Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Papaj, D. R.

Publications and source records attributed to Papaj, D. R..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Floral Cues and Flower Handling Tactics Affect Switching Decisions by Nectar-Foraging Bumble Bees

Nectar foraging bees change their use of floral resources as plant species appear in the environment and disappear over their lifetimes. The new flowers used may involve different cues and different nectar extraction tactics. Although bumble bees can adapt to changes in floral cues and required tactics, little is known about whether bees prioritize switching tactics or floral cues when deciding which plant species to switch to. In a laboratory assay, we forced Bombus impatiens (common eastern bumble bee) workers either to switch the handling tactic they were using or to continue using the tactic but to switch the colour of artificial flowers foraged on. We examined whether bees tendency to change their tactics was influenced by how similar in colour novel flowers were to familiar ones. We conducted a 2 x 2 factorial experiment using artificial flowers, manipulating the handling tactic that bees were initially trained (legitimate visitation or nectar robbing) and the similarity between novel and trained colours (similar or distinct). We found that under most conditions bees preferred to switch flower colours and retain handling tactics. However, when given experience with legitimate visitation and when novel flowers were markedly different in colour from those they had experienced previously, bees tended to switch tactic while continuing to forage on flowers of the same colour. These findings suggest that the similarity in colour of a new floral resource to the currently exploited resource, along with the flower handling tactic employed by bees, jointly plays an important role in decision-making by foraging bumble bees.

animal behavior and cognition↗

The Role of Similarity of Stimuli and Responses in Learning by Nectar-Foraging Bumble Bees: A Test of Osgood's Model

Learning stimulus - response associations helps animals to adjust to changing environments. Sequentially learned associations may interact with each other, either reinforcing memory, a process referred to as transfer, or hindering memory, a process referred to as interference. According to Osgoods (1949) model, close similarity between new and previously learned stimuli can enhance the transfer of memory through a process of stimulus generalization. In contrast, the model proposes that if responses are different from those previously learned, generalizing stimuli may lead to confusion, resulting in the interference of memory. Except for some work in humans, the interaction between stimulus similarity and response similarity is poorly documented. Here, we tested Osgoods model using bumble bees (Bombus impatiens) foraging for sucrose on artificial flowers with varied colours (= stimuli) that required either legitimate visitation or nectar robbing (= responses). Bees were first allowed to forage on one type of flower, were then switched to another, and finally were returned to the initial flower type. We measured learning performance via flower handling time and the number of failed visits. Consistent with Osgoods model, bees made more failed visits when they switched between similarly coloured flowers requiring different foraging techniques but made fewer failed visits when switching between similarly coloured flowers with the same technique. Regardless of similarities in stimuli or responses, however, experienced bees were faster in handling flowers than were naive bees. Results taken together thus provided mixed support for Osgoods model. Possible explanations for the mixed results are discussed.

animal behavior and cognition↗

The Relationship Between Preference and Switching in Flower Foraging by Bees

It seems self-evident that generalist foragers switch more between resources than specialists but despite diverse ecological and evolutionary implications, how variation in switching relates to variation in preference warrants additional study. Here we tested predictions based on a simple probability model, using flower-foraging bees as a model system. In laboratory assays, we presented bumble bee (Bombus impatiens) workers with flowers of two species, Tecoma stans and T. alata, from which they could collect nectar and/or pollen. We quantified landing preference and occurrence of switching between species in successive visits. Bees varied greatly in floral preference. Almost half showed statistically significant preferences for one or the other species, while the rest were generalists. As expected, generalists using both flower species switched more in successive visits than bees that were more specialized, a pattern fit to a quadratic function. However, generalist individuals switched more than expected based on null expectation. A Modified Jacobs Index (MJI) of switching was significantly positively correlated with degree of preference: generalist bees had more negative MJIs than specialist bees, indicating that even after the expected statistical effect of preference on switching was accounted for, they switched more than specialists. A simulation ruled out the possibility that the pattern was due to bias in MJI. Generalist-specialist differences in which food was collected (nectar versus pollen) were also ruled out. We discuss possible explanations for our observed pattern and outline possible ways in which preference and switching frequency will interact to shape pollinator behavior and the floral resource. Significance statementBehavioral preference is the subject of a large literature in areas such as foraging, mating and communication. However, a preference measure alone does not necessarily tell us if choices for one alternative are made in runs or intermingled with choices for another alternative. The distinction between preference and the sequential pattern of choices is relevant in many contexts in behavioral ecology but has been a particular focus of study in flower foraging by pollinators. Even in that literature, the relationship between preference and sequential pattern in switching warrants further examination. In our study, bees were shown to vary in preference for flowers of two species. Some were generalists; some were specialists on one or the other species. Generalist bees switched more than specialist bees, even after controlling for statistical effects of preference on switching frequency. The report of this generalist-specialist pattern in switching may be novel and has far-reaching implications throughout the field of behavioral ecology.

animal behavior and cognition↗