Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Prabhakar, A. T.

Publications and source records attributed to Prabhakar, A. T..

12 recordsLinked to original sources

Subliminal Primes Bias the Spatial Locus of Involuntary Object Naming in a Two-Object Reflexive Imagery Task

Certain conscious contents--such as the covert name of a viewed object--arise involuntarily and resist suppression, a phenomenon captured by the Reflexive Imagery Task (RIT). Whether a subliminal prime can bias which of two simultaneously present objects captures such an involuntary naming response has not been established. We adapted a two-object RIT into a self-contained, browser-based instrument. Thirty-eight adults (M age = 21.6 years, SD = 2.3; 26 female) viewed 24 object pairs and were instructed to fixate a central cross, to refrain from thinking of the objects names, and to click an object whenever its name intruded into awareness. On each trial a masked prime (17 ms, flanked by pattern masks) was either the exact name of one object (Exact Word Prime), a semantic associate of one object (Semantic Prime), or a neutral string (No Prime), defining a primed side per trial. A post-experiment debriefing confirmed that participants noticed the masks but none consciously perceived or could identify the prime words, indicating that the primes were subliminal. Analyses excluded 91 of 912 trials (10.0%) with more than five clicks. The priming effect was robust across measures: an omnibus comparison of clicks across conditions was significant (Friedman {chi}{superscript 2}(2) = 6.59, p = .037); within both prime conditions participants clicked the primed side more than the not-primed side (Exact Word, p = .039; Semantic, p = .005); and the primed-to-not-primed ratio exceeded parity by roughly 57-59% (Laplace-smoothed ratio {approx} 1.58; one-sample Wilcoxon p < .001 for each). A Bayesian Poisson generalized linear mixed model with random participant intercepts confirmed a credible primed-side advantage (incidence rate ratio = 1.72, 95% credible interval [1.57, 1.90]) that did not differ between prime types. No general left/right response bias emerged. An exploratory ight-side x Exact Word Prime interaction was inconsistent across model classes and is reported as hypothesis-generating. The findings indicate that subliminal lexical and semantic primes can steer the spatial locus of involuntary object naming.

neuroscience↗

Differentiation-Dependent Proximity Proteomics Identifies Novel Host Factors Linked to HPV16 E2 Function

Human papillomavirus 16 (HPV16) is a causative agent of oropharyngeal, cervical and anogenital cancers. The viral E2 protein is essential for viral genome replication, transcriptional regulation, episome maintenance, and activation of the host DNA damage response. Despite its central role, the full network of HPV16 E2 interactions with host proteins remains incompletely defined, particularly under differentiating conditions which support the complete viral life cycle. In this study, we used TurboID-based proximity labeling to characterize the interactome of HPV16 E2 and known host partner protein TOPBP1, in both undifferentiated monolayer and differentiating keratinocytes. We generated stable keratinocyte lines expressing doxycycline-inducible TurboID-tagged HPV16 E2 and confirmed that the tagged protein retained transcriptional, replicative, and DNA damage-inducing functions. Mass spectrometry analysis of streptavidin-enriched proteins identified both known and novel E2-associated host factors, including chromatin regulators, DNA repair proteins, and nucleolar components. Comparative analysis revealed a substantial overlap between E2 and TOPBP1 interactomes, and in situ validation by proximity ligation assay identified nucleolin (NCL) as a differentiation-dependent factor whose interaction with E2 is stabilized by TOPBP1. Functional studies demonstrated that NCL is required for episomal genome maintenance, highlighting a cooperative E2-TOPBP1- NCL axis critical for viral genome stability during differentiation. These findings provide a comprehensive view of the E2-associated protein landscape in stratified epithelial cells and reveal a mechanistic pathway through which HPV16 co-opts host factors to support genome maintenance, productive replication, and persistence. ImportanceHuman papillomaviruses (HPVs) establish persistent infections in stratified epithelia and rely on host DNA damage and repair factors to support their replication. The E2 protein is central to viral genome replication and maintenance, and depends heavily on its interaction with the host factor TOPBP1 for these functions. Here, we define the E2 and TOPBP1 interactomes in differentiating keratinocytes, and identify nucleolin (NCL) a critical differentiation- and TOPBP1-dependent E2 partner required for episomal genome stability. These findings expand the understanding of how HPV16 coordinates viral replication with host chromatin and DNA repair networks, uncovering a cooperative E2-TOPBP1-NCL axis that may represent a new target for antiviral intervention.

