Biology subjects

Pachano, T.

Publications and source records attributed to Pachano, T..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Systematic Discovery of Pathogen Effector Functions across Human Pathogens and Pathways

Pathogens deploy effector proteins to exploit host cell biology, and most pathogen open reading frames (ORFs) are rapidly evolving and lack functional annotation. We developed the eORFeome, a scalable functional genomics platform encompassing 3,835 effector ORFs from diverse viruses, bacteria, and parasites. High-throughput barcoded screens across NF{kappa}B, apoptosis, p53, cGAS-STING and MHC-I pathways revealed functions for hundreds of uncharacterized eORFs, unexpected new activities for known effectors, and distinct pathway-specific functions encoded by single ORFs. Illustrating the power of the approach, we identify HHV6A U14 as a p53 antagonist, HHV7 U21 as a dual-function STING antagonist and MHC-I antigen display inhibitor, and adenoviral 13.6K/i-leader protein as a de novo evolved TAP inhibitor that suppresses MHC-I display. These results establish a general framework for systematic effector annotation, uncover new mechanisms of host-pathogen interaction across kingdoms, and highlight pathogen effectors as a versatile toolkit for rewiring and probing human cellular pathways.

systems biology↗

bioRxiv2025

Synthetic engineering demonstrates that synergy among enhancers involves an increase in transcriptionally productive enhancer-gene contacts

Enhancers are non-coding cis-regulatory elements that control the expression of distally located genes in a tissue- and time-specific manner. Recent studies indicate that enhancers can differ in their underlying genetic architecture and regulatory properties. However, these different types of enhancers were previously investigated under rather variable conditions (e.g. model organism, cell type, enhancer-promoter distance, type of target promoter, etc.), thus introducing confounding factors that make it difficult to discern the distinct regulatory properties of each enhancer type. To overcome these limitations, here we generated transgenic mouse embryonic stem cells (mESC) lines in which different types of synthetic enhancers (i.e. "typical" enhancer, CTCF-associated enhancer, enhancer cluster/super-enhancer) were built upon the same "core" neural enhancer and inserted at the same distance (i.e. 100 Kb) from a typical developmental gene (i.e. Gata6). Subsequently, the mESC lines were differentiated to systematically compare the regulatory properties of the different enhancer types under identical conditions. Regarding the CTCF-associated enhancer, our data revealed that the addition of a CTCF site to the "core" enhancer increased insulation and led to the formation of a smaller contact domain, while having a rather mild effect on enhancer-promoter contact frequency and target gene expression. On the other hand, in comparison to the "core" enhancer alone, the enhancer cluster synergistically increased target gene expression and burst fraction. Importantly, we found that, in contrast to previous models, the strong regulatory activity of the enhancer cluster can not be explained by changes in enhancer-promoter contact frequency or the formation of transcriptional condensates. Instead, our data suggest that the emergent regulatory properties of enhancer clustering preferentially entail an increase in RNA Polymerase II pause release and, thus, in the fraction of enhancer-promoter contacts that are transcriptionally productive.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2022

Polycomb repression during S/G2 phases restrain initiation of cell differentiation to the G1 phase of the cell cycle

The potential of pluripotent cells to respond to developmental cues and trigger cell differentiation is enhanced during the G1 phase of the cell cycle, but the molecular mechanisms involved are poorly understood. Variations in polycomb activity during interphase progression have been hypothesized to regulate the cell-cycle-phase-dependent transcriptional activation of differentiation genes during lineage transition in pluripotent cells. Here, we asked whether the Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1) modulates the ability of mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) to differentially respond to developmental cues depending on the phase of the cell cycle in which they are found. We discovered that recruitment of PRC1 complexes and their associated molecular functions, ubiquitination of H2AK119 and three-dimensional chromatin interactions, are enhanced during S and G2 phases compared to the G1 phase. In agreement with the accumulation of PRC1 at target promoters upon G1 phase exit, cells in S and G2 phases show firmer transcriptional repression of developmental regulator genes that is drastically perturbed upon genetic ablation of the PRC1 catalytic subunit Ring1b. Importantly, depletion of Ring1b during retinoic acid stimulation interferes with the preference of mESCs to induce the transcriptional activation of differentiation genes in G1 phase. We propose that incremental enrolment of polycomb repressive activity during interphase progression reduces the tendency of cells to respond to developmental cues during S and G2 phases, facilitating activation of cell differentiation in the G1 phase of the pluripotent cell cycle.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2021

The chromatin, topological and regulatory properties of pluripotency-associated poised enhancers are conserved in vivo

Poised enhancers (PEs) represent a limited and genetically distinct set of distal regulatory elements that control the induction of developmental genes in a hierarchical and non-redundant manner. Before becoming activated in differentiating cells, PEs are already bookmarked in pluripotent cells with unique chromatin and topological features that could contribute to their privileged regulatory properties. However, since PEs were originally identified and subsequently characterized using embryonic stem cells (ESC) as an in vitro differentiation system, it is currently unknown whether PEs are functionally conserved in vivo. Here, we generate and mine various types of genomic data to show that the chromatin and 3D structural features of PEs are conserved among mouse pluripotent cells both in vitro and in vivo. We also uncovered that, in mouse pluripotent cells, the interactions between PEs and their bivalent target genes are globally controlled by the combined action of Polycomb, Trithorax and architectural proteins. Moreover, distal regulatory sequences located close to developmental genes and displaying the typical genetic (i.e. proximity to CpG islands) and chromatin (i.e. high accessibility and H3K27me3 levels) features of PEs are commonly found across vertebrates. These putative PEs show high sequence conservation, preferentially within specific vertebrate clades, with only a small subset being evolutionary conserved across all vertebrates. Lastly, by genetically disrupting evolutionary conserved PEs in mouse and chicken embryos, we demonstrate that these regulatory elements play essential and non-redundant roles during the induction of major developmental genes in vivo.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2020

Orphan CpG islands boost the regulatory activity of poisedenhancers and dictate the responsiveness of their target genes

ARTICLECpG islands (CGIs) represent a distinctive and widespread genetic feature of vertebrate genomes, being associated with [~]70% of all annotated gene promoters1. CGIs have been proposed to control transcription initiation by conferring nearby promoters with unique chromatin properties2-4. In addition, there are thousands of distal or orphan CGIs (oCGIs) whose functional relevance and mechanism of action are barely known5-7. Here we show that oCGIs are an essential component of poised enhancers (PEs)8, 9 that boost their long-range regulatory activity and dictate the responsiveness of their target genes. Using a CRISPR/Cas9 knock-in strategy in mESC, we introduced PEs with or without oCGIs within topological associating domains (TADs) harbouring genes with different types of promoters. By evaluating the chromatin, topological and regulatory properties of the engineered PEs, we uncover that, rather than increasing their local activation, oCGIs boost the physical and functional communication between PEs and distally located developmental genes. Furthermore, we demonstrate that developmental genes with CpG rich promoters are particularly responsive to PEs and that such responsiveness depends on the presence of oCGIs. Therefore, our work unveils a novel role for CGIs as genetic determinants of the compatibility between genes and enhancers, thus providing major insights into how developmental gene expression programs are deployed under both physiological and pathological conditions10-12.

genetics↗