Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Oling, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Oling, S..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Isoform-level resolution in single-cell CRISPR screens reveals hidden functional consequences of gene perturbation

Single-cell CRISPR screens have enabled systematic investigation of gene function, but studies have largely focused on gene-level effects, overlooking transcriptional complexity and isoform usage. Methods capable of capturing splicing and isoform usage have emerged, including long-read sequencing and alternative library preparation strategies, but their suitability for large-scale perturbation screens remains unevaluated. We compare two library preparation methods (10x Genomics and Parse Biosciences) across Illumina short-read, Oxford Nanopore, and PacBio long-read sequencing, applying CRISPRi to silence three genes with distinct regulatory roles (DDX6, GEMIN5, GFI1B) in K562 cells. While short-read methods detected some splicing events, only long-read sequencing consistently captured isoform-level changes. Although Parse provided even transcript coverage, we observed strong intronic read enrichment, limiting its utility for splicing analysis. The primary constraint of long-read approaches was sequencing depth: [~]21 million reads are needed for 80% saturation of splicing events in a single perturbation. Notably, GEMIN5 knockdown produced only modest differential expression but the most extensive splicing changes, an effect invisible to gene-level analysis, underscoring the value of isoform-level screens. We provide a practical framework for isoform-level analysis in single-cell CRISPR screens, identifying current capabilities and limitations. As perturbation studies scale, long-read sequencing will be essential for comprehensive functional interpretation, capturing biology missed by gene-level analysis. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=49 SRC="FIGDIR/small/737410v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (14K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@14bb963org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@783205org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@11c0233org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d468fe_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

genomics↗

Neutralisation sensitivity of the SARS-CoV-2 BA.2.87.1 variant

Against the backdrop of the rapid global takeover and dominance of BA.1/BA.2 and subsequently BA.2.86 lineages, the emergence of a highly divergent SARS-CoV-2 variant warrants characterization and close monitoring. Recently, another such BA.2 descendent, designated BA.2.87.1, was detected in South Africa. Here, we show using spike-pseudotyped viruses that BA.2.87.1 is less resistant to neutralisation by prevailing antibody responses in Sweden than other currently circulating variants such as JN.1. Further we show that a monovalent XBB.1.5-adapted booster enhanced neutralising antibody titers to BA.2.87.1 by almost 4-fold. While BA.2.87.1 may not outcompete other currently-circulating lineages, the repeated emergence and transmission of highly diverged variants suggests that another large antigenic shift, similar to the replacement by Omicron, may be likely in the future.

immunology↗