Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Pallavicini, I.

Publications and source records attributed to Pallavicini, I..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Cell cycle control of chromatin creates a therapeutic window for epigenetic therapy in tumors

The relationship between cell cycle length and differentiation competence is well established in developmental biology, particularly in embryonic stem cells, where a short G1 phase maintains pluripotency and G1 lengthening permits lineage commitment. Whether this principle operates in cancer cells, where the cell cycle is deregulated and G1 is frequently shortened, and whether it can be pharmacologically exploited for therapy, has not been tested. Here we show that the duration of G1 is a causal determinant of chromatin state in cancer cells and that extending G1 creates a therapeutic window for epigenetic drugs. Using acute myeloid leukemia (AML) as a model, we demonstrate that low-dose palbociclib, at concentrations well below those required for cytostatic arrest, extends G1 without halting proliferation. This modest prolongation reshapes the histone modification landscape: repressive marks (H3K9me2/3, H4K20me2/3) increase while acetylation decreases, and chromatin accessibility rises broadly in the euchromatic compartment. Naturally slow-cycling AML lines share this epigenetic signature regardless of their oncogenic driver mutations, and pharmacologically extending G1 in fast-cycling cells recapitulates it, establishing G1 length as a causal regulator of the cancer epigenome rather than a passive correlate. To identify epigenetic vulnerabilities created by G1 extension, we performed complementary drug and CRISPR-Cas9 screens in G1-extended AML cells. Both approaches converged on LSD1 (KDM1A): slow-cycling AML cells are intrinsically sensitive to LSD1 inhibition, while fast-cycling cells become sensitive when G1 is prolonged. The combination of low-dose palbociclib and LSD1 inhibition triggers differentiation and significantly prolongs survival in AML xenograft models. p21 (CDKN1A) emerges as the central molecular determinant of this response. In slow-cycling AML cells, p21 is highly expressed and its knockdown abolishes LSD1 inhibitor sensitivity. Structure-function analysis using p21 mutants separates the two known activities of p21: the CDK-inhibitory function (which extends G1) is required for sensitization, whereas the PCNA-binding function is dispensable. Three pharmacological routes converge on the same endpoint, CDK inhibition, G1 extension, and a differentiation-competent chromatin state: direct CDK4/6 inhibition by palbociclib, p21 overexpression, and p21 induction through HDAC or EZH1/2 inhibitors. Palbociclib bypasses the requirement for p21 entirely, confirming that G1 length itself, not p21 as a protein, is the critical variable. Mechanistically, the combination of G1 extension and LSD1 inhibition produces a qualitatively distinct chromatin state rather than an additive one. ATAC-seq reveals thousands of combination-exclusive accessible regions, enriched for footprints of myeloid differentiation transcription factors including SPI1/PU.1, IRF1, and STAT1/2. A double-lock principle governs this remodeling: palbociclib drives the removal of repressive marks (H3K9me3 and H3K27me3), while LSD1 inhibition installs active marks at the newly accessible regions. The ncBAF chromatin remodeling complex, identified in our CRISPR screen and validated by knockout of its essential subunits BRD9 and SMARCD1, is specifically required for this response. Loss of ncBAF abolishes the combination-induced chromatin remodeling and differentiation program but does not affect the initial G1 extension or retinoic acid-induced differentiation, indicating that ncBAF specifically couples cell-cycle modulation to chromatin remodeling rather than acting as a general differentiation factor. The principle generalizes beyond AML. In melanoma, breast cancer, and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), sensitivity to LSD1 inhibition tracks with p21 expression and cycling speed. Primary melanoma samples stratified by p21 recapitulate the same pattern: p21-high, slow-cycling cells are sensitive; p21-low, fast-cycling cells are resistant but can be sensitized by palbociclib cotreatment. Cisplatin-induced drug-tolerant persister (DTP) cells, which emerge as a slow-cycling, chemo-resistant population and upregulate both p21 and LSD1, become vulnerable to LSD1 inhibition and are eradicated by the combination. In melanoma patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, p21-high tumors respond to LSD1 inhibitor monotherapy, while p21-low tumors are sensitized by palbociclib cotreatment, with p21 knockdown abolishing the response. Together, these findings establish cell-cycle duration as a tunable regulator of the cancer epigenome and demonstrate that pharmacological G1 extension converts cytostatic CDK4/6 inhibition into an epigenetic sensitization strategy. Both fast-proliferating and slow-cycling tumor compartments (including drug-resistant persisters) can be targeted by matching the epigenomic state to the appropriate combination of cell-cycle modulators and epigenetic drugs. p21 emerges as a candidate biomarker for patient stratification. More broadly, our work repositions the cell cycle from a passive conduit for proliferation signals to an active, druggable regulator of chromatin fate, with implications that extend from cancer therapy to stem cell biology and regenerative medicine.

