Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Pipoly, I.

Publications and source records attributed to Pipoly, I..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Veterinary insecticides in wild bird nests: emerging contaminants in urban and protected forest habitats

Veterinary ectoparasiticides widely used on companion animals often contain synthetic insecticides whose agricultural applications have been restricted in the European Union because of environmental concerns. These neurotoxic compounds can persist on animal fur and enter surrounding environments, potentially exposing non-target organisms. The Great Tit (Parus major), a common passerine in both urban and forest habitats, frequently incorporates animal fur in nest linings, thereby creating a potential exposure route for breeding adults and nestlings. We analysed fur-containing nest material collected from 63 Great Tit nests in artificial nest boxes at an urban site and a nearby protected forest in Hungary during the 2025 breeding season, sampling at mid-nestling stage and also after fledging. Using HPLC-MS/MS and GC-MS, we detected several veterinary ectoparasiticides in nest materials, including fipronil, fipronil sulfone, imidacloprid, and permethrin. Acetamiprid was found only in urban nests, indicating additional, non-veterinary environmental sources. Multiple insecticides were present in nest material, with higher contamination levels and greater compound diversity in urban compared to forest nests. Residues were present at both sampling times but declined over the course of the breeding cycle. Although contamination was not associated with the measured reproductive parameters of Great Tits, our findings show that veterinary ectoparasiticides can contaminate wild bird nests, including those in protected forest ecosystems. This highlights a previously under-recognised pathway linking companion animal treatments to wildlife exposure and underscores the need to assess the ecological risks and trade-offs associated with widespread veterinary insecticide use. HighlightsO_LIVeterinary ectoparasiticides were detected in urban and forest Great Tit nests C_LIO_LIUrban nests contained higher contamination levels and greater compound diversity C_LIO_LIAcetamiprid occurred only in urban nests, indicating additional environmental inputs C_LIO_LIProtected forests also exposed to fipronil, fipronil sulfone and permethrin C_LIO_LIBird nests reveal an overlooked pathway linking pet treatments to wildlife exposure C_LI

ecology↗

Demographic pathways linking sex-chromosome system to adult sex ratio variation across tetrapods

Sex chromosomes determine male and female phenotypes, and the resulting sex differences can have significant impacts on ecology and life history. One manifestation of this link is that ZZ/ZW sex-determination systems are associated with more male-skewed adult sex ratio (ASR, proportion of males in the adult population) than XY/XX systems across tetrapods (amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals). Here we investigate four demographic processes: male and female offspring production, sex differences in juvenile and adult mortalities and in timing of maturation that can contribute to ASR variation between XY/XX and ZZ/ZW systems, using phylogenetic analyses of a large dataset collected from tetrapod species in the wild. We show that sex differences in adult mortality reliably predict ASR, and it is also more male-biased in XY/XX species than in ZZ/ZW species. Sex differences in juvenile mortality or in maturation time also contribute to ASR skews, but do not differ consistently between XY/XX and ZZ/ZW systems. Phylogenetic path analyses confirm an influence of sex-determination system on ASR through sex-biased adult mortality. Thus, these results infer that sex chromosomes can impact, via demographic pathways, frequency-dependent selection emerging from the relative number of males and females. We call for follow-up studies to uncover the potentially complex web of associations between sex determination, population dynamics, and social behaviour.

evolutionary biology↗

Does offspring sex ratio differ between urban and forest populations of great tits (Parus major)?

Since male and female offspring may have different costs and benefits, parents may use sex ratio adjustment to increase their fitness under different environmental conditions. Urban habitats provide poorer conditions for nestling development in many birds. Therefore, we investigated whether great tits (Parus major) produce different brood sex ratios in urban and natural habitats. We determined the sex of nestlings of 126 broods in two urban and two forest habitats between 2012 and 2014 by molecular sexing. We found that brood sex ratio did not differ significantly between urban and forest habitats either at egg-laying or near fledging. Male offspring were larger than females in both habitats. This latter result suggests that male offspring may be more costly to raise than females, yet our findings suggest that urban great tits do not produce more daughters despite the unfavourable breeding conditions. This raises the possibility that other aspects of urban life, such as better post-fledging survival, might favour males and thereby compensate for the extra energetic costs of producing male offspring.

ecology↗

Effects of extreme hot weather on the reproductive output of great tits (Parus major, L.) in urban and natural habitats

Climate change and urbanization are among the most salient human-induced changes affecting Earths biota. Extreme weather events can have high biological impacts and are becoming more frequent recently. In cities, the urban heat island can amplify the intensity and frequency of hot weather events. However, the joint effects of heat events and urban microclimate on wildlife are unclear, as urban populations may either suffer more from increased heat stress or become adapted to warmer temperatures. Here we test whether the effects of hot weather on reproductive success of great tits (Parus major) are exacerbated or dampened in urban environments compared to forest habitats. By studying two urban and two forest populations over six years, we show that 14-16 days-old nestlings have smaller body mass and tarsus length, and suffer increased mortality when they experience a higher number of hot days during the nestling period. The negative effects of hot weather on body mass and survival are significantly stronger in forests than in urban areas, where these effects are dampened or even reversed. These results suggest that urban birds are less vulnerable to extreme hot weather conditions than their non-urban conspecifics, possibly by adaptively evolving or flexibly adjusting nestling physiology to tolerate heat stress, and/or by adjusting parental behavior in response to heat. This finding highlights that endothermic vertebrates may be able to adapt to heat stress, which may help their populations cope with the joint challenges of climate change and urbanization. Significance statementExtreme weather events are becoming more frequent due to climate change and can have substantial effects on reproduction and survival of wild animals. Urban heat island can amplify the frequency of extreme hot weather events, making it potentially more harmful for city-dwelling organisms. Alternatively, urban populations living in warmer environments may adapt to better tolerate heat. We investigated these alternatives by comparing nestling development and survival between urban and forest great tit (Parus major) populations. We found that urban populations are less vulnerable to heat: nestling body mass and survival decreased rapidly with the increasing number of hot days in forests, while these effects were dampened in urban broods. Thus, urban populations may become adapted to better tolerate heat events.

ecology↗

Higher frequency of extra-pair offspring in urban than forest broods of great tits (Parus major)

Urbanization increasingly changes the ecological conditions for wild animal populations, influencing their demography, reproduction, and behaviour. While studies on the ecological consequences of urbanization frequently document a reduced number and poorer body condition of offspring in urban than in non-urban bird populations, consequences for other components of reproduction are rarely investigated. Mating with partners outside the social pair-bond is widespread in birds, and although theory predicts that the occurrence of extra-pair fertilizations (EPF) may be sensitive to the altered ecological conditions of cities, the effect of urbanization on EPF is poorly known. Here we used data from two urban and two forest populations collected over three years to test whether the frequency of extra-pair offspring (EPO) in great tit broods differed between the habitats. We found that significantly more broods contained EPO in urban habitats (48.9 %) than in forests (24.4 %). In broods with EPO, the number and proportion of EPO was similar in urban and forest broods. These results suggest that females that live in urban habitats are more likely to engage in EPF than those living in forests. Urban environments may either 1) provide more spatiotemporal opportunities to EPF because of higher breeding density and lower or more constant caterpillar supply in cities compared to natural habitats, or 2) enhance the benefits of EPF via increased fertility or due to disrupted quality signals caused by anthropogenic pollution. In addition, 3) females with higher propensity to engage in EPF may more likely settle in urban habitats.

ecology↗