience↗

Facial expression discrimination emerges from neural subspaces shared with detection and identity

Understanding how the human brain decodes facial expressions remains a fundamental challenge, requiring computational models that tightly connect neural responses to behavior. Here, we demonstrate that rhesus macaques provide a unique and powerful animal model to uncover the neural computations behind human facial expression discrimination, bridging critical gaps between behavior, neural activity, and computational theory. Despite the challenges of establishing reliable behavioral paradigms in macaques, we developed a robust discrimination task spanning six emotional categories, yielding strong, image-by-image behavioral correspondence between macaques and humans. By systematically comparing artificial neural networks (ANNs) to macaque behavior and IT neural data, we found that traditional action unit-based models fail to capture image-level behavioral structure, while ANNs with IT-like internal representations outperform all others. Neural recordings showed that the specific IT population responses (70-100 ms) carried the strongest predictive power for facial expression discrimination, underscoring the primacy of feedforward codes in guiding behavior. Expression coding in IT was significantly shaped by face-selective neurons that also encoded identity. This convergence points to a shared functional subspace in IT, where stable (identity) and dynamic (expression) information coexist along overlapping dimensions. Such an architecture moves beyond the classical view of segregated pathways, revealing a general coding principle by which IT flexibly supports multiple socially relevant functions within a common representational geometry.

neuroscience↗

The Impact of Scene Context on Visual Object Recognition: Comparing Humans, Monkeys, and Computational Models

During natural vision, we rarely see objects in isolation but rather embedded in rich and complex contexts. Understanding how the brain recognizes objects in natural scenes by integrating contextual information remains a key challenge. To elucidate neural mechanisms compatible with human visual processing, we need an animal model that behaves similarly to humans, so that inferred neural mechanisms can provide hypotheses relevant to the human brain. Here we assessed whether rhesus macaques could model human context-driven object recognition by quantifying visual object identification abilities across variations in the amount, quality, and congruency of contextual cues. Behavioral metrics revealed strikingly similar context-dependent patterns between humans and monkeys. However, neural responses in the inferior temporal (IT) cortex of monkeys that were never explicitly trained to discriminate objects in context, as well as current artificial neural network models, could only partially explain this cross-species correspondence. The shared behavioral variance unexplained by context-naive neural data or computational models highlights fundamental knowledge gaps. Our findings demonstrate an intriguing alignment of human and monkey visual object processing that defies full explanation by either brain activity in a key visual region or state-of-the-art models.

neuroscience↗

Dynamics of Saccade Trajectory Modulation by Distractors: Neural Activity Patterns in the Frontal Eye Field

The sudden appearance of a visual distractor shortly before saccade initiation can capture spatial attention and modulate the saccade trajectory in spite of the ongoing execution of the initial plan to shift gaze straight to the saccade target. To elucidate the neural correlates underlying these curved saccades, we recorded from single neurons in the frontal eye field (FEF) of two rhesus monkeys shifting gaze to a target while an isoeccentric distractor appeared either left or right of the target at various delays after target presentation. We found that the population level of pre-saccadic activity encoded the direction of the saccade trajectory. Stronger activity occurred when saccades curved toward the distractor, and weaker when saccades curved away. This relationship held whether the distractor was ipsilateral or contralateral to the recorded neurons. Meanwhile, visually responsive neurons showed asymmetrical patterns of excitatory responses that varied with the location of the distractor and the duration of distractor processing relating to attentional capture and distractor inhibition. During earlier distractor processing, neurons encoded curvature towards the distractor. During later distractor processing, neurons encoded curvature away from the distractor. This was observed when saccades curved away from distractors contralateral to the recording site and when saccades curved towards distractors ipsilateral to the recording site. These findings indicate that saccadic motor planning involves dynamic push-pull hemispheric interactions producing attraction or repulsion for potential but unselected saccade targets. Significant StatementThis study not only advances our understanding of oculomotor function in dynamic environments but also has potential clinical relevance for diagnosing and understanding disorders characterized by abnormal saccade trajectories. Our research elucidates the neural mechanisms behind saccade trajectories that are not always linear due to the brains integration of multiple visual cues and/or motor plans. By analyzing the frontal eye field (FEF) activity in rhesus monkeys, we found that saccade directionality and timing are influenced by the interaction between FEF visual neurons representing target and distractor stimuli. The FEFs role extends beyond a winner-takes-all approach, incorporating saccade vector averaging computations that produce curved saccades. Furthermore, ipsilateral visual neurons encode distractor suppression that drives curvature away from the distractor.

