Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ponikarovskaya, N.

Publications and source records attributed to Ponikarovskaya, N..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Comparative evaluation of four exome enrichment solutions in 2024: Agilent, Roche, Vazyme and Nanodigmbio

Whole exome sequencing (WES) is essential for identifying genetic variants linked to diseases. This study compares available to date four exome enrichment kits: Agilent SureSelect Human All Exon v8, Roche KAPA HyperExome Probes, Vazyme VAHTS Target Capture Core Exome Panel, and Nanodigmbio NEXome Plus Panel v1. We evaluated target design, coverage statistics, and variant calling accuracy across these four different exome capture products. All kits showed high coverage completeness, with mean x10 coverage exceeding 97.5% and x20 coverage above 95%. Roche exhibited the most uniform coverage, indicated by the lowest fold-80 scores, while Nanodigmbio had more on-target reads due to fewer off-target reads. Variant calling performance, evaluated using in-lab standard E701 DNA sample, showed high recall rates for all kits, especially Agilent v8. All kits achieved an F-measure above 95.87%. Nanodigmbio had the highest precision with the fewest false positives but a slightly lower F-measure than other kits. This study also highlights the performance of new Chinese solutions from Vazyme and Nanodigmbio, which were comparable to Agilent v8 and Roche KAPA kits. These findings assist researchers and clinicians in selecting appropriate exome capture solutions.

genomics↗

Performance Comparison Of Agilent New SureSelect All Exon v8 Probes With v7 Probes For Exome Sequencing

Exome sequencing may become routine in health care it increases the chance of pinpointing the genetic cause of an individual patients condition and thus making an accurate diagnosis. It is important for facilities providing genetic services to keep track of changes in the technology of exome capture in order to maximize throughput while reducing cost per sample. In this study, we focused on comparing the newly released exome probe set Agilent SureSelect Human All Exon v8 and the previous probe set v7. In preparation for higher throughput of exome sequencing using the DNBSEQ-G400, we evaluated target design, coverage statistics, and variants across these two different exome capture products. Although the target size of the v8 design has not changed much compared to the v7 design (35.24 Mb vs 35.8 Mb), the v8 probe design allows you to call more of SNVs (+3.06%) and indels (+8.49%) with the same number of raw reads per sample on the common target regions (34.84 Mb). Our results suggest that the new Agilent v8 probe set for exome sequencing yields better data quality than the current Agilent v7 set.

genomics↗