cancer biology↗

Multimodal lesion mapping in affective blindsight reveals dual amygdala and superior temporal sulcus contributions to nonconscious emotion processing

Affective blindsight, the capacity to discriminate emotional stimuli despite bilateral damage to the primary visual cortex (V1) and without conscious awareness, offers a unique model of non-conscious visual processing. Subcortical pathways involving the pulvinar and amygdala have been proposed, but putative cortical contributions remain unclear. We examined 182 patients, including 31 with bilateral V1 lesions. Among these, 15 had cortical visual loss and 7 showed affective blindsight. Using behavioral testing, lesion symptom mapping, and tractography, we found that preserved pulvinar connectivity with both the posterior superior temporal sulcus (STS) and the amygdala is necessary for affective blindsight. These findings provide causal evidence for a multi-route architecture, identifying the pulvinar-STS pathway, alongside the pulvinar-amygdala pathway, as a critical substrate for non-conscious affective processing.

neuroscience↗

E2 displacement of CIP2A from TOPBP1 activates the DNA damage response during papillomavirus life cycles

The papillomavirus life cycle is intricately linked to epithelial differentiation, and the virus manipulates the differentiation process to facilitate viral production. One such manipulation is activation of the DNA damage response (DDR) which promotes viral replication via homologous recombination. This report demonstrates that the papillomavirus transcription/replication/segregation factor E2 activates the DNA damage response (DDR). During differentiation, E2 displacement of CIP2A from TOPBP1 causes CIP2A to bind and inhibit PP2A resulting in DDR activation via ATM phosphorylation. The DDR promotes inhibitory interaction of DBC1 with the class III deacetylase SIRT1, which further boosts the DDR via increased acetylation and stability of viral and host proteins. E2 forms a complex with TOPBP1 and ATM, while preventing ATR activation by blocking TOPBP1-ATR interaction. This "ATM up ATR down" phenotype promotes viral replication via ATM promotion of homologous recombination, and cell proliferation via inhibition of ATR. We demonstrate this mechanism of DDR activation in multiple systems: keratinocytes expressing only E2, in foreskin keratinocytes immortalized by HPV16, in HPV16 positive keratinocytes derived from a cervical lesion, in pre-neoplastic lesions induced by mouse papillomavirus MmuPV1, in head and neck cancer cell lines that retain E2 expression, and in HPV16 positive oropharyngeal patient derived xenografts that retain E2 expression. ATM inhibition preferentially killed cells expressing E2, presenting a novel strategy for treating HPV early preneoplasia and a large subset of HPV+ oropharyngeal cancers retaining E2 expression and episomal genomes.

cancer biology↗

HPV16 recruitment of SMARCAL1 to viral and host replication forks is required for the viral life cycle

High-risk human papillomaviruses (HR HPVs) are responsible for around 5% of the worlds cancer burden. Activation and interaction with the host DNA damage response (DDR) promotes the HPV16 life cycle. This study demonstrates a crucial interaction between HPV16 and SMARCAL1, a protein involved in the stabilization of stalled DNA replication forks. SMARCAL1 can complex with E2, is recruited to E1-E2 replicating DNA, and SMARCAL1 knockdown reduces the fidelity of E1-E2 mediated DNA replication in C33a cells but does not alter replication levels. SMARCAL1 is recruited to the HPV16 genome in HPV16-immortalized foreskin keratinocytes (HFK+HPV16), and in situ protein interaction with nascent DNA replication forks (SIRF) assays demonstrated that SMARCAL1 is hyper-recruited to host replication forks in HFK+HPV16 cells. Using COMET, DNA fiber, and cell growth assays it was determined that knockdown of SMARCAL1 increased DNA damage and impaired replication fork progression in HFK+HPV16 cells, ultimately resulting in growth arrest. The viral genome integrates following SMARCAL1 knockdown in HFK+HPV16 cells. Therefore, SMARCAL1 facilitates host and viral DNA replication in HFK+HPV16 cells. Overall, the results demonstrate that HPV16 promotes SMARCAL1 recruitment to viral and host replication forks and is an essential factor for the HPV16 life cycle. The results expand our understanding of DDR proteins that regulate the HPV16 life cycle, and suggest that inhibition of SMARCAL1 function represents a novel anti-viral strategy for the treatment and prevention of HPV infections. ImportanceHPV16 is responsible for the majority of HPV+ cancers, contributing to 54% of cervical cancers and [~]90% of HPV+HNSCC. Integration of viral genomes into host DNA can promote cervical cancer progression and correlates with poor prognosis in HPV-associated HNSCC, where around 70% of HPV+ cancers contain episomal viral genomes. Developing effective antiviral therapies requires a deeper understanding of the interplay between viral replication and host DNA damage response (DDR) pathways. This report demonstrates that SMARCAL1 is essential for HPV16 replication and keratinocyte proliferation and that its depletion leads to replication stress, DNA damage, and viral genome integration. This work underscores the delicate balance between viral exploitation of the host DDR and the risk of genome instability. These insights contribute to the broader understanding of HPV pathogenesis and may inform the development of therapeutic strategies targeting viral replication to prevent disease progression and improve clinical outcomes in HPV-associated cancers.

