Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ossandon, T.

Publications and source records attributed to Ossandon, T..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Aperiodic exponent of brain field potentials is dependent on the frequency range it is estimated

The aperiodic component of brain field potentials, like EEG, LFP and intracortical recordings, has shown to be a valuable tool in basic neuroscience and in clinical applications. Aperiodic activity is modeled as a power law of the power spectral density, with the aperiodic exponent as the key parameter. Part of the interest in this parameter lies in its proposed role as a marker of the balance between excitatory and inhibitory cortical activity. In theory, a perfect power law would imply that the same behaviour exists across all frequencies, however recent evidence has suggested that low and high frequency ranges could present different aperiodic exponents. To elucidate this, we systematically evaluated the relation between frequency range and aperiodic parameters using human resting-state intracortical recordings from 62 patients. We employed two distinct estimation methods, Specparam and IRASA. We found that aperiodic parameters were indeed dependent on frequency range. Specifically, we found that low frequency ranges displayed, on average, lower aperiodic exponents (flatter power spectral density) than high frequency ranges. This behaviour was consistent for Specparam and IRASA estimations in all frequency ranges compatible with EEG. Given that there is currently no consensus for a single frequency range to be used in either clinical or basic neuroscience, our results show that care should be taken when comparing aperiodic exponents derived from different frequency ranges. We believe our results also encourage further research into the possible roles that aperiodic exponents estimated from different frequency ranges could have in reflecting distinct aspects of cortical systems.

neuroscience↗

Complexity and 1/f slope jointly reflect cortical states across different E/I balances

Characterization of brain states is essential for understanding its functioning in the absence of external stimuli. Brain states differ on their balance between excitation and inhibition, and on the diversity of their activity patterns. These can be respectively indexed by 1/f slope and Lempel-Ziv Complexity (LZc). However, whether and how these two brain state properties relate remain elusive. Here we analyzed the relation between 1/f slope and LZc with two in-silico approaches and in both rat EEG and monkey ECoG data. We contrasted resting state with propofol anesthesia, which directly modulates the excitation-inhibition balance. We found convergent results among simulated and empirical data, showing a strong, inverse and non trivial monotonic relation between 1/f slope and complexity, consistent at both ECoG and EEG scales. We hypothesize that differentially entropic regimes could underlie the link between the excitation-inhibition balance and the vastness of the repertoire of brain systems.

neuroscience↗

FRONTAL MIDLINE THETA REFLECTS COGNITIVE CONTROL DURING PLANNING.

Neural correlates of cognitive planning are not understood well at present. Behavioral paradigms targeting this function are a current challenge in cognitive neuroscience. We recorded EEG activity while subjects were performing a novel behavioral paradigm that evaluates cognitive planning function. Participants showed longer reaction times and decreased accuracy during the planning condition compared to the control condition, suggesting that the planning condition is more time consuming, therefore reflecting higher cognitive demand. Moreover, cognitive planning induced a frontal midline theta (FM{theta}) frequency band originating in prefrontal cortex (PFC) as shown in previous cognitive control studies. When subjects began planning, there was a progressive and sustained increase in FM{theta} starting after 500 milliseconds (ms) of planning. Hence, we characterized for first time, both spatial and temporal FM{theta} dynamics of cognitive planning as a marker of cognitive control function.

neuroscience↗