Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Pulido Chadid, K.

Publications and source records attributed to Pulido Chadid, K..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Human development and inequality shape global threat patterns for terrestrial biodiversity

Biodiversity loss is driven by unsustainable human activities, yet the contextual conditions and underlying drivers of threats remain poorly understood. We assessed how protected areas, socioeconomic conditions, and biophysical factors explain global patterns of threat probabilities across six major threat types and four vertebrate taxa. We identified key explanatory variables and their associations with threats using Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Socioeconomic conditions, specifically human development and income inequality, were the strongest predictors. Their associations were complex and non-linear: notably, high human development index (HDI) was associated with both higher and lower threat probabilities, depending on inequality and regional context. Second, land cover and biophysical variables, such as shrubland cover, tree cover, and elevation range, explained additional, but taxon-specific variation. Finally, protected areas showed limited ability to explain threat patterns. By linking threat probabilities to their contextual and socioecological conditions, we aim to build a better understanding of the systemic drivers of biodiversity loss.

ecology↗

Are protected areas tracking threats to terrestrial biodiversity?

1Protected areas (PAs) are vital for nature conservation, yet evidence shows that pressure on biodiversity is increasing despite their global expansion. Using threat probability maps based on the IUCN Red List and PA data, we analyzed the relationship between PA coverage and the major threats--agriculture, hunting, logging, pollution, invasive species, and urbanization--affecting amphibians, birds, mammals, and reptiles. Our analysis includes data on 33,379 species and 255,848 protected sites. Our results reveal a potential disconnect between global PAs and threat tracking, often leaving high-threat areas insufficiently protected. Over half of the mapped area for amphibians and mammals faces high threat impact probability and insufficient PA cover. Amphibians face the highest proportion of high-simultaneous threats and lack sufficient cover. Areas facing a high probability of impact lacking sufficient PA cover also harbor the highest proportion of threatened species across all taxonomic groups. Our research provides crucial insights into the current state of terrestrial PAs concerning threats, highlighting areas requiring immediate attention and guiding strategic conservation planning.

ecology↗