Biology subjects

Panesar, S. S.

Publications and source records attributed to Panesar, S. S..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2018

Structure, Asymmetry and Segmentation of the Human Parietal Aslant and Vertical Occipital Fasciculi

We previously proposed a bipartite 'dorsal-ventral' model of human arcuate fasciculus (AF) morphology. This model does not, however, account for the 'vertical,' temporoparietal subdivision of the AF described in earlier dissection and tractographic studies. In an effort to address the absence of the vertical AF (VAF) within the 'dorsal-ventral' model, we conducted a dedicated tractographic and white-matter dissection study of this tract and another short, vertical, posterior-hemispheric fascicle: the vertical occipital fasciculus (VOF). We conducted atlas-based, non-tensor, deterministic tractography in 30 single subjects from the Human Connectome Project database and verified our results using an average diffusion atlas comprising 842 separate normal subjects. We also performed white-matter dissection in 4 cadaveric hemispheres. Our tractographic results demonstrate that the VAF is in fact a bipartite system connecting the ventral-parietal and ventral-temporal regions, with variable connective and no volumetric lateralization. The VOF is a non-lateralized, non-segmented system connecting lateral occipital areas with basal-temporal regions. Importantly, the VOF was distinctly dissociated from the VAF. As the VAF demonstrates no overall connective or volumetric lateralization, we postulate its distinction from the AF system and propose its re-naming to the 'parietal aslant tract,' (PAT) with unique dorsal and ventral subdivisions. Our tractography results were supported by diffusion atlas and white matter dissection findings.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

Feasibility of clinician-facilitated 3D printing of synthetic cranioplasty flaps

Objectives3D scanning and stereolithographic printing technology becoming increasingly common, however its implementation into clinical practice is in its primacy. These technologies may be esoteric to the practicing neurosurgeon. We explored a range of 3D scanning and stereolithographic techniques to create patient-specific synthetic implants.\n\nMethodsWe simulated bilateral craniectomies from a single cadaveric specimen to create 3 methods of creating stereolithographically-viable virtual models. Firstly, we used pre-and-post operative CT derived bony windows to create a virtual skull model, from which the flap was extracted. Secondly, we used an entry-level 3D light-scanner to scan and render models of the individual bone pieces. Thirdly, we used an arm-mounted, 3D laser-scanner to create virtual models using a real-time approach.\n\nResultsFlaps were printed from the CT scanner and laser scanner models only, in a UV-cured polymer. The light scanner did not produce suitable virtual models for printing. The CT scanner derived models required extensive post-fabrication modification to fit the existing defects. The laser-scanner models assumed good fit within the defects without any modification.\n\nConclusionsThe methods presented varying levels of complexity in acquisition and model rendering. Each technique required hardware at varying in price points from $0 to [~]$100,000. The laser-scanner models produced the best quality parts which bore near-perfect fit with the original defects. We discuss potential neurosurgical applications of this technology.

synthetic biology↗