neuroscience↗

Object motion representation in the macaque ventral stream -- a gateway to understanding the brain's intuitive physics engine

Effective interaction with moving objects and the ability to infer and predict their motion (a core component of "intuitive physics") is essential for survival in the dynamic world. How does the primate visual system process such stimuli, enabling predictive capabilities for dynamic stimuli statistics like motion velocity and expected trajectories? In this study, we probed brain areas in the ventral visual pathway of rhesus macaques implicated in object recognition (areas V4 and inferior temporal, IT, cortex) to evaluate how they represent object motion speed and direction. We assessed the relationship between the distributed population activity in the ventral stream and two distinct object motion-based behaviors--one reliant on information directly available in videos (speed discrimination) and the other predicated on predictive motion estimates from videos (future event predictions). Further, employing microstimulation strategies, we confirm the causal, functional role of the IT cortex in these behaviors. Our results underscore the need to re-examine the traditional functional segregation of the primate visual cortices into "what" and "where" pathways and provide empirical constraints to model their interaction for a better circuit-level understanding of visual motion and intuitive physics.

neuroscience↗

Gaze and Arrows: does the Gaze Following Patch in the posterior temporal cortex differentiate social and symbolic spatial cues?

The Gaze Following Patch (GFP) is located in the posterior temporal cortex and has been described as a cortical module dedicated to processing other peoples gaze direction in a domain-specific manner. Thus, it appears to be the neural correlate of Baron-Cohens Eye-Direction Detector (EDD) which is one of the core modules in his Mindreading System - a neurocognitive model for the Theory of Mind concept. Inspired by Jerry Fodors ideas on the modularity of the mind, Baron-Cohen proposed that, among other things, the individual modules are domain-specific. In the case of the EDD this means that it exclusively processes eye-like stimuli to extract gaze direction and that other stimuli, that may carry directional information as well, are processed elsewhere. If the GFP is indeed EDDs neural correlate it must meet this expectation. To test this, we compared the GFPs BOLD activity during gaze-direction following with the activity during arrow-direction following. Contrary to the expectation based on the assumption of domain specificity we did not find a differentiation between gaze and arrow-direction following. In fact, we were not able to reproduce the GFP as presented in previous studies. A possible explanation is that in the present study - unlike previous work -, the gaze stimuli did not contain an obvious change of direction that represented a visual motion. Hence, the critical stimulus component responsible for the identification of the GFP in previous experiments might have been visual motion.

neuroscience↗

Decoding of the other’s focus of attention by a temporal cortex module

Faces attract the observers attention towards objects and locations of interest for the other, thereby allowing the two agents to establish joint attention. Previous work has delineated a network of cortical \"patches\" in the macaque cortex, processing faces, eventually also extracting information on the others gaze direction. Yet, the neural mechanism that links information on gaze direction, guiding the observers attention to the relevant object has remained elusive. Here we present electrophysiological evidence for the existence of a distinct \"gaze-following patch (GFP)\" with neurons that establish this linkage in a highly flexible manner. The others gaze and the object, singled out by the gaze, are linked only if this linkage is pertinent within the prevailing social context. The properties of these neurons establish the GFP as a key switch in controlling social interactions based on the others gaze.\n\nOne Sentence SummaryNeurons in a \"gaze-following patch\" in the posterior temporal cortex orchestrate the flexible linkage between the others gaze and objects of interest to both, the other and the observer.

neuroscience↗

A fronto-temporo-parietal network disambiguates potential objects of joint attention

We use the others gaze direction to identify her/his object of interest and to shift our attention to the same object, i.e. to establish joint attention. However, gaze direction may not be sufficient to unambiguously identify the object of interest as the others gaze may hit more than one object. In this case, the observer must use a priori information to disambiguate the object choice. Using fMRI, we suggest that the disambiguation is based on a 3-component network. A first component, the well-known gaze following patch in the posterior STS is activated by gaze following per se. BOLD activity here is determined exclusively by the usage of gaze direction and is independent of the need to disambiguate the relevant object. On the other hand, BOLD activity revealing a priori information for the disambiguation and starting early enough to this end is confined to a patch of cortex at the inferior frontal junction. Finally, BOLD activity reflecting the convergence of both, a priori information and gaze direction, needed to shift attention to a particular object location is confined to the posterior parietal cortex.

neuroscience↗