Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Praulins, G.

Publications and source records attributed to Praulins, G..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Multi-site phenotypic characterisation of Kisumu colonies for comparison of insecticide susceptibility between testing centres

Testing of insecticides and insecticide-based vector control tools relies on the use of bioassays whereby insects are exposed and mortality, or another relevant entomological endpoint, is measured. To be able to compare results between products and across time and space standard laboratory strains are used. Insecticide-susceptible strains are often used as comparators in studies involving insecticide-resistant populations. Kisumu is a long-established, widely-used insecticide-susceptible strain of Anopheles gambiae. In this study, 16 facilities across different countries exposed their Kisumu colonies aged 3-5 days to four insecticides (permethrin, alpha-cypermethrin, DDT and pirimiphos-methyl) at a range of concentrations in WHO tube assays to assess susceptibility. Insecticide-treated filter papers were made at the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine and sent to testing centres, along with a standard protocol and testing conditions requirements, to standardise testing as much as possible. A first observation was that DDT results were affected by the use of Risella oil, the WHO-recommended carrier oil but immiscible in acetone, leading to uneven coating of papers and increased variability in bioassay results (40x variance between colonies). Bioassay data generated by the testing facilities suggest a wide range of susceptibility to different insecticides between colonies of Kisumu: LC50 values between colonies differed, though not significantly, by up to 4x for permethrin, 6x for pirimiphos-methyl, and 15x for alpha-cypermethrin. Some colonies are classified as insecticide resistant based on the WHO definition of <98% mortality on exposure to a discriminating concentration. The assumption that Kisumu is a standard susceptible strain, consistent between facilities is challenged, which has implications when comparing results between studies. We propose genotypic analysis of the colonies to identify signs of resistance markers indicative of contamination from resistant strains or wild mosquitoes, and generation of guidance to support the maintenance and monitoring of susceptible mosquito strains.

zoology↗

The Two Tube Volatile Assay: a non-contact benchtop bioassay for monitoring susceptibility to transfluthrin

IntroductionProgress against malaria has stalled since 2015, with insecticide resistance a key driver. Spatial emanators release volatile insecticides into the air, exposing mosquitoes through a route distinct from the tarsal contact used by treated nets, indoor residual spraying, and standard bioassays. Transfluthrin is currently monitored using the WHO bottle bioassay, which combines contact and vapour exposure and cannot isolate airborne effects. A scalable, vapour-only method is needed to characterise susceptibility to volatile pyrethroids. MethodsWe adapted the WHO tube bioassay to deliver non-contact transfluthrin vapour exposure without contacting treated papers. Non-blood-fed female Anopheles were exposed to acetone control or transfluthrin papers at 0.005, 0.1 and 2 mg/paper. Knockdown was recorded over 60 minutes and mortality at 24 hours. Testing spanned three laboratories (LSTM, AIRID and KEMRI) using susceptible reference and resistant lab colonies. Dose response models estimated EC{square}{square} for knockdown (EC{square}{square}KD) and mortality (EC{square}{square}Mort), with resistance ratios (RR) against the local susceptible reference. ResultsThe assay generated clear concentration- and time-dependent responses. At LSTM, Kisumu gave an EC{square}{square}KD of 0.052 and EC{square}{square}Mort of 0.054 mg/paper; Siaya was comparable (RR{square}{square}KD 1.17, RR{square}{square}Mort 0.89), whereas Tiassale 13 and KDR showed reduced susceptibility (RR{square}{square}KD 2.42 and 2.85; RR{square}{square}Mort 5.56 and 6.65). At AIRID, the resistant Cove strain did not reach 50% knockdown or mortality. At KEMRI, Siaya showed reduced susceptibility (RR{square}{square}KD 3.36/RR{square}{square}Mort 5.65). Kisumu at AIRID and KEMRI was comparable to LSTM (EC{square}{square}KD 0.007/EC{square}{square}Mort 0.030; EC{square}{square}KD 0.044/EC{square}{square}Mort 0.023). Despite inter-laboratory variation, susceptible strains remained distinguishable from resistant ones. Lower RRs than for contact pyrethroids suggest contact-based phenotypes may not predict vapour susceptibility. ConclusionThe assay provides a practical benchtop method using standard WHO hardware, distinguishing susceptible from resistant strains across three laboratories. Twenty-four-hour mortality is the recommended endpoint, 60-minute knockdown secondary. Not yet validated, it provides a foundation for further validation and adaptation to other actives.

zoology↗

Multi-centre laboratory study to determine discriminating concentrations for broflanilide and isocycloseram resistance monitoring in mosquitoes

1In 2024-2025 a multi-centre study involving seven international laboratories was conducted with the support of the World Health Organization (WHO). The aim of the study was to establish and validate discriminating concentrations (DCs) in WHO bottle bioassays for monitoring susceptibility to broflanilide and isocycloseram in Anopheles gambiae s.s., An. funestus, An. stephensi and Aedes aegypti. The following values are recommended for adoption as DCs for broflanilide: 10 {micro}g/bottle for An. gambiae and Ae. aegypti, 15 {micro}g/bottle for An. funestus, and 25 {micro}g/bottle for An. stephensi. The recommended DCs for isocycloseram are 15 {micro}g/bottle for Ae. aegypti, 30 {micro}g/bottle for An. gambiae, 50 {micro}g/bottle for An. stephensi, and 60 {micro}g/bottle for An. funestus. Based on the experiences of conducting this study, which represents the application of a generic protocol for establishing discriminating concentrations produced by the WHO, technical recommendations are made on the generation and analysis of DC data for insecticides in future.

zoology↗