Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Palomares, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Palomares, S..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Proteomics and phosphoproteomics profiling of the co-formulation of type I and II interferons, HeberFERON, in the glioblastoma-derived cell line U-87 MG

HeberFERON is a co-formulation of Interferon (IFN)-2b and IFN-{gamma} in synergic proportions, with a demonstrated effect on skin cancer and other solid tumors. It has antiproliferative effects over glioblastoma multiform (GBM) clones and cell lines in culture, including U-87 MG. Omics studies in U-87 MG showed distinctive expression patterns compared to individual IFNs. Kinase signaling pathways dysregulation can also contribute to HeberFERON effects. Here, we report the first label-free quantitative proteomic and phosphoproteomic analyses to evaluate changes induced by HeberFERON after 72h incubation of U-87 MG cell line. LC-MS/MS analysis identified 7627 proteins with a fold change >2 (p<0.05); 122 and 211 were down- and up-regulated by HeberFERON, respectively. We identified 23549 peptides (5692 proteins) and 8900 phosphopeptides, 412 of these phosphopeptides (359 proteins) were differentially modified with fold change >2 (p<0.05). Proteomic enrichment analysis showed IFN signaling and its control, together to direct and indirect antiviral mechanisms were the main modulated processes. Enrichment analysis of phosphoproteome pointed to the cell cycle, cytoskeleton organization, translation and RNA splicing, autophagy, and DNA repair as biological processes represented. There is a high interconnection of phosphoproteins in a molecular network, where mTOR occupies a centric hub. HeberFERON regulates many phosphosites newly reported or with no clear association to kinases. Of interest is phosphosites increasing phosphorylation were mainly modified by CDK and ERK kinases, thus new cascades regulations can be determining the antiproliferation outcome. Our results contribute to a better mechanistic understanding of HeberFERON in the context of GBM. Significance of the StudyHeberFERON is a co-formulation of IFN-2b and -{gamma} in synergic proportion, registered for skin basal cell carcinoma treatment, also demonstrating clinical effect over solid tumors, including GBM. GBM is a very lethal tumor, protected by the blood-brain barrier (BBB), highly mutated in proliferative signaling pathways with little treatment success. Interferons have been widely used in cancer; they pass BBB and act at JAK/STAT, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, and MAPKs cascades. We observed antiproliferative effects over GBM clones and cell lines in culture. U-87 MG is used as a model to understand the HeberFERON mechanism of action in GBM. We completed the first proteomic and label-free quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis after incubation of U-87 MG cell line with HeberFERON for 72h. The main contribution of this article is the description of phosphosites regulated in proteins participating in cell cycle, cytoskeleton organization, translation, autophagy, and DNA repair in a highly interconnected molecular network, where mTOR occupies a centric hub. Together with reported phosphosites, we described new ones and others with no associated kinases. Increased phosphorylation is mainly accounted by CDK and ERK kinases pointing to possibly new cascades regulations. This knowledge will contribute to the functional understanding of HeberFERON in GBM joined to general regulatory mechanisms in cancer cells.

cancer biology↗

Selection of Sites for Field Trials of Genetically Engineered Mosquitoes with Gene Drive.

Novel malaria control strategies using genetically engineered mosquitoes (GEMs) are on the horizon. Population modification is one approach wherein mosquitoes are engineered with genes rendering them refractory to the malaria parasite coupled with a low-threshold, Cas9-based gene drive. When released into a wild vector population, GEMs preferentially transmit these beneficial genes to their offspring, ultimately modifying a vector population into a non-vector one. Deploying this technology awaits evaluation including ecologically contained field trials. Here, we consider a process for site selection, the first critical step in designing a trial. Our goal is to identify a site that maximizes prospects for success, minimizes risk, and serves as a fair, valid, and convincing test of efficacy and impacts of a GEM product intended for large-scale deployment in Africa. We base site selection on geographical, geological, and biological, rather than social or legal, criteria. We recognize the latter as critically important but not preeminent. We propose physical islands as being the best candidates for a GEM field trial and present an evaluation of 22 African islands. We consider geographic and genetic isolation, biological complexity, island size, topography, and identify two island groups that satisfy key criteria for ideal GEM field trial sites.

bioengineering↗