Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Organick, L. W.

Publications and source records attributed to Organick, L. W..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

A Combinatorial PCR Method for Efficient, Selective Oligo Retrieval from Complex Oligo Pools

With the rapidly decreasing cost of array-based oligo synthesis, large-scale oligo pools offer significant benefits for advanced applications, including gene synthesis, CRISPR-based gene editing, and DNA data storage. Selectively retrieving specific oligos from these complex pools traditionally uses Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), in which any selected oligos are exponentially amplified to quickly outnumber non-selected ones. In this case, the number of orthogonal PCR primers is limited due to interactions between them. This lack of specificity presents a serious challenge, particularly for DNA data storage, where the size of an oligo pool (i.e., a DNA database) is orders of magnitude larger than it is for other applications. Although a nested file address system was recently developed to increase the number of accessible files for DNA storage, it requires a more complicated lab protocol and more expensive reagents to achieve high specificity. Instead, we developed a new combinatorial PCR method that outperforms prior work without compromising the fidelity of retrieved material or complicating wet lab processes. Our method quadratically increases the number of accessible oligos while maintaining high specificity. In experiments, we accessed three arbitrarily chosen files from a DNA prototype database that contained 81 different files. Initially comprising only 1% of the original database, the selected files were enriched to over 99.9% using our combinatorial primer method. Our method thus provides a viable path for scaling up DNA data storage systems and has broader utility whenever scientists need access to a specific target oligo and can design their own primer regions.

synthetic biology↗

A Comprehensive Study of Synthetic DNA Preservation for DNA Data Storage

Synthetic DNA has recently risen as a viable alternative for long-term digital data storage. To ensure that information is safely recovered after storage, it is essential to appropriately preserve the physical DNA molecules encoding the data. While preservation of biological DNA has been studied previously, synthetic DNA differs in that it is typically much shorter in length, it has different sequence profiles with fewer, if any, repeats (or homopolymers), and it has different contaminants. In this paper we evaluate nine different methods used to preserve data files encoded in synthetic DNA by accelerated aging of nearly 29,000 DNA sequences. In addition to a molecular count comparison, we also sequence and analyze the DNA after aging. Our findings show that errors and erasures are stochastic and show no practical distribution difference between preservation methods. Finally, we compare the physical density of these methods and provide a stability versus density trade-offs discussion.

synthetic biology↗

Experimental Assessment of PCR Specificity and Copy Number for Reliable Data Retrieval in DNA Storage

Synthetic DNA has been gaining momentum as a potential storage medium for archival data storage1-9. Digital information is translated into sequences of nucleotides and the resulting synthetic DNA strands are then stored for later individual file retrieval via PCR7-9 (Fig. 1a). Using a previously presented encoding scheme9 and new experiments, we demonstrate reliable file recovery when as few as 10 copies per sequence are stored, on average. This results in density of about 17 exabytes/g, nearly two orders of magnitude greater than prior work has shown6. Further, no prior work has experimentally demonstrated access to specific files in a pool more complex than approximately 106 unique DNA sequences9, leaving the issue of accurate file retrieval at high data density and complexity unexamined. Here, we demonstrate successful PCR random access using three files of varying sizes in a complex pool of over 1010 unique sequences, with no evidence that we have begun to approach complexity limits. We further investigate the role of file size on successful data recovery, the effect of increasing sequencing coverage to aid file recovery, and whether DNA strands drop out of solution in a systematic manner. These findings substantiate the robustness of PCR as a random access mechanism in complex settings, and that the number of copies needed for data retrieval does not compromise density significantly.\n\nO_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=111 SRC=\"FIGDIR/small/565150_fig1.gif\" ALT=\"Figure 1\">\nView larger version (29K):\norg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4b79a7org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@11fca45org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@18b830org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e47101_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 1.C_FLOATNO (a) A high-level representation of the DNA data storage pipeline. (b) (Left) The bar chart depicts contents of the initial, undiluted pool. (Right) The illustration shows the serial nature of subsequent dilutions. Mean copy number refers to the mean number of copies of each files unique sequences as determined by qPCR (Supplemental Section 1). One serial dilution used water as the diluent in each step; the other used a solution of 150Nmers to dilute the pool to much greater complexity. (c) Details of how the samples were diluted. Note that the dilution steps were identical regardless of diluent. The smallest percent of pool accessed is calculated by dividing the size of the smallest file by the number of unique sequences in the 1 {micro}L of solution used for PCR random access. This percentage refers to the 150N diluent pool since the small file in the water diluent pool is a constant 0.13%.\n\nC_FIG

synthetic biology↗