Biology subjects

Pearson, J. V.

Publications and source records attributed to Pearson, J. V..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Genomic alterations enable BRCA1 methylation loss and promoter bypass to drive resistance in high-grade serous ovarian cancer

BRCA1 promoter methylation predicts sensitivity to PARP inhibitors in high-grade serous ovarian cancer, yet therapeutic resistance is common and mechanistically unresolved. Using long-read direct DNA sequencing of patient-derived xenografts and cell lines, we resolved BRCA1 methylation at single-molecule resolution with structural and transcriptomic analyses. We revealed two convergent PARP inhibitor and platinum resistance mechanisms, validated in patient tumors. First, focal, allele-specific loss of BRCA1 methylation arose through local cis-acting genomic alterations, instead of global epigenetic reprogramming. Engineered in cis sequence alterations near the methylated BRCA1 promoter were sufficient to induce methylation loss, restore homologous recombination, and confer resistance. Similar associations were observed across the genome, suggesting this mechanism extends beyond BRCA1. Second, BRCA1 expression was restored despite intact promoter methylation via structural variant-mediated promoter bypass or alternative transcription initiation. Together, these findings redefine BRCA1 methylation loss as a locus-restricted process and reveal multiple routes by which tumors escape PARP inhibitor therapy. Statement of SignificanceWe show that high-grade serous ovarian cancers can restore BRCA1 expression after therapy through multiple genomic mechanisms, including local methylation loss and promoter bypass, thereby re-establishing homologous recombination and driving PARP inhibitor resistance. These findings challenge reliance on BRCA1 methylation alone as a predictive biomarker and support rational combination therapies for more durable responses.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2025

Explainable machine learning identifies features and thresholds predictive of immunotherapy response

BackgroundImmunotherapy has improved patient survival for multiple cancer types, including melanoma. While a variety of molecular features have been linked to response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) treatment, clinically established biomarkers, such as tumour mutation burden (TMB) and PD-L1 expression, have shown limitations in accurately categorising responders versus non-responders. Due to the complex nature of ICI response, which includes cancer intrinsic and extrinsic features within the tumour microenvironment (TME), using a single biomarker to predict response is insufficient, necessitating the need to identify accurate clinical and multi-omic molecular predictors. MethodsWe integrate clinical, DNA and RNA sequencing data from four datasets, comprising 138 melanoma patients treated with ICI, to develop machine learning models for predicting ICI response. The performance of each model was evaluated using an independent dataset of patients with cutaneous melanoma (n=53). Interactions between trained models and features were rationalised using the explainability method SHAP. ResultsThe most optimal model was the multi-omic random forest model, with AUC-ROC of 0.78 when predicting response in the independent test dataset. Using SHAP, we predicted thresholds for mutational signatures, neoantigen load, immune cell-type abundance and immune receptor LAG3 expression. The relationship between these influential features and their SHAP scores revealed numerical thresholds constituting good and poor patient response. ConclusionsThis approach highlights patient response to ICI is influenced by both cancer intrinsic and extrinsic features, as well as identifies candidate biomarkers that could inform the use of ICI and potentially assist in the selection of combination therapy in melanoma treatment.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2021

Genomic analysis of patient-derived xenograft models reveals intra-tumor heterogeneity in endometrial cancer and can predict tumor growth inhibition with talazoparib

BackgroundEndometrial cancer (EC) is a major gynecological cancer with increasing incidence. It comprised of four molecular subtypes with differing etiology, prognoses, and response to chemotherapy. In the future, clinical trials testing new single agents or combination therapies will be targeted to the molecular subtype most likely to respond. Pre-clinical models that faithfully represent the molecular subtypes of EC are urgently needed, we sought to develop and characterize a panel of novel EC patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. MethodsHere, we report whole exome or whole genome sequencing of 11 PDX models and the matched primary tumor. Analysis of multiple PDX lineages and passages was performed to study tumor heterogeneity across lineages and/or passages. Based on recent reports of frequent defects in the homologous recombination (HR) pathway in EC, we assessed mutational signatures and HR deficiency scores and correlated these with in vivo responses to the PARP inhibitor (PARPi) talazoparib in six PDXs representing the different molecular subtypes of EC. ResultsPDX models were successfully generated from all four molecular subtypes of EC and uterine carcinosarcomas, and they recapitulated morphology and the molecular landscape of primary tumors without major genomic drift. We also observed a wide range of inter-tumor and intra-tumor heterogeneity, well captured by different PDX lineages, which could lead to different treatment responses. An in vivo response to talazoparib was detected in two p53mut models consistent with stable disease, however both lacked the HR deficiency genomic signature. ConclusionsEC PDX models represent the four molecular subtypes of disease and can capture intra-tumoral heterogeneity of the original primary tumor. PDXs of the p53mut molecular subtype showed sensitivity to PARPi, however, deeper and more durable responses will likely require combination of PARPi with other agents.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2020

Anatomic position determines oncogenic specificity in melanoma

Oncogenic alterations to DNA are not transforming in all cellular contexts1,2. This may be due to pre-existing transcriptional programs in the cell of origin. Here, we define anatomic position as a major determinant of why cells respond to specific oncogenes. Cutaneous melanoma arises throughout the body, whereas the acral subtype arises on the palms of the hands, soles of the feet, or under the nails3. We sequenced the DNA of cutaneous and acral melanomas from a large cohort of human patients and found a specific enrichment for BRAF mutations in cutaneous melanoma but CRKL amplifications in acral melanoma. We modeled these changes in transgenic zebrafish models and found that CRKL-driven tumors predominantly formed in the fins of the fish. The fins are the evolutionary precursors to tetrapod limbs, indicating that melanocytes in these acral locations may be uniquely susceptible to CRKL. RNA profiling of these fin/limb melanocytes, compared to body melanocytes, revealed a positional identity gene program typified by posterior HOX13 genes. This positional gene program synergized with CRKL to drive tumors at acral sites. Abrogation of this CRKL-driven program eliminated the anatomic specificity of acral melanoma. These data suggest that the anatomic position of the cell of origin endows it with a unique transcriptional state that makes it susceptible to only certain oncogenic insults.

cancer biology↗