Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Prokopenko, C.

Publications and source records attributed to Prokopenko, C..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Extreme Heat as the New Normal: A Methodological Roadmap for Behavior, Physiology, and Species Distributions

A defining feature of climate change is the increasing frequency, intensity, and severity of extreme weather events. Among them, extreme heat is recognized as a critical driver of ecological and evolutionary change. Intense heat episodes can exceed physiological limits, alter animal movement, restructure geographic ranges, and increase extinction risk more than gradual changes to mean temperatures. Yet links between extreme heat events and organismal biology remain limited, in part because definitions and metrics are not standardized, and user-friendly workflows and guides are lacking for many biologists. We present a methodological roadmap, with reproducible code, for integrating extreme heat into studies of behavior, physiology, biophysical ecology, species distribution models (SDMs), and population dynamics. First, we provide standardized computational approaches to define and quantify extreme heat. Second, we fit species distribution models for California quail (Callipepla californica) that include an extreme heat metric and showcase improved predictions of habitat suitability, particularly at range edges. Third, we compute biophysical simulations to quantify exposure to thermal stress in Sleepy lizards (Tiliqua rugosa) across distinct macro- and microclimates. Finally, accounting for temporal autocorrelation in temperature profiles in population simulation models, we show that clustered heat extremes--missed by averages--can increase the risk of population collapse. As extreme heat events become more common, incorporating their dynamics is essential for understanding ecological and evolutionary change, designing experiments across species geographic ranges, and supporting conservation in a rapidly warming world. Together, these case studies illustrate a reproducible, organism-informed roadmap to integrate extreme heat into predictions of ecological impacts and inference across levels of biological organization under ongoing climate change.

ecology↗

Hunger drives switching and searching response in a social predator

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWHunger is a frequent state for many predators and increasing hunger is likely to motivate costly behaviour to acquire necessary resources. Generalist predators must balance the costs and gains of hunting different prey, including increasing encounter rates and improving success rates by seeking areas with greater prey catchability. Large carnivores face threats when they interact with humans or conspecifics. We use integrated step selection analysis to describe spatiotemporal factors that influence wolf (Canis lupus) hunting behavior in Riding Mountain National Park, a natural area that wolves share with moose (Alces alces) and elk (Cervus canadensis). If hunger generates more risky behavior by wolves, as time-from-kill increases we expect wolves will: (1) search for and kill a prey that poses higher risk of injury, (2) use the periphery of their range, (3) use areas closer to the park boundary. Hunger alters wolf space use and drives a fine scale change in prey tracking. Movement patterns of hungry wolves are indicative of search behavior, i.e., shorter steps and more turning. Contrary to our predictions, hungry wolves moved further into the park. As wolves become hungrier, they switch their response from a weak selection to avoidance of elk. In contrast, the response to the primary and emergent prey, moose varied between individuals with some pack level similarities. Therefore, the state-based response to a pervasive risk and a historical resource was conserved in a population residing in a prey rich island interfacing with human disturbance.

ecology↗

Solving the Sample Size Problem for Resource Selection Analysis

O_LISample size sufficiency is a critical consideration for conducting Resource-Selection Analyses (RSAs) from GPS-based animal telemetry. Cited thresholds for sufficiency include a number of captured animals M [≥] 30 and as many relocations per animal N as possible. These thresholds render many RSA-based studies misleading if large sample sizes were truly insufficient, or unpublishable if small sample sizes were sufficient but failed to meet reviewer expectations. C_LIO_LIWe provide the first comprehensive solution for RSA sample size by deriving closed-form mathematical expressions for the number of animals M and the number of relocations per animal N required for model outputs to a given degree of precision. The sample sizes needed depend on just 2 biologically meaningful quantities: habitat selection strength and a novel measure of landscape complexity, which we define rigorously. The mathematical expressions are calculable for any environmental dataset at any spatial scale and are applicable to any study involving resource selection (including sessile organisms). We validate our analytical solutions using globally relevant empirical data including 5,678,623 GPS locations from 511 animals from 10 species (omnivores, carnivores, and herbivores living in boreal, temperate, and tropical forests, montane woodlands, swamps, and arctic tundra). C_LIO_LIOur analytic expressions show that the required M and N must decline with increasing selection strength and increasing landscape complexity, and this decline is insensitive to the definition of availability used in the analysis. Our results contradict conventional wisdom by demonstrating that the most biologically relevant effects on the utilization distribution (i.e. those landscape conditions with the greatest absolute magnitude of resource selection) can often be estimated with far fewer data than is commonly assumed. C_LIO_LIWe identify several critical steps in implementing these equations, including (i) a priori selection of expected model coefficients, and (ii) sampling intensity for background (absence/pseudo-absence) data within a given definition of availability. We show that random sampling of background data violates the underlying mathematics of RSA, leading to incorrect values for necessary M and N and potentially incorrect RSA model outputs. We argue that these equations should be a mandatory component for all future RSA studies. C_LI

ecology↗