Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Rajic, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Rajic, S..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Biological aging of different blood cell types

A biological age (BA) indicator is intended to capture detrimental age-related changes occurring with passing time. To date, the best-known and used BA indicators include DNA-methylation-based epigenetic ages (epigenetic clocks) and telomere length. The most common biological sample material for epidemiological aging studies is composed of different cell types, whole blood. We aimed to compare differences in BAs between blood cell types and assessed BA indicators cell type-specific associations with donors calendar age. Analysis on DNA methylation-based BA indicators including telomere length, methylation level at cg16867657 (a CpG-site in ELOVL2) and the Hannum, Horvath, DNAmPhenoAge and DunedinPACE epigenetic clocks was performed in 428 biological samples from 12 blood cell types. BA values were different (p<0.05) in the majority of pairwise comparisons between the cell types. Most cell types also displayed differences as compared to whole blood (p<0.05). Some of the observed differences persisted across blood donors calendar ages from 20 to 80 years (50-years-difference in DNAmPhenoAge between naive CD4+ T cells and monocytes), while others did not (up to four-fold difference in DunedinPACE values between monocytes and B cells). All BA indicators, except DunedinPACE, had mostly a very strong correlation with donors calendar age within a cell type. Our findings demonstrate that DNA methylation-based indicators of biological age exhibit cell type-specific characteristics, underscoring the importance of accounting for cell composition in related studies. Our results have implications for understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying epigenetic clocks and and provide guidance for utilizing them as indicators for success of aging interventions.

molecular biology↗

Non-coding 886 (nc886/vtRNA2-1), the epigenetic odd duck - implications for future studies

Non-coding 886 (nc886, VTRNA2-1) is the only human polymorphically imprinted gene, in which the methylation status is not determined by genetics. Existing literature regarding the establishment, stability, and consequences of the methylation pattern, as well as the nature and function of the nc886 RNAs transcribed from the locus, are contradictory. For example, the methylation status of the locus has been reported to be stable through life and across somatic tissues, but also susceptible to environmental effects. The nature of the produced nc886 RNAs has been redefined multiple times and are still under debate and in carcinogenesis, these RNAs have been reported to have conflicting roles. In addition, due to the bimodal methylation pattern of the nc886 locus, traditional genome-wide methylation analyses can lead to false-positive results, especially in smaller datasets. Here, we aim to summarise the existing literature regarding nc886, discuss how the characteristics of nc886 give rise to contradictory results, and reinterpret, reanalyse and, where possible, replicate the results presented in the current literature. We also introduce novel findings on how the nc886 methylation pattern distribution is associated with the geographical origins of the population and describe the methylation changes in a large variety of human tumours. Through the example of this one peculiar genetic locus and RNA, we aim to highlight issues in the analysis of DNA methylation and non-coding RNAs in general and offer our suggestions for what should be taken into consideration in future analyses.

molecular biology↗

Methylation status of VTRNA2-1/nc886 is stable across human populations, monozygotic twin pairs and in majority of somatic tissues

Aims and methodsOur aim was to characterise the methylation level of a polymorphically imprinted gene, VTRNA2-1/nc886, in human populations and somatic tissues. We utilised 48 datasets, consisting of >30 different tissues and >30 000 individuals. ResultsWe show that the nc886 methylation status is associated with twin status and ethnic background, but the variation between populations is limited. Monozygotic twin pairs present concordant methylation, while [~]30% of dizygotic twin pairs present discordant methylation in the nc886 locus. The methylation levels of nc886 are uniform across somatic tissues, except in cerebellum and skeletal muscle. ConclusionWe hypothesize that the nc886 imprint is established in the oocyte and that after implantation, the methylation status is stable, excluding a few specific tissues.

molecular biology↗