cancer biology↗

LSD1 inhibition improves efficacy of adoptive T cell therapy by enhancing CD8+ T cell responsiveness.

The lysine-specific histone demethylase 1A (LSD1) has been described to play a role in antitumor immunity; however, the role of LSD1 in shaping CD8+ T cell (CTL) differentiation and function is not understood. Here, we showed that pharmacological inhibition of LSD1 (LSD1i) in CTL elicited phenotypic and functional alterations of the CTL that led to robust antitumor immunity in the context of adoptive T cell therapy (ACT). In addition, the combination of anti-PDL1 therapy with LSD1i-based ACT resulted in a complete tumor eradication and long-lasting tumor-free survival. This study demonstrated that LSD1i together with anti-PDL1 therapy complement each others deficiencies and produce a better tumor response in a melanoma model, in which both immune and epigenetic therapy alone have shown limited efficacy. Collectively, these results set the translational potential of modulating LSD1 to improve antitumoral responses generated by ACT and anti-PDL1 therapy, which provide a strong rationale for a combination trial of LSD1i and immunotherapy.

immunology↗

Inhibiting LSD1 suppresses coronavirus-induced inflammation but spares innate antiviral activity

Tissue-resident macrophages exert critical but conflicting effects on the progression of coronavirus infections by secreting both anti-viral type I Interferons and tissue-damaging inflammatory cytokines. Steroids, the only class of host-targeting drugs approved for Covid19, indiscriminately suppress both responses, possibly impairing viral clearance, and provide limited clinical benefit. Here we set up a mouse in vitro co-culture system that reproduces the macrophage response to SARS-CoV2 seen in patients and allows quantitation of inflammatory and antiviral activities. We show that the NFKB-dependent inflammatory response can be selectively inhibited by ablating the lysine-demethylase LSD1, which additionally unleashed interferon-independent ISG activation and blocked viral egress through the lysosomal pathway. These results provide a rationale for repurposing LSD1 inhibitors, a class of drugs extensively studied in oncology, for Covid-19 treatment. One-Sentence SummaryTargeting a chromatin-modifying enzyme in coronavirus infections curbs tissue-damage without affecting antiviral response

immunology↗

Pharmacological inhibition of LSD1 triggers myeloid differentiation by targeting GSE1, a novel oncogene in AML

The histone de-methylase LSD1 is over-expressed in haematological tumours and has emerged as a promising target for anti-cancer treatment, so that several LSD1 inhibitors are under development and testing, in pre-clinical and clinical settings. However, the complete understanding of their complex mechanism of action is still unreached. Here, we unravelled a novel mode of action of the LSD1 inhibitors MC2580 and DDP-38003, showing that they can induce differentiation of AML cells through the down-regulation of the chromatin protein GSE1. Analysis of the phenotypic effects of GSE1 depletion in NB4 cells showed a strong decrease of cell viability in vitro and of tumour growth in vivo. Mechanistically, we found that a set of genes associated with immune response and cytokine signalling pathways are up-regulated by LSD1 inhibitors through GSE1 protein reduction and that LSD1 and GSE1 co-localise at promoters of a subset of these genes at the basal state, enforcing their transcriptional silencing. Moreover, we show that LSD1 inhibitors lead to the reduced binding of GSE1 to these promoters, activating transcriptional programs that trigger myeloid differentiation. Our study offers new insights on GSE1 as a novel therapeutic target for AML.

cancer biology↗