Patterson, J. S. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2022

Using predictive validity to compare associations between brain damage and behavior

Lesion-behavior mapping (LBM) provides a statistical map of the association between voxel-wise brain damage and individual differences in behavior. To understand whether two behaviors are mediated by damage to distinct regions, researchers often compare LBM weight outputs by either the Overlap method or the Correlation method. However, these methods lack statistical criteria to determine whether two LBM are distinct vs. the same and are disconnected from a major goal of LBMs: predicting behavior from brain damage. Without such criteria, researchers may draw conclusions from numeric differences between LBMs that are irrelevant to predicting behavior. We developed and validated a Predictive Validity Comparison method (PVC) that establishes a statistical criterion for comparing two LBMs using predictive accuracy: two LBMs are distinct if and only if they provide unique predictive power for the behaviors being assessed. We applied PVC to two lesion-behavior stroke data sets, demonstrating its utility for determining when behaviors arise from the same vs. different lesion patterns. Using region-of-interest based simulations derived from proportion damage from a large data set (n = 131), PVC accurately detected when behaviors were mediated by different regions (high sensitivity) vs. the same region (high specificity). Both the Overlap method and Correlation method performed poorly on the simulated data. By objectively determining whether two behavioral deficits can be explained by a single vs. distinct patterns of brain damage, PVC provides a critical advance in establishing the brain bases of behavior. We have developed and released a GUI-driven web app to encourage widespread adoption.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

Under pressure: phenotypic divergence and convergence associated with microhabitat adaptations in Triatominae

BackgroundTriatomine bugs, the vectors of Chagas disease, associate with vertebrate hosts in highly diverse ecotopes. When these blood-sucking bugs adapt to new microhabitats, their phenotypes may change. Although understanding phenotypic variation is key to the study of adaptive evolution and central to phenotype-based taxonomy, the drivers of phenotypic change and diversity in triatomines remain poorly understood. Methods/FindingsWe combined a detailed phenotypic appraisal (including morphology and morphometrics) with mitochondrial cytb and nuclear ITS2 DNA-sequence analyses to study Rhodnius ecuadoriensis populations from across the species range. We found three major, naked-eye phenotypic variants. Southern-Andean bugs (SW Ecuador/NW Peru) from house and vertebrate-nest microhabitats are typical, light-colored, small bugs with short heads/wings. Northern-Andean bugs (W Ecuador wet-forest palms) are dark, large bugs with long heads/wings. Finally, northern-lowland bugs (coastal Ecuador dry-forest palms) are light-colored and medium-sized. Wing and (size-free) head shapes are similar across Ecuadorian populations, regardless of habitat or naked-eye phenotype, but distinct in Peruvian bugs. Bayesian phylogenetic and multispecies-coalescent DNA-sequence analyses strongly suggest that Ecuadorian and Peruvian populations are two independently-evolving lineages, with little within-lineage structuring/differentiation. ConclusionsWe report sharp naked-eye phenotypic divergence of genetically similar Ecuadorian R. ecuadoriensis (house/nest southern-Andean vs. palm-dwelling northern bugs; and palm-dwelling Andean vs. lowland); and sharp naked-eye phenotypic similarity of typical, yet genetically distinct, southern-Andean bugs from house and nest (but not palm) microhabitats (SW Ecuador vs. NW Peru). This remarkable phenotypic diversity within a single nominal species likely stems from microhabitat adaptations possibly involving predator-driven selective pressure (yielding substrate-matching camouflage coloration) and a shift from palm-crown to vertebrate-nest microhabitats (yielding smaller bodies and shorter heads and wings). These findings shed new light on the origins of phenotypic diversity in triatomines, warn against excess reliance on phenotype-based triatomine-bug taxonomy, and confirm the Triatominae as an informative model-system for the study of phenotypic change under ecological pressure. Author summaryTriatomine bugs feed on the blood of vertebrates including humans and transmit the parasite that causes Chagas disease. The bugs, of which 150+ species are known, are highly diverse in size, shape, and color. Some species look so similar that they are commonly confused, whereas a few same-species populations look so different that they were thought to be separate species. Despite the crucial role of naked-eye phenotypes in triatomine-bug identification and classification (which are essential for vector control-surveillance), the origins of this variation remain unclear. Here, we describe a striking case of phenotypic divergence, with genetically similar bugs looking very different from one another, and phenotypic convergence, with bugs from two genetically distinct populations (likely on their way to speciation) looking very similar - and all within a single nominal species, Rhodnius ecuadoriensis. Phenotypically divergent populations occupy different ecological regions (wet vs. dry) and microhabitats (palm-crowns vs. vertebrate nests), whereas convergent populations occupy man-made and nest (but not palm) microhabitats. These findings suggest that triatomines can respond to ecological novelty by changing their external, naked-eye phenotypes as they adapt to new microhabitats. We therefore warn that phenotypic traits such as overall size or color may confound triatomine-bug species identification and classification.

evolutionary biology↗