Biology subjects

Orpella, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Orpella, J..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2022

Global Motor Inhibition Precedes Stuttering Events

Research points to neurofunctional differences underlying fluent speech between stutterers and non-stutterers. Considerably less work has focused on processes that underlie stuttered vs. fluent speech. Additionally, most of this research has focused on speech motor processes despite contributions from cognitive processes that occur prior to the onset of stuttered speech. We used MEG to test the hypothesis that reactive inhibitory control is triggered prior to stuttered speech. Twenty-nine stutterers completed a delayed-response task that featured a cue (prior to a go cue) signaling the imminent requirement to produce a word that was either stuttered or fluent. Consistent with our hypothesis, we observed increased beta power in the R-preSMA -an area implicated in reactive inhibitory control- in response to the cue preceding stuttered vs. fluent productions. Beta power differences between stuttered and fluent trials correlated with stuttering severity and participants percentage of trials stuttered increased exponentially with beta power in the R-preSMA. Trial-by-trial beta power modulations in the R-preSMA following the cue predicted whether a trial would be stuttered or fluent. Stuttered trials were also associated with delayed speech onset suggesting an overall slowing or freezing of the speech motor system that may be a consequence of inhibitory control. Post-hoc analyses revealed that independently-generated anticipated words were associated with greater beta power and more stuttering than researcher-assisted anticipated words, pointing to a relationship between self-perceived likelihood of stuttering (i.e., anticipation) and inhibitory control. This work offers a neurocognitive account of stuttering by characterizing the cognitive processes that precede overt stuttering events.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

Speech imagery decoding as a window to speech planning and production

Speech imagery (the ability to generate internally quasi-perceptual experiences of speech) is a fundamental ability linked to cognitive functions such as inner speech, phonological working memory, and predictive processing. Speech imagery is also considered an ideal tool to test theories of overt speech. The study of speech imagery is challenging, primarily because of the absence of overt behavioral output as well as the difficulty in temporally aligning imagery events across trials and individuals. We used magnetoencephalography (MEG) paired with temporal-generalization-based neural decoding and a simple behavioral protocol to determine the processing stages underlying speech imagery. We monitored participants lip and jaw micromovements during mental imagery of syllable production using electromyography. Decoding participants imagined syllables revealed a sequence of task-elicited representations. Importantly, participants micromovements did not discriminate between syllables. The decoded sequence of neuronal patterns maps well onto the predictions of current computational models of overt speech motor control and provides evidence for hypothesized internal and external feedback loops for speech planning and production, respectively. Additionally, the results expose the compressed nature of representations during planning which contrasts with the natural rate at which internal productions unfold. We conjecture that the same sequence underlies the motor-based generation of sensory predictions that modulate speech perception as well as the hypothesized articulatory loop of phonological working memory. The results underscore the potential of speech imagery, based on new experimental approaches and analytical methods, and further pave the way for successful non-invasive brain-computer interfaces.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

Statistical learning as reinforcement learning phenomena

Statistical learning (SL) is the ability to extract regularities from the environment. In the domain of language, this ability is fundamental in the learning of words and structural rules. In lack of reliable online measures, statistical word and rule learning have been primarily investigated using offline (post-familiarization) tests, which gives limited insights into the dynamics of SL and its neural basis. Here, we capitalize on a novel task that tracks the online statistical learning of language rules combined with computational modelling to show that online SL responds to reinforcement learning principles rooted in striatal function. Specifically, we demonstrate - on two different cohorts - that a Temporal Difference model, which relies on prediction errors, accounts for participants online learning behavior. We then show that the trial-by-trial development of predictions through learning strongly correlates with activity in both ventral and dorsal striatum. Our results thus provide a detailed mechanistic account of language-related SL and an explanation for the oft-cited implication of the striatum in SL tasks. This work, therefore, bridges the longstanding gap between language learning and reinforcement learning phenomena.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

Population-level differences in the neural substrates supporting Statistical Learning

The ability to extract regularities from the environment is arguably an adaptive characteristic of intelligent systems. In the context of speech, statistical learning is thought to be an important mechanism for language acquisition. By considering individual differences in speech auditory-motor synchronization, an independent component analysis of fMRI data revealed that the neural substrates of statistical word form learning are not fully shared across individuals. While a network of auditory and superior pre/motor regions is universally activated in the process of learning, a fronto-parietal network is instead additionally and selectively engaged by some individuals, boosting their performance. Furthermore, interfering with the use of this network via articulatory suppression (producing irrelevant speech during learning) normalizes performance across the entire sample. Our work provides novel insights on language-related statistical learning and reconciles previous contrasting findings, while highlighting the need to factor in fundamental individual differences for a precise characterization of cognitive phenomena.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2019

Integrating When and What Information in the Left Parietal Lobe Allows Language Rule Generalization

A crucial aspect when learning a language is discovering the rules that govern how words are combined in order to convey meanings. Since rules are characterized by sequential co-occurrences between elements (e.g. These cupcakes are unbelievable), tracking the statistical relationships between these elements is fundamental. However, statistical learning alone cannot fully account for the ability to create abstract rule representations that can be generalized, a paramount requirement of linguistic rules. Here, we provide evidence that, after the statistical relations between words have been extracted, the engagement of goal-directed attention is key to enable rule generalization. Incidental learning performance during a rule-learning task on an artificial language revealed a progressive shift from statistical learning to goal-directed attention. In addition, and consistent with the recruitment of attention, fMRI analyses of late learning stages showed left parietal activity within a broad bilateral dorsal fronto-parietal network. Critically, rTMS on participants peak of activation within the left parietal cortex impaired their ability to generalize learned rules to a structurally analogous new language. No stimulation or rTMS on a non-relevant brain region did not have the same interfering effect on generalization. Performance on an additional attentional task showed that rTMS on the same parietal site hindered participants ability to integrate what (stimulus identity) and when (stimulus timing) information about an expected target. The present findings suggest that learning rules from speech is a two-stage process: following statistical learning, goal-directed attention -involving left parietal regions- integrates what and when stimulus information to facilitate rapid rule generalization.

neuroscience↗