Biology subjects

Perez-Ortin, J. E.

Publications and source records attributed to Perez-Ortin, J. E..

13 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

eIF5A coordinates the transcription and translation of its target genes

Maintaining balanced cellular protein levels requires precise control of gene expression and effective coordination between the various stages of the process, from transcription to translation. In recent years, several components of the translation apparatus have been found in the nuclei of various eukaryotes, where they regulate transcription, mRNA processing or export, thereby integrating different stages of gene expression. eIF5A is an essential and evolutionarily conserved translation elongation factor that is involved in viral infection and in the development of diseases such as cancer and neurodevelopmental disorders. eIF5A promotes translation elongation by binding to ribosomes that stall at codons encoding problematic amino acids for peptide bond formation, such as consecutive prolines, also known as polyproline motifs. Although eIF5A shuttles between the nucleus and cytoplasm, its specific nuclear roles remain poorly defined. Here, we demonstrate that nuclear yeast eIF5A binds to chromatin and represses gene transcription by preventing the binding of RNA polymerase II. Importantly, chromatin binding and transcriptional repression by eIF5A have a higher impact on genes encoding its own translational targets. The presence of polyproline motifs in genes imposes both translation and transcriptional control by eIF5A. Furthermore, eIF5As active engagement in cytoplasmic translation is necessary for its role in repressing transcription. Our results suggest that eIF5A coordinates gene expression by promoting the cytoplasmic translation of specific genes while repressing their transcription in the nucleus, thus ensuring efficient final protein synthesis. Significance StatementOur study provides genome-wide and gene-specific evidence supporting the role of the translation elongation factor eIF5A in transcription. eIF5A is essential in eukaryotes, facilitating the translation of mRNAs encoding stretches of problematic amino acids, such as consecutive prolines. Through its role in the synthesis of specific proteins, eIF5A has been linked to development and different diseases, including cancer and diabetes. We have now discovered that eIF5A also controls the transcription of its translation target genes and this effect is driven by the presence of eIF5A-dependent motifs at their sequences. In the nucleus, eIF5A binds to specific genes and attenuates the binding of RNA polymerase II. By negatively regulating transcription and positively regulating translation, eIF5A coordinates gene expression, fine-tuning protein levels.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2025

Regulation of transcription elongation anticipates alternative gene expression strategies across the cell cycle

A growing body of evidence supports the idea that RNA polymerase II (RNAP II) activity during transcription elongation can be regulated to control transcription rates. Using genomic run-on and RNAP II chromatin immunoprecipitation, we measured both active and total RNAP II across the bodies of genes at three different stages of the mitotic cell cycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: G1, S, and G2/M. Comparison of active and total RNAP II levels at these stages revealed distinct patterns of transcription elongation control throughout the cell cycle. Previously characterized cycling genes were associated with some of these elongation patterns. A cluster of genes with highly divergent genomic run-on and RNAP II chromatin immunoprecipitation patterns was notably enriched in genes related to ribosome biogenesis and the structural components of the ribosome. We confirmed that the expression of ribosome biogenesis mRNAs increases after G1 but decreases following mitosis. Finally, we analyzed the contribution of mRNA stability to each cluster and found that a coordinated regulation of RNAP II activity and mRNA decay is necessary to fully understand the alternative strategies of gene expression across the cell cycle.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2024

Growth rate regulates RNA polymerase II transcription elongation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Cells must adapt to changing environmental conditions to maintain their fitness and to compete with other genotypes during the natural selection process. The growth rate (GR) is a determining factor in this competition, and it influences gene expression. Some genes increase mRNA levels, while others decrease with the GR. mRNA levels depend on the dynamic balance between their synthesis by RNA polymerase II and their degradation rates. RNA polymerase I and III are also influenced by the GR because they transcribe protein synthesis machinery required to make proteins that increase cell mass during growth. Although RNA levels have been extensively studied in relation to the GR in many organisms, synthesis and degradation rates have, however, been much less investigated. In a previous work, we found a positive correlation between RNA polymerase (RNA pol) II transcription and mRNA degradation with GRs in yeast in batch cultures. Here we extend our study under constant growth conditions in a chemostat and find that overall chromatin-associated RNA pol II levels increase in parallel with the GR. This increase appears to involve the accumulation of partially dephosphorylated RNA pol II with a greater tendency to backtracking, which suggests that the GR regulates RNA pol II-dependent transcription at the elongation level. RNA pol I also increases its association with chromatin with the GR, which confirms the general dependence of at least RNA pol I and II transcription on the GR.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2023

