bioRxiv2019
Domestication of crops and animals during the Holocene epoch played a critical role in shaping human culture, diet and genetic variation. This domestication process took place across a span of time and space, especially in Asia. We hypothesize that domestication of plants and animals around the world must have influenced the human genome differentially among human populations to a far greater degree than has been appreciated previously. The range of domesticated foods that were available in different regions can be expected to have created regionally distinct nutrient intake profiles and deficiencies. To capture this complexity, we used archaeobotanical evidence to construct two models of dietary nutrient composition over a 9000 year time span in Asia: one based on Larson et al. (2014) and measured through composition of 8 nutrients, and another taking into account a wider range of crops, cooking and lifestyle variation, and the dietary variables glycemic index and carbohydrate content. We hypothesize that the subtle dietary shifts through time and space have also influenced current human genetic variation among Asians. We used statistical methods BayeScEnv, BayeScan and Baypass, to examine the impact of our reconstructed long-term dietary habits on genome-wide genetic variation in 29 current-day Asian populations (Figure S1, Figure 1, Figure 2). Our results show that genetic variation in diet-related pathways is correlated with dietary differences among Asian populations. SNPs in five genes, GHR, LAMA1, SEMA3A, CAST and TCF7L2, involved in the gene ontologies salivary gland morphogenesis and negative regulation of type B pancreatic cell apoptotic process suggest that metabolism may have been primary targets of selection driven by dietary shifts. These shifts may have influenced biological pathways in ways that have a lasting impact on health. We present a case that archaeobotanical evidence can provide valuable insight for understanding how historical human niche construction might have influenced modern human genetic variation.\n\nO_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=119 SRC=\"FIGDIR/small/747709v1_fig1.gif\" ALT=\"Figure 1\">\nView larger version (26K):\norg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1aa917corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@135990forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d3e0d3org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@14d5112_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 1.C_FLOATNO Organization of the study and analysis pipeline. The two figures in column Archaeological data refer to the two constructed dietary models, with the boxes beside them referring to the dietary variables from each model.\n\nC_FIG O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=107 SRC=\"FIGDIR/small/747709v1_fig2a.gif\" ALT=\"Figure 2\">\nO_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=112 SRC=\"FIGDIR/small/747709v1_fig2b.gif\" ALT=\"Figure 2\">\nView larger version (52K):\norg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1059950org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@94662dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c01de2org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@ea07cb_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 2.C_FLOATNO Summary of Diet Model 1. a) Levels of nutrients contributed by domestication, based on Diet Model 1, as a sum total of values across all three population groups. b) Average levels of nutrients across the three time intervals (9000 YBP-present) in each region, based on Diet Model 1. Supplementary Tables 1-8 contain the data used to generate these figures.\n\nC_FIG