microbiology↗

Direct interaction with the BRD4 carboxyl-terminal motif (CTM) and TopBP1 is required for human papillomavirus 16 E2 association with mitotic chromatin and plasmid segregation function

During the human papillomavirus 16 life cycle, the E2 protein binds simultaneously to the viral genome and host chromatin throughout mitosis, ensuring viral genomes reside in daughter cell nuclei following cell division. Previously, we demonstrated that CK2 phosphorylation of E2 on serine 23 promotes interaction with TopBP1, and that this interaction is required for optimum E2 mitotic chromatin association and plasmid segregation function. Others have implicated BRD4 in mediating the plasmid segregation function of E2 and we have demonstrated that there is a TopBP1-BRD4 complex in the cell. We therefore further investigated the role of the E2-BRD4 interaction in mediating E2 association with mitotic chromatin and plasmid segregation function. Using a combination of immunofluorescence and our novel plasmid segregation assay in U2OS and N/Tert-1 cells stably expressing a variety of E2 mutants, we report that direct interaction with the BRD4 carboxyl-terminal motif (CTM) and TopBP1 is required for E2 association with mitotic chromatin and plasmid segregation. We also identify a novel TopBP1 mediated interaction between E2 and the BRD4 extra-terminal (ET) domain in vivo. Overall, the results demonstrate that direct interaction with TopBP1 and the BRD4 CTM are required for E2 mitotic chromatin association and plasmid segregation function. Disruption of this complex offers therapeutic options for targeting segregation of viral genomes into daughter cells, potentially combatting HPV16 infections, and cancers that retain episomal genomes. ImportanceHPV16 is a causative agent in around 3-4% of all human cancers and currently there are no anti-viral therapeutics available for combating this disease burden. In order to identify new therapeutic targets, we must increase our understanding of the HPV16 life cycle. Previously, we demonstrated that an interaction between E2 and the cellular protein TopBP1 mediates the plasmid segregation function of E2, allowing distribution of viral genomes into daughter nuclei following cell division. Here, we demonstrate that E2 interaction with an additional host protein, BRD4, is also essential for E2 segregation function, and that BRD4 exists in a complex with TopBP1. Overall, these results enhance our understanding of a critical part of the HPV16 life cycle and presents several therapeutic targets for disruption of the viral life cycle.

cancer biology↗

Interaction with TopBP1 mediates human papillomavirus 16 E2 plasmid segregation/retention function and stability during the viral life cycle

