Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ogut, F.

Publications and source records attributed to Ogut, F..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Optimizing marker density for maximizing the accuracy of genomic prediction and heritability estimates in three major North American and European spruce species

Genomic prediction, also called genomic selection (GS), is being increasingly used in tree breeding with aim to accelerate genetic gains by shortening the long breeding cycles. However, high genotyping costs remain a challenge. This study aimed to determine the optimal marker density in genome coverage, to maximize GS accuracy and precision of heritability estimates for growth and wood quality traits. Thousands of SNPs representative of the exome of three major spruce species were used: 18,275 SNPs for black spruce (representing 10,894 distinct gene loci), 11,328 SNPs for white spruce (8647 gene loci), and 116,765 SNPs for Norway spruce (20,695 gene loci). For each species, a similar experimental design was used with related full-sib families replicated on two sites, and GBLUP prediction models were developed. The effect of varying the number of SNPs was examined by re-sampling subsets from 500 to 100,000 SNPs. Results indicated that plateaus in heritability estimates were reached as the marker density increased, stabilizing between 4000 to 8000 SNPs for a spruce genome size of around 2000 centimogans, a trend consistent across all traits and species. Predictive ability and prediction accuracy both increased with the number of SNPs up to a similar level, beyond which further improvements were marginal. Such optimal marker density should be financially attainable for most spruce breeding programs, striking a balance between the need for maximizing accuracy and that for minimizing genotyping costs. These findings should support the further deployment of GS in conifer breeding programs, with high selection precision and by reducing the financial burden of very high-density SNP coverage, even for conifers characterized by large giga-genomes.

genomics↗

Experimental design for large scale omic studies

Molecular phenotyping has expanded from small sample sizes to larger complex studies and are now a common element in genetic studies. When large scale studies add a molecular phenotyping component, balancing omics batches for the factors of interest (e.g. treatment), regardless of the initial sample collection strategy always improves power. Where possible, confounding sources of experimental error that are not of interest (sample collection blocks and data collection plates) improves power as does planning batches for molecular phenotyping based on constraints during initial sample collection. Power for testing differences in molecular phenotypes is always higher when accounting for the entire experimental design during modeling. The inclusion of metadata that tracks sources variation is critical to our shared goals of enabling reproducible research.

genetics↗

Comparison of one-stage and two-stage genome-wide association studies

Linear mixed models are widely used in humans, animals, and plants to conduct genome-wide association studies (GWAS). A characteristic of experimental designs for plants is that experimental units are typically multiple-plant plots of families or lines that are replicated across environments. This structure can present computational challenges to conducting a genome scan on raw (plot-level) data. Two-stage methods have been proposed to reduce the complexity and increase the computational speed of whole-genome scans. The first stage of the analysis fits raw data to a model including environment and line effects, but no individual marker effects. The second stage involves the whole genome scan of marker tests using summary values for each line as the dependent variable. Missing data and unbalanced experimental designs can result in biased estimates of marker association effects from two-stage analyses. In this study, we developed a weighted two-stage analysis to reduce bias and improve power of GWAS while maintaining the computational efficiency of two-stage analyses. Simulation based on real marker data of a diverse panel of maize inbred lines was used to compare power and false discovery rate of the new weighted two-stage method to single-stage and other two-stage analyses and to compare different two-stage models. In the case of severely unbalanced data, only the weighted two-stage GWAS has power and false discovery rate similar to the one-stage analysis. The weighted GWAS method has been implemented in the open-source software TASSEL.

genetics↗