The transcription factor Sfp1 imprints specific classes of mRNAs and links their synthesis and cytoplasmic decay

To function effectively as an integrated system, the transcriptional and post-transcriptional machineries must communicate through mechanisms that are still poorly understood. Here we focus on Sfp1, known to regulate transcription of proliferation-related genes. We show that Sfp1 can regulate transcription either by binding to promoters, like most known transcription activators, or by binding to the transcribed regions (gene bodies), probably via RNA polymerase II (Pol II). We further studied the first mode of Sfp1 activity and found that, following promoter binding, Sfp1 binds to gene bodies and affects Pol II configuration, manifested by dissociation or conformational change of its Rpb4 subunit and increased backtracking. Surprisingly, Sfp1 binds to a subset of mRNAs co-transcriptionally and stabilizes them. The interaction between Sfp1 and its client mRNAs is controlled by their respective promoters and coincides with Sfp1s dissociation from chromatin. . Intriguingly, Sfp1 dissociation from the chromatin correlates with the extent of the backtracked Pol II. We propose that, following promoter recruitment, Sfp1 accompanies Pol II and regulates backtracking. The backtracked Pol II is more compatible with Sfp1s relocation to the nascent transcripts, whereupon Sfp1 accompanies these mRNAs to the cytoplasm and regulates their stability. Thus, Sfp1s co-transcriptional binding imprints the mRNA fate, serving as a paradigm for the cross-talk between the synthesis and decay of specific mRNAs. The interplay between Sfp1s two modes of transcription regulation remains to be examined.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2022

Gene regulation by synergism between mRNA decay and gene transcription

It has become increasingly clear in the last few years that gene expression in eukaryotes is not a linear process starting from transcription in the nucleus to the cytoplasm, but a circular one where the mRNA level is controlled by crosstalk between nuclear transcription and cytoplasmic decay pathways. One of the possible purposes of this crosstalk is to keep the mRNA level approximately constant. This is called mRNA buffering and happens when transcription and mRNA degradation act at compensatory rates. However, if transcription and mRNA degradation act synergistically, enhanced gene expression regulation would occur. In this work we mathematically modeled the effects of RNA binding proteins (RBP) when they have positive or negative effects on mRNA synthesis and decay rates. We found that they can buffer or enhance gene expression responses depending on their respective effects on transcription and mRNA stability. Then we analyzed new and previously published genomic datasets obtained for several yeast mutants related to either transcription or mRNA decay, but they are not known to possess activity in the other process. We show that some of them, which were presumed only transcription factors (Sfp1) or only decay factors (Puf3, Upf2/3), may represent examples of RBPs that make specific synergistic crosstalk to enhance the control of the mRNA levels of their target genes by combining antagonistic effects on transcriptional and mRNA stability.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2021

RNA-controlled nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of mRNA decay factors regulates mRNA synthesis and initiates a novel mRNA decay pathway

mRNA level is controlled by factors that mediate both mRNA synthesis and decay, including the exonuclease Xrn1 - a major mRNA synthesis and decay factor. Here we show that nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of Xrn1 and of some of its associated mRNA decay factors plays a key role in determining both mRNA synthesis and decay. Shuttling is regulated by RNA-controlled binding of the karyopherin Kap120 to two nuclear localization sequences (NLSs) in Xrn1. The decaying RNA binds and masks NLS1, establishing a link between mRNA decay and Xrn1 shuttling. Mutations in the two NLSs, which prevent Xrn1 import, compromise transcription and, unexpectedly, also the cytoplasmic decay of [~]50% of the cellular mRNAs - comparably to Xrn1 deletion. These findings uncover a cytoplasmic mRNA decay pathway that begins in the nucleus. Interestingly, Xrn1 shuttling is required for proper adaptation to environmental changes, in particular to ever changing environmental fluctuations.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2021

The total mRNA concentration buffering system in yeast is global rather than gene-specific