Human papillomavirus 16 (HPV16) E2 is a DNA binding protein that regulates transcription, replication and potentially, segregation of the HPV16 genome during the viral life cycle. In the segregation model, E2 simultaneously binds to viral and host chromatin, acting as a bridge to ensure that viral genomes reside in daughter nuclei following cell division. The host chromatin receptor for E2 mediating this function is unknown. Recently, we demonstrated that CK2 phosphorylation of E2 on serine 23 (S23) is required for interaction with TopBP1, and that this interaction promotes E2 and TopBP1 recruitment to mitotic chromatin. Here, we demonstrate that in U2OS and N/Tert-1 cells expressing wild type E2 and a non-TopBP1 binding mutant (S23A, serine 23 mutated to alanine), interaction with TopBP1 is essential for E2 recruitment of plasmids to mitotic chromatin. Using a novel quantitative segregation assay, we demonstrate that interaction with TopBP1 is required for E2 plasmid segregation. The interaction of E2 with TopBP1 promotes increased levels of E2 protein during mitosis in U2OS and N/Tert-1 cells, as well as in human foreskin keratinocytes immortalized by the HPV16 genome. Additionally, interaction with TopBP1 is required for expression of the E2 protein during the viral life cycle. Overall, our results demonstrate that E2 has plasmid segregation activity, and that the E2-TopBP1 interaction is essential for this E2 function and for E2 expression during the viral life cycle. ImportanceHPV16 causes 3-4% of all human cancers. During the viral life cycle, it is proposed that the viral genome is actively segregated into daughter nuclei, ensuring viral replication in the subsequent S phase. The E2 protein potentially bridges the viral and host genomes during mitosis to mediate segregation of the circular viral plasmid. Here, we demonstrate that E2 has the ability to mediate plasmid segregation, and that this function is dependent upon interaction with the host protein TopBP1. Additionally, we demonstrate that the E2-TopBP1 interaction promotes enhanced E2 expression during mitosis which likely promotes the plasmid segregation function of E2. Overall, our results present a mechanism of how HPV16 can segregate its viral genome during an active infection, a critical aspect of the viral life cycle.

molecular biology↗

A critical role for E2-p53 interaction during the human papillomavirus 16 life cycle

Human papillomaviruses (HPV) are causative agents in ano-genital and oral cancers; HPV16 is the most prevalent type detected in human cancers. The HPV16 E6 protein targets p53 for proteasomal degradation to facilitate proliferation of the HPV16 infected cell. However, in HPV16 immortalized cells E6 is predominantly spliced (E6*) and unable to degrade p53. Here we demonstrate that human foreskin keratinocytes immortalized by HPV16 (HFK+HPV16), and HPV16 positive oropharyngeal cancers, retain significant expression of p53. In addition, p53 levels can be increased in HPV16+ head and neck cancer cell lines following treatment with cisplatin. Introduction of full-length E6 into HFK+HPV16 resulted in attenuation of cellular growth (in hTERT immortalized HFK, E6 expression promoted enhanced proliferation). An understudied interaction is that between E2 and p53 and we investigated whether this was important for the viral life cycle. We generated mutant genomes with E2 unable to interact with p53 resulting in profound phenotypes in primary HFK. The mutant induced hyper-proliferation, but an ultimate arrest of cell growth; {beta}-galactosidase staining demonstrated increased senescence, and COMET assays showed increased DNA damage compared with HFK+HPV16 wild type cells. There was failure of the viral life cycle in organotypic rafts with the mutant HFK resulting in premature differentiation and reduced proliferation. The results indicate that the E2-p53 interaction is critical during the HPV16 life cycle, and that disruption of this interaction has anti-viral potential. We discuss potential mechanisms to explain these phenotypes. ImportanceHuman papillomaviruses are causative agents in around 5% of all cancers. There are currently no antivirals available to combat these infections and cancers, therefore it remains a priority to enhance our understanding of the HPV life cycle. Here we demonstrate that an interaction between the viral replication/transcription/segregation factor E2 and the tumor suppressor p53 is critical for the HPV16 life cycle. HPV16 immortalized cells retain significant expression of p53, and the critical role for the E2-p53 interaction demonstrates why this is the case. If the E2-p53 interaction is disrupted then HPV16 immortalized cells fail to proliferate, have enhanced DNA damage and senescence, and there is premature differentiation during the viral life cycle. Results suggest that targeting the E2-p53 interaction would have therapeutic benefits, potentially attenuating the spread of HPV16.

molecular biology↗

CK2 phosphorylation of human papillomavirus 16 E2 on serine 23 promotes interaction with TopBP1 and is critical for E2 plasmid retention function

