Phung, T. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2018

Identifying, understanding, and correcting technical biases on the sex chromosomes in next-generation sequencing data

Mammalian X and Y chromosomes share a common evolutionary origin and retain regions of high sequence similarity. This sequence homology can cause the mismapping of short sequencing reads derived from the sex chromosomes and affect variant calling and other downstream analyses. Understanding and correcting this problem is critical for medical genomics and population genomic inference. Here, we characterize how sequence homology can affect analyses on the sex chromosomes and present XYalign, a new tool that: (1) facilitates the inference of sex chromosome complement from next-generation sequencing data; (2) corrects erroneous read mapping on the sex chromosomes; and (3) tabulates and visualizes important metrics for quality control such as mapping quality, sequencing depth, and allele balance. We show how these metrics can be used to identify XX and XY individuals across diverse sequencing experiments, including low and high coverage whole genome sequencing, and exome sequencing. We also show that XYalign corrects mismapped reads on the sex chromosomes, resulting in more accurate variant calling. Finally, we discuss how the flexibility of the XYalign framework can be leveraged for other use cases including the identification of aneuploidy on the autosomes. XYalign is available open source under the GNU General Public License (version 3).

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2017

Comparison of single genome and allele frequency data reveals discordant demographic histories

Inference of demographic history from genetic data is a primary goal of population genetics of model and non-model organisms. Whole genome-based approaches such as the Pairwise/Multiple Sequentially Markovian Coalescent (PSMC/MSMC) methods use genomic data from one to four individuals to infer the demographic history of an entire population, while site frequency spectrum (SFS)-based methods use the distribution of allele frequencies in a sample to reconstruct the same historical events. Although both methods are extensively used in empirical studies and perform well on data simulated under simple models, there have been only limited comparisons of them in more complex and realistic settings. Here we use published demographic models based on data from three human populations (Yoruba (YRI), descendants of northwest-Europeans (CEU), and Han Chinese (CHB)) as an empirical test case to study the behavior of both inference procedures. We find that several of the demographic histories inferred by the whole genome-based methods do not predict the genome-wide distribution of heterozygosity nor do they predict the empirical SFS. However, using simulated data, we also find that the whole genome methods can reconstruct the complex demographic models inferred by SFS-based methods, suggesting that the discordant patterns of genetic variation are not attributable to a lack of statistical power, but may reflect unmodeled complexities in the underlying demography. More generally, our findings indicate that demographic inference from a small number of genomes, routine in genomic studies of nonmodel organisms, should be interpreted cautiously, as these models cannot recapitulate other summaries of the data.

evolutionary biology↗