Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Porada, D. K.

Publications and source records attributed to Porada, D. K..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Whither unisensory olfactory cortex: processing of visual and auditory stimuli in olfactory cortex, independently of odor associations

Primary sensory cortices have been demonstrated to process sensory input from non-preferred sensory modalities, e.g. primary visual cortex reacting to auditory stimulation, bringing their presumed sensory specificity into question. Whether this reflects processing of the non-preferred stimulus per se or originates from cross-modal associations is debated. Visual/auditory objects typically have strong reciprocal associations; hence, it is difficult to address this question in these modalities. Here, we attempt to dissociate between the two competing hypotheses of whether this form of activation in primary cortices is caused by unisensory processing or cross-modal associations by turning to the olfactory system where cross-modal associations are generally weaker. Using unisensory visual and auditory objects with odor associations ranging from none to strong, we show that the posterior piriform cortex, an area known to process odor objects, is activated by both sounds and pictures of objects. Critically, this activation is independent of the objects odor associations, thereby demonstrating that the activity is not due to cross-modal associations. Using a Floyd-Warshall algorithm, we further show that the amygdala mediate condition-relevant information between the posterior piriform cortex and both the auditory and visual object-oriented cortices. Importantly, we replicate past findings of clear crossmodal processing in the visual and auditory systems. Our study demonstrates processing of non-olfactory input in olfactory cortices that is independent of cross-modal associations and contributes to a more nuanced view of modality specificity in olfactory, auditory, and visual cortices.

neuroscience↗

Sensory Loss Enhances Multisensory Integration Performance

Auditory and visual sensory loss has repeatedly been shown to alter abilities in remaining sensory modalities. It is, however, unclear whether sensory loss also impacts multisensory integration; an ability that is fundamental for the perception of the world around us. We determined effects of olfactory sensory deprivation on multisensory perception by assessing temporal as well as semantic aspects of audio-visual integration in 37 individuals with anosmia (complete olfactory sensory loss) and 37 healthy, matched controls. Participants performed a simultaneity judgement task to determine the temporal binding window, and a multisensory object identification task with individually degraded, dynamic visual, auditory, and audio-visual stimuli. Individuals with anosmia demonstrated an increased ability to detect multisensory temporal asynchronies, represented by a narrowing of the audio-visual temporal binding window. Furthermore, individuals with congenital, but not acquired, anosmia demonstrated indications of greater benefits from bimodal, as compared to unimodal, stimulus presentation when faced with degraded, semantic information. This suggests that the absence of the olfactory sense alters multisensory integration of remaining senses by sharpening the perception of cross-modal temporal violations, independent of sensory loss etiology. In addition, congenital sensory loss may further lead to increased gain from multisensory, compared to unisensory, information. Taken together, multisensory compensatory mechanisms at different levels of perceptual complexity are present in individuals with anosmia.

neuroscience↗