Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Pedersen, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Pedersen, J..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

SNV and indel error modeling of deep targeted cell-free DNA sequencing data for sensitive detection of circulating tumor DNA in colorectal cancer

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising biomarker for cancer detection, but low tumor burden makes it difficult to distinguish true signal from background noise. To aggregate and better evaluate weak mutational signals, we propose PyDREAMS, which incorporates both single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and insertion and deletions (indels) for ctDNA detection and quantification. To distinguish signal from noise, a neural network background error model is learned from healthy controls. It captures the joint effects of cell-free DNA (cfDNA)-specific lesions and sequencing errors, accounting for both genomic context and read-level features. Finally, a statistical test is used to evaluate the presence of mutational signals. We evaluate the method in a tumor-informed setting, using cohorts of colorectal cancer samples with deep targeted plasma cfDNA sequencing across 12 cancer driver genes. We trained PyDREAMS on 46 healthy controls, with feature analysis revealing that both SNV and indel error rates were lowest at mononucleosomal fragment lengths, suggesting that nucleosomes protect cfDNA and reduce lesion accumulation during circulation and sample handling. In the validation cohort, combining SNVs with indels improved detection, with indels contributing approximately 1.5-fold more evidence per mutation than SNVs. On a test cohort of 209 stage I-III colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and 24 healthy controls, PyDREAMS outperformed a Shearwater-based caller (AUC 0.917 vs 0.909). In stage III post-operative (post-OP) samples (n = 26), where ctDNA was expected only in non-cured patients, PyDREAMS detected ctDNA in 5 patients, including 3/9 with later recurrence, while Shearwater detected none. Together, these results show that PyDREAMS improves evaluation of ultra-low-frequency tumor signals through unified read-level modelling of SNV and indel background error.

bioinformatics↗

Evaluation of Commercially Available Glucagon Receptor Antibodies and Glucagon Receptor Expression

Glucagon is a key regulator of numerous metabolic functions including glucose, protein and lipid metabolism, and glucagon-based therapies are explored for diabetes, fatty liver disease and obesity. Insight into tissue and cell specific expression of the glucagon receptor (GCGR) is important to understand the biology of glucagon as well as to differentiate between direct and indirect actions of glucagon. However, it has been challenging to accurately localize the GCGR in tissue due to low expression levels and lack of specific methodologies. Immunohistochemistry has frequently been used for GCGR localization, but G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) targeting antibodies are notoriously unreliable. In this study, we systematically evaluated all commercially available GCGR antibodies. Initially, twelve GCGR antibodies were evaluated using HEK293 cells transfected with mouse or human GCGR cDNA. Of the twelve antibodies tested, eleven showed positive staining of GCGR protein from both species. Human liver tissue was investigated using the same GCGR antibodies. Five antibodies failed to stain human liver biopsies (despite explicit claims to the contrary from the vendors). Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining demonstrated positive staining of liver tissue from glucagon receptor knockout (Gcgr-/-) mice and their wild-type littermates (Gcgr+/+) with only one out of the twelve available GCGR antibodies. Three antibodies were selected for further evaluation by western blotting and bands corresponding to the predicted size of the GCGR (62 kDa) were identified using two of these. Finally, a single antibody (no. 11) was selected for specific GCGR localization studies in various tissues. In mouse tissue the most intense immunostainings were found in lever, kidney, ileum, heart, and pancreas. Western blotting, performed on liver tissue from Gcgr+/+ and Gcgr-/- mice, confirmed the specificity of antibody no. 11, detecting a band at high intensity in material from Gcgr+/+and no bands in liver tissue from Gcgr-/-mice. Staining of human kidney tissue, with antibody no. 11, showed GCGR localization to the distal tubules. Autoradiography was used as an antibody-independent approach to support the antibody-based findings, revealing specific binding in liver, pancreas, and kidney. As a final approach, RNA-sequencing and single-cell RNA (scRNA)-sequencing were implemented. RNA-sequencing confirmed GCGR presence within liver and kidney tissue. The GCGR was specifically found to be expressed in hepatocytes by scRNA-sequencing and potentially also in collecting and distal tubule cells in the kidney. Our results clearly indicate the liver and the kidneys as the primary targets of glucagon action.

physiology↗

Alanine, arginine, and proline but not glutamine are the feed-back regulators in the liver-alpha cell axis in mice

AimTo identify the amino acids that stimulate glucagon secretion in mice and whether the metabolism of these relies on glucagon receptor signaling.\n\nMethodsPancreata of female C57BL/6JRj mice were perfused with 19 individual amino acids (1 mM) and secretion of glucagon was assessed using a specific glucagon radioimmunoassay. Separately, a glucagon receptor antagonist (GRA; 25-2648, 100 mg/kg) or vehicle was administered to female C57BL/6JRj mice three hours prior to an intraperitoneal injection of four different isomolar (in total 7 {micro}mol/g body weight) amino acid mixtures; mixture 1: alanine, arginine, cysteine, and proline; mixture 2: asparatate, glutamate, histidine, and lysine; mixture 3: citrulline, methionine, serine, and threonine; and mixture 4: glutamine, leucine, isoleucine, and valine. Blood glucose, plasma glucagon, amino acid, and insulin concentrations were measured using well characterized methodologies.\n\nResultsAlanine (P=0.03), arginine (P<0.001), and proline (P=0.03) but not glutamine (P=0.2) stimulated glucagon secretion from the perfused mouse pancreas. Cysteine had the numerically largest effect on glucagon secretion but did not reach statistical significance (P=0.08). However, when the four isomolar amino acid mixtures were administered there were no significant difference (P>0.5) in plasma concentrations of glucagon across mixture 1-4. Plasma concentrations of total amino acids were higher after administration of GRA when mixture 1 (P=0.004) or mixture 3 (P=0.04) were injected.\n\nConclusionOur data suggest that alanine, arginine, and proline but not glutamine are involved in the liver-alpha cell axis in mice as they all increased glucagon secretion and their disappearance rate was altered by GRA.\n\nGraphical abstract\n\nO_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=110 SRC=\"FIGDIR/small/792119v2_ufig1.gif\" ALT=\"Figure 1\">\nView larger version (19K):\norg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@b78a3corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d475d1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1830a00org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@59c51_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

physiology↗