Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Perrine, W.

Publications and source records attributed to Perrine, W..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Diet driven differences in host tolerance are linked to shifts in global gene expression in a common avian host-pathogen system

As humans alter the landscape, wildlife have become increasingly dependent on anthropogenic resources, altering interactions between individuals and subsequently disease transmission dynamics. Further, nutritional quantity and quality greatly impact an individual hosts immune capacity and ability to mitigate damage caused by infectious disease. Thus, understanding the impact of dietary nutrition on immune function is critical for predicting disease severity and transmission as human activity both facilitates the dispersal of pathogens and alters dietary options for wildlife. Here, we use transcriptomics to explore the previously unstudied molecular mechanisms underpinning diet-driven differences in pathogen tolerance using a widespread avian bacterial pathogen, Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG). MG is an ideal model for understanding the dietary drivers of disease as the human supplementation that wild birds commonly rely on, bird feeders, are also an important source for MG transmission. Significant diet-driven differences in the expression of many genes encoding immune response and translational machinery proteins are seen both in the absence of MG and during the recovery period. Prior to infection, protein-fed birds are more transcriptionally primed for infection than lipid-fed birds which translates to greater tolerance in protein-fed birds during the recovery period. Given the significant importance of human supplemented food in wildlife disease systems, the molecular mechanisms by which interactions between diet and infection emerge provide insight into the ecological and immunological consequences of human behavior and wildlife disease.

ecology↗

Male pathology regardless of behaviour drives transmission in an avian host-pathogen system

Host sex is an important source of heterogeneity in the severity of epidemics. Pinpointing the mechanisms causing this heterogeneity can be difficult because differences in behaviour among sexes (e.g. greater territorial aggression in males) can bias exposure risk, obfuscating the role of immune function, which can lead to differences in pathology, in driving differential susceptibility between sexes. Thus, sex-biased transmission driven by differences in immune function independent of behaviour is poorly understood, especially in non-mammalian systems. Here we examine the previously unexplored potential for male-biased pathology to affect transmission using an avian host-pathogen system. We employ a sex-dependent multistate transmission model parameterized with isolated, individual-based experimental exposures of domestic canaries and experimental transmission data of house finches. The experiment revealed that male birds have shorter incubation periods, longer recovery periods, higher pathogen burdens, and greater disease pathology, than females. Our model revealed that male-biased pathology led to epidemic size rapidly increasing with the proportion of male birds, with a nearly 16-fold increase in total epidemic size from an all-female to an all-male simulation. Our results demonstrate that female-biased resistance, independent of male behaviour, can drive sex-dependent transmission in wildlife, indicating that sex-based differences in immune function, not just differences in exposure risk, can shape epidemic dynamics.

ecology↗