Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Oprea, T.

Publications and source records attributed to Oprea, T..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Node-degree aware edge sampling mitigates inflated classification performance in biomedical graph representation learning

Graph representation learning is a family of related approaches that learn low-dimensional vector representations of nodes and other graph elements called embeddings. Embeddings approximate characteristics of the graph and can be used for a variety of machine-learning tasks such as novel edge prediction. For many biomedical applications, partial knowledge exists about positive edges that represent relationships between pairs of entities, but little to no knowledge is available about negative edges that represent the explicit lack of a relationship between two nodes. For this reason, classification procedures are forced to assume that the vast majority of unlabeled edges are negative. Existing approaches to sampling negative edges for training and evaluating classifiers do so by uniformly sampling pairs of nodes. We show here that this sampling strategy typically leads to sets of positive and negative edges with imbalanced edge degree distributions. Using representative homogeneous and heterogeneous biomedical knowledge graphs, we show that this strategy artificially inflates measured classification performance. We present a degree-aware node sampling approach for sampling negative edge examples that mitigates this effect and is simple to implement.

bioinformatics↗

The impact of sex on alternative splicing

Over 95% of human genes undergo alternative splicing (AS) in a developmental, tissue-specific, or signal transduction-dependent manner. Here, we present a large-scale survey of sex-biased differential alternative splicing (DAS) across 7027 samples of 39 tissues from 532 individuals (351 males and 181 females) from the Genotype-Tissue Expression project. We detected a total of 1278 statistically significant DAS events affecting 888 different genes and 4417 significant differential gene expression (DGE) events in 3221 genes. Only 267 (29.3%) of the differentially spliced genes were also differentially expressed. Genes that displayed sex-biased DGE or DAS across multiple tissues were enriched in functions related to signaling including histone demethylation. The probability of a gene showing significant differential AS varies by chromosome and is highest for the X chromosome, with differentially spliced X chromosomal genes additionally being more likely to escape X chromosomal inactivation. A small but significant association was found between sex-biased AS and transcripts that undergo physiological nonsense-mediated decay (NMD). We show a significant overlap of differential splicing and genes that display estrogen-induced alternative splicing, that are involved in estrogen response pathway. Further, we show overlap of the involved exons with estrogen-receptor bindings sites. Our results provide a comprehensive survey of sex-biased AS and its characteristics across a large collection of human tissues.

genomics↗

Drug Target Ontology to Classify and Integrate Drug Discovery Data

BackgroundOne of the most successful approaches to develop new small molecule therapeutics has been to start from a validated druggable protein target. However, only a small subset of potentially druggable targets has attracted significant research and development resources. The Illuminating the Druggable Genome (IDG) project develops resources to catalyze the development of likely targetable, yet currently understudied prospective drug targets. A central component of the IDG program is a comprehensive knowledge resource of the druggable genome.\n\nResultsAs part of that effort, we have been developing a framework to integrate, navigate, and analyze drug discovery data based on formalized and standardized classifications and annotations of druggable protein targets, the Drug Target Ontology (DTO). DTO was constructed by extensive curation and consolidation of various resources. DTO classifies the four major drug target protein families, GPCRs, kinases, ion channels and nuclear receptors, based on phylogenecity, function, target development level, disease association, tissue expression, chemical ligand and substrate characteristics, and target-family specific characteristics. The formal ontology was built using a new software tool to auto-generate most axioms from a database while also supporting manual knowledge acquisition. A modular, hierarchical implementation facilitates development and maintenance and makes use of various external ontologies, thus integrating the DTO into the ecosystem of biomedical ontologies. As a formal OWL-DL ontology, DTO contains asserted and inferred axioms. Modeling data from the Library of Integrated Network-based Cellular Signatures (LINCS) program illustrates the potential of DTO for contextual data integration and nuanced definition of important drug target characteristics. DTO has been implemented in the IDG user interface Portal, Pharos and the TIN-X explorer of protein target disease relationships.\n\nConclusionsDTO was built based on the need for a formal semantic model for druggable targets including various related information such as protein, gene, protein domain, protein structure, binding site, small molecule drug, mechanism of action, protein tissue localization, disease association, and many other types of information. DTO will further facilitate the otherwise challenging integration and formal linking to biological assays, phenotypes, disease models, drug poly-pharmacology, binding kinetics and many other processes, functions and qualities that are at the core of drug discovery. The first version of DTO is publically available via the website http://drugtargetontology.org/, Github (https://github.com/DrugTargetOntology/DTO), and the NCBO Bioportal (https://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/DTO). The long-term goal of DTO is to provide such an integrative framework and to populate the ontology with this information as a community resource.

bioinformatics↗