Gene expression in eukaryotes does not follow a linear process from transcription to translation and mRNA degradation. Instead it follows a circular process in which cytoplasmic mRNA decay crosstalks with nuclear transcription. In many instances this crosstalk contributes to buffer mRNA at a roughly constant concentration. Whether the mRNA buffering concept operates on the total mRNA concentration or at the gene-specific level, and if the mechanism to do so is a global or a specific one, remain unknown. Here we assessed changes in mRNA concentrations and their synthesis rates along the transcriptome of aneuploid strains of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We also assessed mRNA concentrations and their synthesis rates in non sense-mediated decay (NMD) targets in euploid strains. We found that the altered synthesis rates in the genes from the aneuploid chromosome and the changes in their mRNA stabilities were not counterbalanced. In addition, the stability of NMD targets was not specifically compensated by the changes in synthesis rate. We conclude that there is no genetic compensation of NMD mRNA targets in yeast, and total mRNA buffering uses mostly a global system rather than a gene-specific one.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2020

A trans-omics comparison reveals common gene expression strategies in four model organisms and exposes similarities and differences between them

The ultimate goal of gene regulation should focus on the protein level. However, as mRNA is an obligate intermediary, and because the amounts of mRNAs and proteins are controlled by their synthesis and degradation rates, the cellular amount of a given protein can be attained following different strategies. By studying omics datasets for six expression variables (mRNA and protein amounts, plus their synthesis and decay rates), we previously demonstrated the existence of common expression strategies (CES) for functionally-related genes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here we extend that study to two other eukaryotes: the distantly related yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe and cultured human HeLa cells. We also use genomic datasets from the model prokaryote Escherichia coli as an external reference. We show that CES are also present in all the studied organisms and the differences in them between organisms can be used to establish their phylogenetic relationships. The phenogram based on 6VP has the expected topology for the phylogeny of these four organisms, but shows interesting branch length differences to DNA sequence-based trees. The analysis of the correlations among the six variables supports that most gene expression control occurs in actively growing organisms at the transcription rate level, and that translation plays a minor role in it. We propose that all living cells use CES for the genes acting on the same physiological pathways, especially for those belonging to stable macromolecular complexes, but CES have been modeled by evolution to adapt to the specific life circumstances of each organism. The obtained phenograms may reflect both evolutionary constraints in expression strategies, and lifestyle convergences.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2020

Rpb4 and Puf3 imprint and post-transcriptionally control the stability of a common set of mRNAs in yeast

Gene expression involving RNA polymerase II is regulated by the concerted interplay between mRNA synthesis and degradation, crosstalk in which mRNA decay machinery and transcription machinery respectively impact transcription and mRNA stability. Rpb4, and likely dimer Rpb4/7, seem the central components of the RNA pol II governing these processes. In this work we unravel the molecular mechanisms participated by Rpb4 that mediate the posttranscriptional events regulating mRNA imprinting and stability. By RIP-Seq, we analyzed genome-wide the association of Rpb4 with mRNAs and demonstrated that it targeted a large population of more than 1400 transcripts. A group of these mRNAs was also the target of the RNA binding protein, Puf3. We demonstrated that Rpb4 and Puf3 physically, genetically, and functionally interact and also affect mRNA stability, and likely the imprinting, of a common group of mRNAs. Furthermore, the Rpb4 and Puf3 association with mRNAs depends on one another. We also demonstrated, for the first time, that Puf3 associates with chromatin in an Rpb4-dependent manner. Our data also suggest that Rpb4 could be a key element of the RNA pol II that coordinates mRNA synthesis, imprinting and stability in cooperation with RBPs.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2020

