Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Rai, D.

Publications and source records attributed to Rai, D..

2 recordsLinked to original sources
bioRxiv2017

Autistic traits and suicidal thoughts, plans and self-harm in late adolescence: population based cohort study

ImportanceThere have been recent concerns about a higher incidence of mortality by suicide in people with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). To our knowledge, no large cohort studies have examined which features of autism may lead to suicidal ideation and behaviour, and whether there are any potential modifiable mechanisms.\n\nObjectiveTo examine the hypothesis that ASD diagnosis and traits in childhood are associated with suicidal thoughts, plans and self-harm at 16 years, and that any of the observed associations are explained by depression in adolescence at 12 years.\n\nDesign, setting and participantsProspective investigation of associations between ASD diagnosis and autistic traits with suicidal ideation and behaviour and a potential risk pathway via depression in early adolescence in 5,031 members of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children.\n\nMain outcomes and measuresHistory of self-harm with and without suicidal intent, suicidal thoughts and plans at 16 years assessed using a detailed self-report questionnaire. Exposures were ASD diagnosis and four measures (the coherence subscale of the Childrens Communication Checklist, the Social and Communication Disorders Checklist, a repetitive behaviour measure, and the sociability temperament subscale of the Emotionality, Activity and Sociability scale) dichotomised to represent the autism trait groups. Depressive symptoms in early adolescence were measured by the Short Moods and Feelings Questionnaire at 12 years.\n\nResultsChildren with impaired social communication had a higher risk of self-harm with suicidal intent (RR 2.10, 95% CI 1.28, 3.34), suicidal thoughts (1.42 times (95% CI 1.06, 1.91) and suicidal plans (RR 1.95, 95% CI 1.09, 3.47) by the age of 16 years as compared to those without. There was no evidence for an association between ASD diagnosis and the outcomes although these analyses were imprecise due to small numbers. There was also no evidence of an association between other autism trait measures and the outcomes. Approximately 32% of the total estimated association between social communication impairment and self-harm was explained by depressive symptoms at age 12 years.\n\nConclusionsImpairments in social communication are important in relation to suicidality. Early identification and management of depression may be a preventative mechanism and future research identifying other modifiable mechanisms may lead to preventative action or interventions against suicidal behaviour in this high-risk group.

epidemiology↗
bioRxiv2017

Gestational Age At Birth And Risk Of Intellectual Disability Without A Common Genetic Cause: Findings From The Stockholm Youth Cohort

BackgroundPreterm birth is linked to intellectual disability and there is evidence to suggest post-term birth may also incur risk. However, these associations have not yet been investigated in the absence of common genetic causes of intellectual disability (where risk associated with late delivery may be preventable) or with methods allowing stronger causal inference from non-experimental data. We aimed to examine risk of intellectual disability without a common genetic cause across the entire range of gestation, using a matched-sibling design to account for unmeasured confounding by shared familial factors.\n\nMethods and FindingsWe conducted a population-based retrospective study using data from the Stockholm Youth Cohort (n=499,621) and examined associations in a nested cohort of matched siblings (n=8,034). Children born at non-optimal gestational duration (before/after 40 weeks 3 days) were at greater risk of intellectual disability. Risk was greatest among those born extremely early (adjusted OR24 weeks=14.54 [95% CI 11.46-18.44]), lessening with advancing gestational age toward term (aOR32 weeks=3.59 [3.22-4.01]; aOR37 weeks=1.50 [1.38-1.63]); aOR38 weeks=1.26 [1.16-1.37]; aOR39 weeks=1.10 [1.04-1.17]) and increasing with advancing gestational age post-term (aOR42 weeks=1.16 [1.08-1.25]; aOR42 weeks=1.41 [1.21-1.64]; aOR44 weeks=1.71 [1.34-2.18]; aOR45 weeks=2.07 [1.47-2.92]). Associations persisted in a nested cohort of matched outcome-discordant siblings suggesting they were robust against confounding from shared genetic or environmental traits, although there may have been residual confounding by unobserved non-shared characteristics. Risk of intellectual disability was greatest among children showing evidence of fetal growth restriction, especially when birth occurred before or after term.\n\nConclusionsBirth at non-optimal gestational duration may be linked causally with greater risk of intellectual disability. The mechanisms underlying these associations need to be elucidated as they will be relevant to clinical practice concerning elective delivery within the term period and the mitigation of risk in children who are born post-term.

epidemiology↗