Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Poinas, I.

Publications and source records attributed to Poinas, I..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Functional trade-offs: exploring the effects of climate change and agricultural practices as drivers of field margin plant communities

Over the past decades, agricultural intensification and climate change have led to vegetation shifts. However, functional trade-offs linking traits responding to climate and farming practices are rarely analyzed, especially on large-scale empirical studies. Here we used a standardized yearly monitoring effort of agricultural field margin flora at the national scale to assess the temporal response of diversity and functional traits to variations in climate and intensity of agricultural practices. We examined temporal trends in climate (temperature, soil moisture), intensity of agricultural practices (herbicides, fertilization, margin management), plant species richness, and community-weighted means and variances of traits expected to vary both with climate and agricultural practices (e.g. seed mass, specific leaf area), across 555 sites in France between 2013 and 2021. We found clear temporal climatic trends (temperature increased while soil moisture decreased), whereas trends in agricultural practices were weak over the past decade, with only slight decreases in herbicides and margin management intensity. During the same period, functional changes in plant communities were significant, showing an increase of thermophilic species (including some Mediterranean species) with a conservative resource acquisition strategy (high stature, late and short flowering), mainly explained by climate change. The reduction in field margin management intensity (mainly mowing), also resulted in a vegetation shift towards a more conservative strategy. In contrast, there was no impact of the slight temporal changes of practices conducted within cultivated fields (herbicides, fertilization) on vegetation changes. Our findings suggest that species adapted to climate change (including Mediterranean and conservative species) have temporally increased in proportion. Importantly, we identified functional trade-offs indicating that these species are also the most vulnerable to intensive agricultural practices, as they are less adapted to high levels of resources and disturbances. We put these results into the conceptual framework of Grimes CSR triangle and revealed a temporal decline of competitive and ruderal species in favor of stress-tolerant species better adapted to climate change. Choosing less intensive management can broaden the functional spectrum of agricultural plant communities, by maintaining the ability of stress-tolerant species selected by climate change to colonize habitats largely dominated by ruderals. Put together, these results suggest that climate change and agricultural intensification could have synergistic negative impacts on plant diversity in field margins, highlighting the need to study several biodiversity drivers at the same time in anthropized landscapes.

ecology↗

Scale dependence in agricultural drivers of field margin plant communities: influence of spatial resolution and extent

In recent decades, agricultural intensification has led to a strong decline in biodiversity. Field margins act as shelters and dispersal corridors for biodiversity in highly disturbed landscapes, and are critical to the maintenance of ecosystem services. However, they are also impacted by agricultural practices in neighbouring fields. Agricultural impacts are often studied at field to landscape scales, and rarely across biogeographic regions. One of the challenges in large-scale studies is the lack of standardized monitoring schemes including both biodiversity and accurate estimation of agricultural practices. Here, we take advantage of a national monitoring scheme in 462 sites in France, to assess the effects of agricultural practices on field margin flora at different extents and resolutions. We used spatial simultaneous autoregressive and generalized dissimilarity models to assess the response of plant richness and composition to climatic, soil and landscape conditions, and to agricultural (fertilization, herbicides) and margin management drivers. Analyses were repeated at the site-level, 40 and 75 km resolutions, and at regional and national extents. We found that the impact of agricultural practices on species richness was most important at the site-level, whereas climate and crop diversity became more important at the 75 km resolution. Compositional variations responded differently, with climate being more important at the site-level, and fertilization and crop diversity at the coarsest resolution. There was a strong variation in the variance explained by models among regions, but climate effects were weaker within biogeographic units compared to the national level, and different agricultural practices stood out as influential in different regions, suggesting that the regional context is fundamental in determining plant community structure. To efficiently conserve biodiversity, we therefore recommend the implementation of agricultural measures adapted to each region.

ecology↗