Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ogilvie, H. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Ogilvie, H. A..

12 recordsLinked to original sources

tMHG-Finder: Tree-guided Maximal Homologous Group Finder for Bacterial Genomes

A maximal homologous group, or MHG, as a group of sequences with a shared evolutionary ancestry, shifts the focus from a genecentric view to a homology-centric view in comparative genomic studies. Each MHG is formed by identifying and grouping all homologous sequences, which ensures that evolutionary events, such as horizontal gene transfer, gene duplication and loss, or de novo sequence evolution, are encapsulated within the same MHG. However, the current MHG computation tool, MHG-Finder, faces challenges in scalability to handle large datasets and lacks the ability to provide detailed insights into intermediate MHGs involving subsets of input genomes. We present tMHG-Finder (https://github.com/yongze-yin/tMHG-Finder), a new method that improves our previous method, MHG-Finder, by utilizing a guide tree to significantly improve scalability and provide more informative biological results. We also introduce a new measure, fractionalization (available at https://github.com/yongze-yin/Fract-Calculator), to assess the accuracy of delineated MHGs compared to ground truth data. Our results show that tMHG-Finder scales linearly with the number of taxa, requiring a small fraction of the computational time of MHG-Finder. Furthermore, according to the fractionalization measure, tMHG-Finder outperforms four state-of-the-art whole-genome aligners on simulated data. Applying tMHG-Finder to a phylum of extreme-environment-resistant bacteria, we validated our results through the encapsulation of 16S rRNA sequences within MHGs. We further investigated how evolutionary rates change with phylogenetic distance and explored the functional roles of genes captured by conserved MHGs, demonstrating the broader utility of tMHG-Finder in uncovering evolutionary insights beyond MHG delineation and phylogenetic relationships.

evolutionary biology↗

Evolutionary trajectories of immune escape across cancers

Immune escape is a critical hallmark of cancer progression and underlies resistance to multiple immunotherapies. However, it remains unclear when the genetic events associated with immune escape occur during cancer development. Here, we integrate functional genomics studies of immunomodulatory genes with a tumor evolution reconstruction approach to infer the evolution of immune escape across 38 cancer types from the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes dataset. Different cancers favor mutations in different immunomodulatory pathways. For example, the antigen presentation machinery is highly mutated in colorectal adenocarcinoma, lung squamous cell carcinoma, and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, and the protein methylation pathway is highly mutated in bladder transitional cell carcinoma and lung adenocarcinoma. We also observe different timing patterns in multiple immunomodulatory pathways. For instance, mutations impacting genes involved in cellular amino acid metabolism were more likely to happen late in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Mutations in the glucocorticoid receptor regulatory network pathway tended to occur early, while mutations in the TNF pathways were more likely to occur late in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Mutations in the NOD1/2 signaling pathway and DNA binding transcription factor activity tended to happen late in breast adenocarcinoma and ovarian adenocarcinoma. Together, these results delineate the evolutionary trajectories of immune escape in different cancer types and highlight opportunities for improved immunotherapy of cancer. SignificanceDespite its critical role in cancer progression, the evolution of immune escape is poorly understood. We integrate functional genomics and tumor evolution reconstruction and infer immune escape trajectories across cancer types. Our results have important implications for developing biomarkers for immunoprevention and treatment strategies for immune escape of cancer.

evolutionary biology↗

The impact of model misspecification on phylogenetic network inference

1The development of statistical methods to infer species phylogenies with reticulations (species networks) has led to many discoveries of gene flow between distinct species. These methods typically assume only incomplete lineage sorting and introgression. Given that phylogenetic networks can be arbitrarily complex, these methods might compensate for model misspecification by increasing the number of dimensions beyond the true value. Herein, we explore the effect of potential model misspecification, including the negligence of gene tree estimation error (GTEE) and assumption of a single substitution rate for all genomic loci, on the accuracy of phylogenetic network inference using both simulated and biological data. In particular, we assess the accuracy of estimated phylogenetic networks as well as test statistics for determining whether a network is the correct evolutionary history, as opposed to the simpler model that is a tree. We found that while GTEE negatively impacts the performance of test statistics to determine the "tree-ness" of the evolutionary history of a data set, running those tests on triplets of taxa and correcting for multiple testing significantly ameliorates the problem. We also found that accounting for substitution rate heterogeneity improves the reliability of full Bayesian inference methods of phylogenetic networks, whereas summary statistic methods are robust to GTEE and rate heterogeneity, though currently require manual inspection to determine the network complexity.

evolutionary biology↗

Comparing Inference under the MSC versus the MSC-with-Recombination

Accurate inference of population parameters plays a pivotal role in unravelling the evolutionary histories. While recombination has been universally accepted as a fundamental process in the evolution of sexually reproducing organisms, it remains challenging to model it exactly. Thus, existing coalescent-based approaches make different assumptions or approximations to facilitate phylogenetic inference, which can potentially bring about biases in estimates of evolutionary parameters when recombination is present. In this article, we evaluate the performance of population parameters estimation using three classes of methods: StarBEAST2, SNAPP, and diCal2. We performed whole-genome simulations in which recombination rates, mutation rates, and levels of ILS were varied. We show that StarBEAST2 using short or medium-sized loci is robust to realistic rates of recombination, which is in agreement with previous studies. SNAPP, as expected, is generally unaffected by recombination events. Most surprisingly, diCal2, a method that is designed to explicitly account for recombination, performs considerably worse than other methods under comparison.