Xrn1 influences RNA pol II-dependent transcription elongation rates across the yeast genome and this control is particularly relevant for late elongation of regulatory genes

mRNA homeostasis is favored by crosstalk between transcription and degradation machineries. Both the Ccr4-Not and the Xrn1-decaysome complexes have been described to influence transcription. While Ccr4-Not has been shown to directly stimulate transcription elongation, the information available on how Xrn1 influences transcription is scarce and contradictory. In this study we have addressed this issue by mapping RNA polymerase II (RNA pol II) at high resolution, using CRAC and BioGRO-seq techniques in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We found significant effects of Xrn1 perturbation on RNA pol II profiles across the genome. RNA pol II profiles at 5 exhibited significant alterations that were compatible with decreased elongation rates in the absence of Xrn1. Nucleosome mapping detected altered chromatin configuration in the gene bodies. We also detected accumulation of RNA pol II shortly upstream of polyadenylation sites by CRAC, although not by BioGRO-seq, suggesting higher frequency of backtracking before pre-mRNA cleavage. This phenomenon was particularly linked to genes with poorly positioned nucleosomes at this position. Accumulation of RNA pol II at 3 was also detected in other mRNA decay mutants. According to these and other pieces of evidence, Xrn1 seems to influence transcription elongation at least in two ways: by directly favoring elongation rates and by a more general mechanism that connects mRNA decay to late elongation.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2019

Cell volume homeostatically controls the rDNA repeat copy number and rRNA synthesis rate in yeast

The adjustment of transcription and translation rates to variable needs is of utmost importance for the fitness and survival of living cells. We have previously shown that the global transcription rate for RNA polymerase II is regulated differently in cells presenting symmetrical or asymmetrical cell division. The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae adopts a particular strategy to avoid that the smaller daughter cells increase their total mRNA concentration with every generation. The global mRNA synthesis rate lowers with a growing cell volume, but global mRNA stability increases. In this paper, we address what the solution is to the same theoretical problem for the RNA polymerase I synthesis rate. We find that the RNA polymerase I synthesis rate strictly depends on the copy number of its 35S rRNA gene. For cells with larger cell sizes, such as a mutant cln3 strain, the rDNA repeat copy number is increased by a mechanism based on a feed-back mechanism in which Sir2 histone deacetylase homeostatically controls the amplification of the rRNA genes at the rDNA locus in a volume-dependent manner.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2019

Homeostasis in the Central Dogma of Molecular Biology

Cell survival requires the control of biomolecule concentration, i.e. biomolecules should approach homeostasis. With information-carrying macromolecules, the particular concentration variation ranges depend on each type: DNA is not buffered, but mRNA and protein concentrations are homeostatically controlled, which leads to the ribostasis and proteostasis concepts. In recent years, we have studied the particular features of mRNA ribostasis and proteostasis in the model organism S. cerevisiae. Here we extend this study by comparing published data from three other model organisms: E. coli, S. pombe and cultured human cells. We describe how mRNA ribostasis is less strict than proteostasis. A constant ratio appears between the average decay and dilution rates during cell growth for mRNA, but not for proteins. We postulate that this is due to a trade-off between the cost of synthesis and the response capacity. This compromise takes place at the transcription level, but is not possible at the translation level as the high stability of proteins, versus that of mRNAs, precludes it. We hypothesize that the middle-place role of mRNA in the Central Dogma of Molecular Biology and its chemical instability make it more suitable than proteins for the fast changes needed for gene regulation.\n\nO_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=147 SRC=\"FIGDIR/small/599050v2_ufig1.gif\" ALT=\"Figure 1\">\nView larger version (24K):\norg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@95419aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@10612e5org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c29081org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@9d21c0_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG Graphical Abstract C_FIG

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2018

The telomeric Cdc13-Stn1-Ten1 complex regulates RNA polymerase II transcription

Specialized telomeric proteins have an essential role in maintaining genome stability through chromosome end protection and telomere length regulation. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the evolutionary conserved CST complex, composed of the Cdc13, Stn1 and Ten1 proteins, largely contributes to these functions. Here, we report the existence of genetic interactions between TEN1 and several genes coding for transcription regulators. Molecular assays confirmed this novel function of Ten1 and further established that it regulates the occupancies of RNA polymerase II and the Spt5 elongation factor within transcribed genes. Since Ten1, but also Cdc13 and Stn1, were found to physically associate with Spt5, we propose that Spt5 represents the target of CST in transcription regulation. Moreover, CST physically associates with Hmo1, previously shown to mediate the architecture of S phase-transcribed genes. The fact that, genome-wide, the promoters of genes down-regulated in the ten1-31 mutant are prefentially bound by Hmo1, leads us to propose a potential role for CST in synchronizing transcription with replication fork progression following head-on collisions.

molecular biology↗