Peiffer-Smadja, N. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2026

Integration of immunomonitoring assays with PET/CT in TB patients identifies on-treatment biomarkers

Tuberculosis (TB) continues to pose a significant global public health challenge with substantial patient morbidity and mortality. Current TB patient biomarkers lack sufficient resolution to inform treatment response and patient stratification. This necessitates the development of sensitive and reliable host biomarkers. We previously demonstrated the efficacy of TruCulture whole blood stimulation for differentiating asymptomatic TB from active pulmonary TB disease patients in endemic regions. Our systems immunology study expands upon this previous work by evaluating the potential of TruCulture to monitor longitudinal responses to TB treatment in patients from the Predict-TB trial before, during, and after 6 months of antibiotic therapy. We stimulated whole blood from TB patients (n=40) using TruCulture under four conditions (Null, Mycobacterium tuberculosis-antigen, LPS, and IL-1{beta}) at baseline (week 0), during treatment (weeks 16 and 24), and one-year follow-up post- treatment (week 72). 20/25 measured cytokines exhibited significant changes throughout treatment, with several continuing to evolve during post-therapy follow-up. Machine learning based analysis identified Mtb-Ag-induced IL-1RA (AUC = 0.90, 0.92, 0.95 at weeks 16, 24, 72) and LPS-induced NLRP3 (AUC = 0.94 at week 16) as the best protein and transcriptional biomarkers for distinguishing treated from untreated patients, strongly implicating the inflammasome response. Combining these results with the extent of lung disease assessed by FDG PET/CT scans, we showed direct disease relevance for these blood-based biomarkers. The identified biomarker profiles hold promise for improving TB patient care through early prediction of treatment responses, real-time therapy monitoring, and informed development of host-directed therapeutic strategies for clinical decision-making. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=146 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/723467v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (45K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@15ae804org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@136939forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@15ac58org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e5d8f0_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOGraphical abstractC_FLOATNO Predict-TB clinical study overview and summary of TB-specific biomarkers identified from TruCulture whole blood stimulation system. C_FIG

immunology↗

bioRxiv2020

Open Science Saves Lives: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic

In the last decade Open Science principles have been successfully advocated for and are being slowly adopted in different research communities. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic many publishers and researchers have sped up their adoption of Open Science practices, sometimes embracing them fully and sometimes partially or in a sub-optimal manner. In this article, we express concerns about the violation of some of the Open Science principles and its potential impact on the quality of research output. We provide evidence of the misuses of these principles at different stages of the scientific process. We call for a wider adoption of Open Science practices in the hope that this work will encourage a broader endorsement of Open Science principles and serve as a reminder that science should always be a rigorous process, reliable and transparent, especially in the context of a pandemic where research findings are being translated into practice even more rapidly. We provide all data and scripts at https://osf.io/renxy/.

scientific communication and education↗