Biology subjects

Pomarol-Clotet, E.

Publications and source records attributed to Pomarol-Clotet, E..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Structural Brain Network Alterations in Relation to Treatment and Illness Severity in Bipolar Disorder

BackgroundLarge-scale T1-weighted MRI studies have established grey-matter abnormalities in bipolar disorder (BD), with our group contributing to consensus findings. However, structural connectivity, particularly within emotion- and reward-related circuits, remains poorly understood. Diffusion-weighted MRI (dMRI) enables investigation of white-matter pathways, yet prior work is constrained by small samples, methodological heterogeneity, and unclear medication effects. We conducted the largest dMRI network analysis in BD, relating symptom burden and polypharmacy to tractography-derived connectivity and graph-theoretic metrics. MethodsCross-sectional structural and diffusion MRI scans from 449 individuals with BD (35.7{+/-}12.6 years) and 510 controls (33.3{+/-}12.6 years), aged 18-65, were analyzed across 16 ENIGMA-BD sites. Standardized segmentation/parcellation and constrained spherical deconvolution tractography generated individual structural connectivity matrices. Graph-theoretic metrics of global and subnetwork organization were related to symptom severity and medications. ResultsBD showed widespread network alterations (lower density and efficiency, longer path length, and higher betweenness centrality), altered microstructural organization in a limbic-basal ganglia circuit, and abnormal streamline counts in a default-mode/salience/fronto-limbic-basal ganglia network. Longer illness duration, later onset, and psychosis history were associated with greater abnormalities in network architecture, whereas more manic episodes were associated with greater fronto-limbic connectivity. Antidepressant (particularly SSRI), anticonvulsant, and antipsychotic use related to poorer global and fronto-limbic connectivity; no clear lithium effects emerged. ConclusionsAs the largest structural connectivity study in BD, we reveal widespread disruption in reward and emotion-regulation networks influenced by illness severity and medication use. Results show that multisite harmonization is feasible and highlight ENIGMA-BD as a scalable framework for identifying reproducible neurobiological markers.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2025

A Scalable Toolkit for Modeling 3D Surface-based Brain Geometry

3D surface-based computational mapping is more sensitive to localized brain alterations in neurological, developmental and psychiatric conditions than traditional gross volumetric analysis, providing fine-scale 3D maps of a wide range of surface-based features. Here we introduce a scalable toolkit for large-scale computational surface analysis, with efficient algorithms for multisite data integration, statistical harmonization, accelerated multivariate statistics, and visualization. We showcase the utility of the toolkit by mapping subcortical shape variations and factors that affect them across 21 international samples from the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorder Working Group (N=3,373).

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2025

Brain neuromarkers predict self- and other-related mentalizing across adult, clinical, and developmental samples

Human social interactions rely on the ability to reflect on ones own and others internal states and traits--a process known as mentalizing. Impaired or altered mentalizing is a hallmark of multiple psychiatric and neurodevelopmental conditions. Yet, replicable and easily testable brain markers of mentalizing have so far been lacking. Here, we apply an interpretable machine learning approach to multiple datasets (total N=390) to train and validate fMRI brain signatures that predict i) mentalizing about the self, ii) mentalizing about another person, and iii) both types of mentalizing. Self-mentalizing and other-mentalizing classifiers had positive weights in anterior/medial and posterior/lateral brain areas, respectively, with accuracy rates of 82% and 77% for out-of-sample prediction. The classifier trained across both types of mentalizing showed 98% predictive accuracy and separated (mental) attributional from factual inferences. Classifier patterns revealed better self/other separation in healthy adults compared to individuals with schizophrenia and with increasing age in adolescence. Together, our findings reveal consistent and separable neural patterns subserving trait-based mentalizing about self and others--present at least from the age of adolescence and functionally altered in severe neuropsychiatric disorders. These mentalizing signatures hold promise as candidate neuromarkers of social-cognitive processes in different contexts and clinical conditions. Author NoteThis work was funded by a Starting Grant from the European Research Council (ERC, 101041087) to LKo, a German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) doctoral grant and a Network of European Neuroscience Schools (NENS) exchange fellowship to DA, an R01 grant from the U.S. National Institutes of Mental Health (R01MH125414-01) to JAH and DAS, a Junior Leader Fellowship from "la Caixa" Foundation (LCF/BQ/PR22/11920017) to PFC, a Consolidator Grant from the European Research Council (ERC, 648082) to LKr, R37, R01 support from the U.S. National Institutes of Mental Health (R37MH076136 to TDW, MH116026 to TDW and L. Chang [PI], R01EB026549 to TDW and M. Lindquist [MPIs]), an NIMH grant (P50MH094258-01A1) to R. Adolphs, and a CIC Brain and Mental Health Chair from the Neurodis foundation to AT. LvdM acknowledges a European Science Foundation EURYI grant (044035001) that funded her doctoral studies (PI: A. Aleman). Views and opinions expressed are however those of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Research Council. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them. The funders had no role in study design, data analysis, manuscript preparation, or publication decisions.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2024

Sex differences in deep brain shape and asymmetry persist across schizophrenia and healthy individuals: A meta-analysis from the ENIGMA-Schizophrenia Working Group

