Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Prokopenko, D.

Publications and source records attributed to Prokopenko, D..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Expanded genetic landscape of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease reveals heterogeneous cell type and phenotype associations

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the leading cause of respiratory mortality worldwide. Genetic risk loci provide novel insights into disease pathogenesis. To broaden COPD genetic risk loci discovery and identify cell type and phenotype associations we performed a genome-wide association study in 35,735 cases and 222,076 controls from the UK Biobank and additional studies from the International COPD Genetics Consortium. We identified 82 loci with P value < 5x10-8; 47 were previously described in association with either COPD or population-based lung function. Of the remaining 35 novel loci, 13 were associated with lung function in 79,055 individuals from the SpiroMeta consortium. Using gene expression and regulation data, we identified enrichment for loci in lung tissue, smooth muscle and alveolar type II cells. We found 9 shared genomic regions between COPD and asthma and 5 between COPD and pulmonary fibrosis. COPD genetic risk loci clustered into groups of quantitative imaging features and comorbidity associations. Our analyses provide further support to the genetic susceptibility and heterogeneity of COPD.

genetics

Reporting correct p-values in VEGAS analyses

VEGAS (versatile gene-based association study) is a popular methodological framework to perform gene-based tests based on summary statistics from single-variant analyses. The approach incorporates linkage disequilibrium information from reference panels to account for the correlation of test statistics. The gene-based test can utilize three different types of tests. In 2015, the improved framework VEGAS2, using more detailed reference panels, was published. Both versions provide user-friendly web- and offline-based tools for the analysis. However, the implementation of the popular top-percentage test is erroneous in both versions. The p-values provided by VEGAS2 are deflated/anti-conservative. Based on real data examples, we demonstrate that this can increase substantially the rate of false positive findings and can lead to inconsistencies between different test options. We also provide code that allows the user of VEGAS to compute correct p-values.

genetics