Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Peeters, L.

Publications and source records attributed to Peeters, L..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Machine Learning Analysis of Motor Evoked Potential Time Series to Predict Disability Progression in Multiple Sclerosis

BackgroundEvoked potentials (EPs) are a measure of the conductivity of the central nervous system. They are used to monitor disease progression of multiple sclerosis patients. Previous studies only extracted a few variables from the EPs, which are often further condensed into a single variable: the EP score. We perform a machine learning analysis of motor EP that uses the whole time series, instead of a few variables, to predict disability progression after two years. Obtaining realistic performance estimates of this task has been difficult because of small data set sizes. We recently extracted a dataset of EPs from the Rehabiliation & MS Center in Overpelt, Belgium. Our data set is large enough to obtain, for the first time, a performance estimate on an independent test set containing different patients.\n\nMethodsWe extracted a large number of time series features from the motor EPs with the highly comparative time series analysis software package. Mutual information with the target and the Boruta method are used to find features which contain information not included in the features studied in the literature. We use random forests (RF) and logistic regression (LR) classifiers to predict disability progression after two years. Statistical significance of the performance increase when adding extra features is checked with the DeLong hypothesis test.\n\nResultsIncluding extra time series features in motor EPs leads to a statistically significant improvement compared to using only the known features, although the effect is limited in magnitude ({triangleup}AUC = 0.02 for RF and {triangleup}AUC = 0.05 for LR). RF with extra time series features obtains the best performance (AUC = 0.75 {+/-} 0.07), which is good considering the limited number of biomarkers in the model. RF (a nonlinear classifier) outperforms LR (a linear classifier).\n\nConclusionsUsing machine learning methods on EPs shows promising predictive performance. Using additional EP time series features beyond those already in use leads to a modest increase in performance. Larger datasets, preferably multi-center, are needed for further research. Given a large enough dataset, these models may be used to support clinicians in their decision making process regarding future treatment.

immunology↗

Using expert driven machine learning to enhance dynamic metabolomics data analysis.

Data analysis for metabolomics is undergoing rapid progress thanks to the proliferation of novel tools and the standardization of existing workflows. However, as datasets and experiments continue to increase in size and complexity, standardized workflows are often not sufficient. In addition, as the ground truth for metabolomics experiments is intrinsically unknown, there is no way to critically evaluate the performance of tools. Here, we investigate the problem of dynamic multi-class metabolomics experiments using a simulated dataset with a known ground truth and evaluate the performance of tinderesting, a new and intuitive tool based on gathering expert knowledge to be used in machine learning, and compare it to EDGE, a statistical method for sequence data. This paper presents three novel outcomes. First we present a way to simulate dynamic metabolomics data with a known ground truth based on ordinary differential equations. This method is made available through the MetaboLouise R package. Second, we show that the EDGE tool, originally developed for genomics data analysis, is highly performant in analyzing dynamic case vs control metabolomics data. Last, we introduce the tinderesting method to analyse more complex dynamic metabolomics experiments that performs on par with statistical methods. This tool consists of a Shiny app for collecting expert knowledge, which in turn is used to train a machine learning model to emulate the decision process of the expert. This approach does not replace traditional data analysis workflows for metabolomics, but can provide additional information, improved performance or easier interpretation of results. The advantage is that the tool is agnostic to the complexity of the experiment, and thus is easier to use in advanced setups. All code for the presented analysis, MetaboLouise and tinderesting are freely available.

bioinformatics↗