BackgroundSchizophrenia (SCZ) is characterized by a disconnect from reality that manifests as various clinical and cognitive symptoms, and persistent neurobiological abnormalities. Sex-related differences in clinical presentation imply separate brain substrates. The present study characterized deep brain morphology using shape features to understand the independent effects of diagnosis and sex on the brain, and to determine whether the neurobiology of schizophrenia varies as a function of sex. MethodsThis study analyzed multi-site archival data from 1,871 male (M) and 955 female (F) participants with SCZ, and 2,158 male and 1,877 female healthy controls (CON) from twenty-three cross-sectional samples from the ENIGMA Schizophrenia Workgroup. Harmonized shape analysis protocols were applied to each sites data for seven deep brain regions obtained from T1-weighted structural MRI scans. Effect sizes were calculated for the following main contrasts: 1) Sex effects;2) Diagnosis-by-Sex interaction; 3) within sex tests of diagnosis; 4) within diagnosis tests of sex differences. Meta-regression models between brain structure and clinical variables were also computed separately in men and women with schizophrenia. ResultsMass univariate meta-analyses revealed more concave-than-convex shape differences in all regions for women relative to men, across diagnostic groups (d = -0.35 to 0.20, SE = 0.02 to 0.07); there were no significant diagnosis-by-sex interaction effects. Within men and women separately, we identified more-concave-than-convex shape differences for the hippocampus, amygdala, accumbens, and thalamus, with more-convex-than-concave differences in the putamen and pallidum in SCZ (d = -0.30 to 0.30, SE = 0.03 to 0.10). Within CON and SZ separately, we found more-concave-than-convex shape differences in the thalamus, pallidum, putamen, and amygdala among females compared to males, with mixed findings in the hippocampus and caudate (d = -0.30 to 0.20, SE = 0.03 to 0.09). Meta-regression models revealed similarly small, but significant relationships, with medication and positive symptoms in both SCZ-M and SCZ-F. ConclusionsSex-specific variation is an overriding feature of deep brain shape regardless of disease status, underscoring persistent patterns of sex differences observed both within and across diagnostic categories, and highlighting the importance of including it as a critical variable in studies of neurobiology. Future work should continue to explore these dimensions independently to determine whether these patterns of brain morphology extend to other aspects of neurobiology in schizophrenia, potentially uncovering broader implications for diagnosis and treatment. Key PointsO_LIStatistical analyses revealed significant main effects for diagnosis and sex in deep brain shape morphology. Among patients with schizophrenia, there was a pattern of thinning and surface contraction in the bilateral hippocampus, amygdala, accumbens, and thalamus, and a pattern of significant thickening and surface expansion in the bilateral putamen and pallidum compared to healthy control participants. Between males and females, there was a pattern of significant thinning and surface contraction in the bilateral thalamus, pallidum, putamen, and amygdala in females compared to males. C_LIO_LIThere was no significant interaction between diagnosis and biological sex, suggesting that sex differences in deep brain shape and asymmetry among patients with schizophrenia reflect those observed in healthy individuals. C_LIO_LISmall but statistically significant relationships exist between brain structure and clinical correlates of schizophrenia were similar for both men and women with the disease, such that higher CPZ was associated with shape-derived thinning and surface contraction in the caudate, accumbens, hippocampus, amygdala, and thalamus, and elevated positive symptoms were associated with shape-derived thinning and surface contraction in the bilateral caudate, right hippocampus, and right amygdala. C_LI

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

A Large-Scale ENIGMA Multisite Replication Study of Brain Age in Depression

BackgroundSeveral studies have evaluated whether depressed persons have older appearing brains than their nondepressed peers. However, the estimated neuroimaging-derived "brain age gap" has varied from study to study, likely driven by differences in training and testing sample (size), age range, and used modality/features. To validate our previously developed ENIGMA brain age model and the identified brain age gap, we aim to replicate the presence and effect size estimate previously found in the largest study in depression to date (N=2,126 controls & N=2,675 cases; +1.08 years [SE 0.22], Cohens d=0.14, 95% CI: 0.08-0.20), in independent cohorts that were not part of the original study. MethodsA previously trained brain age model (www.photon-ai.com/enigma_brainage) based on 77 FreeSurfer brain regions of interest was used to obtain unbiased brain age predictions in 751 controls and 766 persons with depression (18-75 years) from 13 new cohorts collected from 20 different scanners. ResultsOur ENIGMA MDD brain age model generalized reasonably well to controls from the new cohorts (predicted age vs. age: r = 0.73, R2=0.47, MAE=7.50 years), although the performance varied from cohort to cohort. In these new cohorts, on average, depressed persons showed a significantly higher brain age gap of +1 year (SE 0.35) (Cohens d{square}={square}{square}.15, 95% CI: 0.05-0.25) compared with controls, highly similar to our previous finding. ConclusionsThis study further validates our previously developed ENIGMA brain age algorithm. Importantly, we replicated the brain age gap in depression with a comparable effect size. Thus, two large-scale independent mega-analyses across in total 32 cohorts and >3,400 patients and >2,800 controls worldwide show reliable but subtle effects of brain aging in adult depression.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

A Method for the Automatic Normalization and 3D Facial Mesh Extraction from Head Magnetic Resonance Imaging

The analysis of 3D facial shape in medicine is motivated by the fact that certain diseases and syndromes are associated to specific facial dysmorphologies. In this context, 3D facial shape analysis constitutes a promising and non-invasive support to traditional diagnostic methods. In this work, we explore the use of head magnetic resonances to obtain accurate 3D facial meshes that enable subsequent facial shape analysis. We present a fully automatic method that normalizes the orientation and alignment of 3D point clouds corresponding to head magnetic resonances by detecting salient facial features. Moreover, using clustering techniques, our method also allows to eliminate noise and artifacts appearing in magnetic resonance imaging. Finally, through bidirectional ray tracing, we obtain a dense 3D facial mesh that accurately captures facial shape. The proposed method has been built and evaluated on a dataset of 185 head magnetic resonances, and it has demonstrated its ability to successfully orient, align and obtain a dense 3D facial mesh with a high accuracy rate.

bioinformatics↗