During the human papillomavirus 16 (HPV16) life cycle, the E2 protein interacts with host factors to regulate viral transcription, replication and genome segregation/retention. Our understanding of host partner proteins and their roles in E2 functions remains incomplete. Here, we demonstrate that CK2 phosphorylation of E2 on serine 23 promotes interaction with TopBP1 in vitro and in vivo, and that E2 is phosphorylated on this residue during the HPV16 life cycle. We investigated the consequences of mutating serine 23 on E2 functions. E2-S23A activates and represses transcription identically to E2-WT (wild-type), and E2-S23A is as efficient as E2-WT in transient replication assays. However, E2-S23A has compromised interaction with mitotic chromatin when compared with E2-WT. In E2-WT cells, both E2 and TopBP1 levels increase during mitosis when compared with vector control cells. In E2-S23A cells, neither E2 nor TopBP1 levels increase during mitosis. We next tested whether this difference in E2-S23A levels during mitosis disrupts E2 plasmid retention function. We developed a novel plasmid retention assay and demonstrate that E2-S23A is deficient in plasmid retention when compared with E2-WT. siRNA targeted knockdown of TopBP1 abrogates E2-WT plasmid retention function. Introduction of the S23A mutation into the HPV16 genome resulted in delayed immortalization of human foreskin keratinocytes (HFK) and higher episomal viral genome copy number in resulting established HFK. Overall, our results demonstrate that CK2 phosphorylation of E2 on serine 23 promotes interaction with TopBP1, which is critical for E2 plasmid retention function and in HPV16 immortalization of keratinocytes. ImportanceHuman papillomaviruses are causative agents in around 5% of all cancers, with no specific anti-viral therapeutics available for treating infections or resultant cancers. In this report, we demonstrate that phosphorylation of HPV16 E2 by CK2 promotes formation of a complex formation with the cellular protein TopBP1 in vitro and in vivo. This complex results in stabilization of E2 during mitosis and mediates plasmid retention by E2. This function promotes the partitioning of viral genomes into the nuclei of daughter cells following mitosis. We demonstrate that CK2 phosphorylates E2 on serine 23 in vivo, and that CK2 inhibitors disrupt the E2-TopBP1 complex. Mutation of E2 serine 23 to alanine disrupts the HPV16 life cycle, demonstrating a critical function for this residue. Together, our results suggest that CK2 inhibitors may disrupt the E2-TopBP1 dependent HPV16 life cycle and potentially kill HPV16 positive cancers, which lays a molecular foundation to develop novel therapeutic approaches for combating HPV16 disease.

molecular biology↗

The Effect of Refractive Blur in the Vividness of Mental Imagery

BackgroundVisual mental imagery or "seeing with the minds eye" is an everyday phenomenon. Visual mental imagery and visual perception share common neural-networks. Hence deficits that affect the visual perception may also affect visual mental imagery. AimWe aimed to study the effect of refractive blur on the vividness of mental imagery. MethodsSubjects were recruited from volunteers and divided into two groups; individuals with refractive errors-Ametropes(AM), and individuals without refractive errors - Emmetropes(EM). After filling in the Verbalizer-Visualizer-Questionnaire (VVQ), the subjects were asked to perform a mental imagery task with and without refractive blur. The participants were asked to generate a mental image of a specific object initially with eyes closed, eyes open and then with refractive blur in random order, and then judge the vividness of the mental image on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (low vividness) to 5 (good vividness). The EM participants had to wear a + 2D spectacles to produce refractive blur. ResultsA total of 162 participants were recruited to the study. Of these 73 were EM and 89 were AM. Of the AM, 30 had additional astigmatism. The mean VVQ score was 64.9(11.2). The mean refractive error was 1.8(1.3)D. Following the mental imagery task, at baseline with eyes closed, 138 (85.5%)subjects had vivid mental imagery close to visual perception(Likert scale:5). With the opening of the eyes, the vividness dropped by at least 1 point in the Likert scale in 139(85.8%). With the introduction of refractive blur, 153(94.4%) subjects had a drop in the vividness of the image by at least 1 point and 22(13.6%) subjects by at least 2 points. ConclusionIntroduction of refractory blur results in the reduction of the vividness of mental imagery.

neuroscience↗

Human papillomavirus 16 E6 and E7 synergistically repress innate immune gene transcription

