Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Onorato, I.

Publications and source records attributed to Onorato, I..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Optogenetic stimulation reveals frequency-dependent resonance and encoding in V1 excitatory and inhibitory neurons

Cortical information processing is thought to be facilitated by the resonant properties of individual neurons and neuronal networks, which selectively amplify inputs at specific frequencies. We used optogenetics to test how different input frequencies are encoded by excitatory cells and parvalbumin-expressing (PV) interneurons in mouse V1. Spike phase-locking and power increased with frequency, reaching a broad peak around 80-100Hz. This effect was observed only for Chronos, a fast-kinetic opsin, but not for Channelrhodopsin-2. Surprisingly, neurons did not exhibit narrow-band resonance in specific frequency-ranges, and showed reliably phase-locking up to 140Hz. Strong phase-locking at high frequencies reflected non-linear input/output transformations, with neurons firing only in a narrow part of the cycle. By contrast, low-frequency inputs were encoded in a more continuous manner. Correspondingly, spectral coherence and firing rates showed little dependence on frequency and did not reflect transferred power. To investigate whether strong phase-locking facilitated the reliable encoding of inputs, we analyzed various spike-train distances and Fano factor. Interestingly, responses to lower rather than higher frequencies had more globally reliable spike-counts and timing structure. These findings have various practical implications for understanding the effects of optogenetic stimulation and choice of opsin. Furthermore, they show both PV and excitatory neurons respond with more local precision, i.e. phase-locking, to high-frequency inputs, but have more globally reliable responses to low-frequency inputs, suggesting differential coding regimes for these frequencies.

neuroscience↗

Distinct roles of PV and Sst interneurons in visually-induced gamma oscillations

Sensory processing relies on interactions between excitatory and inhibitory neurons, which are often coordinated by 30-80Hz gamma oscillations. However, the specific contributions of distinct interneurons to gamma synchronization remain unclear. We performed high-density recordings from V1 in awake mice and used optogenetics to identify PV+ (Parvalbumin) and Sst+ (Somatostatin) interneurons. PV interneurons were highly phase-locked to visually-induced gamma oscillations. Sst cells were heterogeneous, with only a subset of narrow-waveform cells showing strong gamma phase-locking. Interestingly, PV interneurons consistently fired at an earlier phase in the gamma cycle ({approx}6ms or 60 degrees) than Sst interneurons. Consequently, PV and Sst activity showed differential temporal relations with excitatory cells. In particular, the 1st and 2nd spikes in burst events, which were strongly gamma phase-locked, shortly preceded PV and Sst activity, respectively. These findings indicate a primary role of PV interneurons in synchronizing excitatory cells and suggest that PV and Sst interneurons control the excitability of somatic and dendritic neural compartments with precise time delays coordinated by gamma oscillations.

neuroscience↗

Gamma-cycle duration predicts instantaneous amplitude, spike rate and synchrony in macaque V1.

Circuits of excitatory and inhibitory neurons can generate rhythmic activity in the gamma frequency-range (30-80Hz). Individual gamma-cycles show spontaneous variability in amplitude and duration. The mechanisms underlying this variability are not fully understood. We recorded local-field-potentials (LFPs) and spikes from awake macaque V1, and developed a noise-robust method to detect gamma-cycle amplitudes and durations. Amplitudes and durations showed a weak but positive correlation. This correlation, and the joint amplitude-duration distribution, is well reproduced by a dampened harmonic oscillator driven by stochastic noise. We show that this model accurately fits LFP power spectra and is equivalent to a linear PING (Pyramidal Interneuron Network Gamma) circuit. The model recapitulates two additional features of V1 gamma: (1) Amplitude-duration correlations decrease with oscillation strength; (2) Amplitudes and durations exhibit strong and weak autocorrelations, respectively, depending on oscillation strength. Finally, longer gamma-cycles are associated with stronger spike-synchrony, but lower spike-rates in both (putative) excitatory and inhibitory neurons. In sum, V1 gamma-dynamics are well described by the simplest possible model of gamma: A linear harmonic oscillator driven by noise.

neuroscience↗

A distinct class of bursting neurons with strong gamma synchronization and stimulus selectivity in monkey V1

Cortical computation depends on interactions between excitatory and inhibitory neurons. The contributions of distinct neuron-types to sensory processing and network synchronization in primate visual-cortex remain largely undetermined. We show that in awake monkey V1, there exists a distinct cell-type ({approx}30% of neurons) that has narrow-waveform action-potentials, high spontaneous discharge-rates, and fires in high-frequency bursts. These neurons are more stimulus-selective and phase-locked to gamma (30-80Hz) oscillations as compared to other neuron types. Unlike the other neuron-types, their gamma phase-locking is highly predictive of their orientation tuning. We find evidence for strong rhythmic inhibition in these neurons, suggesting that they interact with interneurons to act as excitatory pacemakers for the V1 gamma rhythm. These neurons have not been observed in other primate cortical areas and we find that they are not present in rodent V1. However, they resemble the excitatory \"chattering\" neurons previously identified by intracellular recordings in cat V1. Given its properties, this neuron type should be pivotal for the encoding and transmission of V1 stimulus information.

neuroscience↗