Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Piradov, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Piradov, M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Action in auctions: neural and computational mechanisms of bidding behavior

Competition for resources is a fundamental characteristic of evolution. Auctions have been widely used to model competition of individuals for resources, and bidding behavior plays a major role in social competition. Yet how humans learn to bid efficiently remains an open question. We used model-based neuroimaging to investigate the neural mechanisms of bidding behavior under different types of competition. Twenty-seven subjects (nine male) played a prototypical bidding game: a double action, with three \"market\" types, which differed in the number of competitors. We compared different computational learning models of bidding: directional learning models (DL), where the model bid is \"nudged\" depending on whether it was accepted or rejected, along with standard reinforcement learning models (RL). We found that DL fit the behavior best and resulted in higher payoffs. We found the binary learning signal associated with DL to be represented by neural activity in the striatum distinctly posterior to a weaker reward prediction error signal. We posited that DL is an efficient heuristic for valuation when the action (bid) space is continuous. Indeed, we found that the posterior parietal cortex represents the continuous action-space of the task, and the frontopolar prefrontal cortex distinguishes among conditions of social competition. Based on our findings we proposed a conceptual model that accounts for a sequence of processes that are required to perform successful and flexible bidding under different types of competition.

neuroscience↗

A Russian validation study of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R)

Introduction: The aim of the present study was to validate a Russian adaptation of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R).\n\nSubjects and methods: We evaluated 58 patients diagnosed with chronic disorders of consciousness (>4 weeks post-injury, DOC) of various etiology and two patients in a locked-in state at different time points in their post-comatose recovery. We tested sensitivity for changes over 1 week, reliability, as well as criterion validity and diagnostic sensitivity of the Russian adaptation of the CRS-R in comparison with the Russian adaptations of Full Outline of UnResponsiveness Score (FOUR), and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS).\n\nResults: We obtained good sensitivity for changes in neurological status over one week (p<0.0001) and good test-retest reliability (r=1, p<0.0001) of the CRS-R. Inter-rater reliability for the CRS-R total score ({kappa}=0.99, p<0.001) and subscale scores was good. We showed high internal consistency (=0.87 and 0.89 for the first and second visit respectively). We also showed good criterion validity between two other standardized behavioral scales (moderate correlation with GCS, r=0.597 and high correlation with FOUR Score, r=0.900). CRS-R also demonstrated a significantly higher sensitivity in differential diagnosis of DOC, as compared to GCS, and FOUR Score (p<0.001).\n\nConclusion: The results show that the Russian version of the CRS-R is a valid and sensitive tool for the evaluation of severely brain damaged patients with chronic DOC which can be used for differential diagnosis and for the assessment of dynamic recovery.

neuroscience↗