Human papillomaviruses are causative agents in 5% of all cancers, including the majority of anogenital and oropharyngeal cancers. Downregulation of innate immune genes (IIGs) by HPV to promote the viral life cycle is well documented; E6 and E7 are known repressors of these genes. More recently we demonstrated that E2 could also repress IIGs. These studies have been carried out in cells over-expressing the viral proteins and to further investigate the role of individual viral proteins in this repression we introduced stop codons into E6 and/or E7 in the entire HPV16 genome and generated N/Tert-1 cells stably maintaining the HPV16 genomes. We demonstrate that E6 or E7 individually are not sufficient to repress IIG expression in the context of the entire HPV16 genome, both are required for a synergistic repression. The DNA damage response (DDR) is activated by HPV16 irrespective of E6 and E7 expression, presumably due to viral replication; E1 is a known activator of the DDR. In addition, replication stress was apparent in the HPV16 positive cells lacking E6 and E7, manifested by attenuated cellular growth and activation of replication stress genes. These studies lead us to the following model. Viral replication per se can activate the DDR following infection, and this activation is a known inducer of IIG expression which could induce cellular senescence. To combat this, E6 and E7 synergistically combine to manipulate the DDR and actively repress innate immune gene expression promoting cellular growth; neither protein by itself is able to do this. ImportanceThe role of HPV16 in human cancers is well established; however, to date there are no anti-viral therapeutics that are available for combatting these cancers. To identify such targets, we must enhance understanding of the viral life cycle. Innate immune genes (IIGs) are repressed by HPV16, and we have reported that this repression persists through to cancer. Reversal of this repression would boost the immune response to HPV16 positive tumors, an area that is becoming more important given the advances in immunotherapy. This report demonstrates that E6 and E7 synergistically repress IIG expression in the context of the entire HPV16 genome. Removal of either protein activates the expression of IIGs by HPV16. Therefore, gaining a precise understanding of how the viral oncogenes repress IIG expression represents an opportunity to reverse this repression and boost the immune response to HPV16 infections for therapeutic gain.

molecular biology↗

SAMHD1 regulates human papillomavirus 16 induced cell proliferation and viral replication during differentiation of oral keratinocytes.

Human papillomaviruses induce a host of anogenital cancers, and also oropharyngeal cancer (HPV+OPC); HPV16 is causative in around 90% of HPV+OPC. Using TERT immortalized \"normal\" oral keratinocytes (NOKs) we have identified significant host gene reprogramming by HPV16 (NOKs+HPV16), and demonstrated that NOKs+HPV16 support late stages of the viral life cycle. Expression of the cellular dNTPase and homologous recombination factor SAMHD1 is transcriptionally regulated by HPV16 in NOKs, and here we demonstrate that E6 and E7 regulate expression of SAMHD1 at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. CRISPR/Cas9 removal of SAMHD1 from NOKs and NOKs+HPV16 demonstrate that SAMHD1 controls cell proliferation of NOKs only in the presence of HPV16; deletion of SAMHD1 promotes hyper-proliferation of NOKs+HPV16 cells in organotypic raft cultures but has no effect on NOKs. Viral replication is also elevated in the absence of SAMHD1. This new system has allowed us to identify a specific interaction between SAMHD1 and HPV16 that regulates host cell proliferation and viral replication; such studies are problematic in non-immortalized primary oral keratinocytes due to their limited lifespan. To confirm the relevance of our results we repeated the analysis with human tonsil keratinocytes immortalized by HPV16 (HTK16) and observe the same hyper-proliferative phenotype following CRISPR/Cas9 editing of SAMHD1. Identical results were obtained with three independent CRISPR/Cas9 guide RNAs. The isogenic pairing of NOKs with NOKs+HPV16, combined with HTK16, presents a unique system to identify host genes whose products functionally interact with HPV16 to regulate host cellular growth in oral keratinocytes.\n\nImportanceHead and neck cancer is the sixth most common cancer worldwide. The incidence of HPV+OPC has been rising steadily since the 1970s and has recently reached epidemic proportions, according to the WHO. Upwards of 70% of the 600,000 new OPC cases per year are HPV positive, with high-risk type 16 present in 90% of those incidences. A better understanding of the viral life cycle will facilitate the development of novel therapeutics to combat this ongoing epidemic, as well as other HPV positive cancers. Here we present a unique oral keratinocyte model to identify host proteins that specifically interact with HPV16. Using this system, we report that a cellular gene, SAMHD1, is regulated by HPV16 at the RNA and protein level in oral keratinocytes. Elimination of SAMHD1 from these cells using CRISPR/Cas9 editing promotes enhanced cellular proliferation by HPV16 in oral keratinocytes and elevated viral replication, but not in keratinocytes that do not have HPV16. Our study demonstrates a specific intricate interplay between HPV16 and SAMHD1 during the viral life cycle and establishes a unique model system to assist exploring host factors critical for HPV pathogenesis.

cancer biology↗