Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Poesy, C.

Publications and source records attributed to Poesy, C..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

A few genes modulate the ecological impact of a freshwater fish species on food webs and ecosystem functions

Genetic diversity within species can shape food webs and ecosystem functioning as strongly as species diversity, yet the genomic architecture underlying these effects remains unclear. Gene-to-ecosystem relationships may arise from genome-wide diversity, from a limited number of ecologically-important genes, or a combination of both. Experimental tests of these hypotheses are lacking. Here, we manipulated genomic diversity of a top-predatory fish in mesocosms under ambient or warm conditions, and quantified ecological responses spanning fish biomass, prey communities and ecosystem functions. Genome-wide diversity explained few ecological responses, with moderate effects (r=0.260). In contrast, variation at specific candidate SNPs predicted all ecological responses consistently across climatic conditions, with effect sizes being more than twice those of genome-wide estimates (r=0.599). Moreover, combining information from small subsets of candidate SNPs outperformed both single-locus and genome-wide diversity for all ecological responses (r=0.841), consistent with an oligogenic architecture for gene-to-ecosystem relationships. Enrichment analyses revealed functional pathways related to growth, development and metabolic regulation, driven by a small set of pleiotropic genes. We demonstrate that the ecological consequences of intraspecific genetic variation arose from a limited fraction of the genome, highlighting the importance of functional genomic structure, rather than genome-wide diversity alone, in shaping eco-evolutionary dynamics.

ecology↗

GENETIC DIVERSITY AFFECTS ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONS ACROSS TROPHIC LEVELS AS MUCH AS SPECIES DIVERSITY, BUT IN AN OPPOSITE DIRECTION

Understanding the relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning stands as a cornerstone in ecological research. Extensive evidence now underscores the profound impact of species loss on the stability and dynamics of ecosystem functions. However, it remains unclear whether the loss of genetic diversity within key species yield similar consequences. Here, we delve into the intricate relationship between species diversity, genetic diversity, and ecosystem functions across three trophic levels --primary producers, primary consumers, and secondary consumers-- in natural aquatic ecosystems. Our investigation involves estimating species diversity and genome-wide diversity -gauged within three pivotal species-within each trophic level, evaluating seven key ecosystem functions, and analyzing the magnitude of the relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem functions (BEFs). We found that, overall, the absolute effect size of genetic diversity on ecosystem functions mirrors that of species diversity in natural ecosystems. We nonetheless unveil a striking dichotomy: while genetic diversity was positively correlated with various ecosystem functions, species diversity displays a negative correlation with these functions. These intriguing antagonist effects of species and genetic diversity persists across the three trophic levels (underscoring its systemic nature), but were apparent only when BEFs were assessed within trophic levels rather than across them. This study reveals the complexity of predicting the consequences of genetic and species diversity loss under natural conditions, and emphasizes the need for further mechanistic models integrating these two facets of biodiversity.

ecology↗

Intraspecific diversity loss in a predator species alters prey community structure and ecosystem functions

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWLoss in intraspecific diversity can alter ecosystem functions, but the underlying mechanisms are still elusive, and intraspecific biodiversity-ecosystem function relationships (iBEF) have been restrained to primary producers. Here, we manipulated genetic and functional richness of a fish consumer (Phoxinus phoxinus), to test whether iBEF relationships exist in consumer species, and whether they are more likely sustained by genetic or functional richness. We found that both genotypic and functional richness affected ecosystem functioning, either independently or in interaction. Loss in genotypic richness reduced benthic invertebrate diversity consistently across functional richness treatments, whereas it reduced zooplankton diversity only when functional richness was high. Finally, both losses in genotypic and functional richness altered essential functions (e.g. decomposition) through trophic cascades. We concluded that iBEF relationships lead to substantial top-down effects on entire food chains. The loss of genotypic richness impacted ecological properties as much as the loss of functional richness, probably because it sustains "cryptic" functional diversity.

ecology↗

Quantifying The Individual Impact Of Artificial Barriers In Freshwaters: A Standardized And Absolute Index Of Genetic Connectivity

Fragmentation by artificial barriers is an important threat to freshwater biodiversity. Mitigating the negative aftermaths of fragmentation is of crucial importance, and it is now essential for environmental managers to benefit from a precise estimate of the individual impact of weirs and dams on river connectivity. Although the indirect monitoring of fragmentation using molecular data constitutes a promising approach, it is plagued with several constraints preventing a standardized and individual quantification of barrier effects. Indeed, observed levels of genetic differentiation depend on both the age of the obstacle and the effective size of the populations it separates, making difficult comparisons of the actual barrier effect of different obstacles. Here, we developed a standardized genetic index of fragmentation (FINDEX), allowing an absolute and independent assessment of the individual effects of obstacles on connectivity. The FINDEX is the standardized ratio (expressed as a percentage) between the observed genetic differentiation between pairs of populations located on either side of an obstacle and the genetic differentiation expected if this obstacle completely prevented gene flow. The expected genetic differentiation is calculated from simulations taking into account two nuisance parameters: the number of generations since barrier creation (the age of the obstacle) and the expected heterozygosity of the targeted populations, a proxy for effective population sizes. Using both simulated and published empirical datasets, we explored and discussed the validity and the limits of the FINDEX. We demonstrated that it allows quantifying genetic effects of fragmentation only from a few generations after barrier creation and provides valid comparisons among populations (or species) of different effective populations sizes and obstacles of different ages. The computation of the FINDEX requires a minimum amount of fieldwork and genotypic data, and solves some of the difficulties inherent to the study of artificial fragmentation in rivers and potentially in other ecosystems. This makes the FINDEX a promising and objective tool for managers aiming at at planning restoration programs and at evaluating the efficiency of these programs.

ecology↗