evolutionary biology↗

Phylogenetic Network Dissimilarity Measures That Take Branch Lengths Into Account

Dissimilarity measures for phylogenetic trees have long been used for analyzing inferred trees and understanding the performance of phylogenetic methods. Given their importance, a wide array of such measures have been developed, some of which are based on the tree topologies alone, and others that also take branch lengths into account. Similarly, a number of dissimilarity measures of phylogenetic networks have been developed in the last two decades. However, to the best of our knowledge, all these measures are based solely on the topologies of phylogenetic networks and ignore branch lengths. In this paper, we propose two phylogenetic network dissimilarity measures that take both topology and branch lengths into account. We demonstrate the behavior of these two measures on pairs of related networks. Furthermore, we show how these measures can be used to cluster a set of phylogenetic networks obtained by an inference method, illustrating this application on the posterior sample of phylogenetic networks. Both measures are implemented in the publicly available software package PhyloNet.

evolutionary biology↗

Phylogenomic assessment of the role of hybridization and introgression in trait evolution

Trait evolution among a set of species--a central theme in evolutionary biology--has long been understood and analyzed with respect to a species tree. However, the field of phylogenomics, which has been propelled by advances in sequencing technologies, has ushered in the era of species/gene tree incongruence and, consequently, a more nuanced understanding of trait evolution. For a trait whose states are incongruent with the branching patterns in the species tree, the same state could have arisen independently in different species (homoplasy) or followed the branching patterns of gene trees, incongruent with the species tree (hemiplasy). Another evolutionary process whose extent and significance are better revealed by phylogenomic studies is gene flow between different species. In this work, we present a phylogenomic method for assessing the role of hybridization and introgression in the evolution of polymorphic or monomorphic binary traits. We apply the method to simulated evolutionary scenarios to demonstrate the interplay between the parameters of the evolutionary history and the role of introgression in a binary traits evolution (which we call xenoplasy). Very importantly, we demonstrate, including on a biological data set, that inferring a species tree and using it for trait evolution analysis in the presence of gene flow could lead to misleading hypotheses about trait evolution.

evolutionary biology↗

Variational Inference Using Approximate Likelihood Under the Coalescent With Recombination

Coalescent methods are proven and powerful tools for population genetics, phylogenetics, epidemiology, and other fields. A promising avenue for the analysis of large genomic alignments, which are increasingly common, are coalescent hidden Markov model (coalHMM) methods, but these methods have lacked general usability and flexibility. We introduce a novel method for automatically learning a coalHMM and inferring the posterior distributions of evolutionary parameters using black-box variational inference, with the transition rates between local genealogies derived empirically by simulation. This derivation enables our method to work directly with three or four taxa and through a divide-and-conquer approach with more taxa. Using a simulated data set resembling a human-chimp-gorilla scenario, we show that our method has comparable or better accuracy to previous coalHMM methods. Both species divergence times and population sizes were accurately inferred. The method also infers local genealogies and we report on their accuracy. Furthermore, we illustrate how to scale the method to larger data sets through a divide-and-conquer approach. This accuracy means our method is useful now, and by deriving transition rates by simulation it is flexible enough to enable future implementations of all kinds of population models.

evolutionary biology↗

Practical Speedup of Bayesian Inference of Species Phylogenies by Restricting the Space of Gene Trees

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWSpecies tree inference from multi-locus data has emerged as a powerful paradigm in the post-genomic era, both in terms of the accuracy of the species tree it produces as well as in terms of elucidating the processes that shaped the evolutionary history. Bayesian methods for species tree inference are desirable in this area as they have been shown to yield accurate estimates, but also to naturally provide measures of confidence in those estimates. However, the heavy computational requirements of Bayesian inference have limited the applicability of such methods to very small data sets. In this paper, we show that the computational efficiency of Bayesian inference under the multispecies coalescent can be improved in practice by restricting the space of the gene trees explored during the random walk, without sacrificing accuracy as measured by various metrics. The idea is to first infer constraints on the trees of the individual loci in the form of unresolved gene trees, and then to restrict the sampler to consider only resolutions of the constrained trees. We demonstrate the improvements gained by such an approach on both simulated and biological data.

bioinformatics↗

Practical Aspects of Phylogenetic Network Analysis Using PhyloNet

Phylogenetic networks extend trees to enable simultaneous modeling of both vertical and horizontal evolutionary processes. PhyloNet is a software package that has been under constant development for over 10 years and includes a wide array of functionalities for inferring and analyzing phylogenetic networks. These functionalities differ in terms of the input data they require, the criteria and models they employ, and the types of information they allow to infer about the networks beyond their topologies. Furthermore, PhyloNet includes functionalities for simulating synthetic data on phylogenetic networks, quantifying the topological differences between phylogenetic networks, and evaluating evolutionary hypotheses given in the form of phylogenetic networks.\n\nIn this paper, we use a simulated data set to illustrate the use of several of PhyloNets functionalities and make recommendations on how to analyze data sets and interpret the results when using these functionalities. All inference methods that we illustrate are incomplete lineage sorting (ILS) aware; that is, they account for the potential of ILS in the data while inferring the phylogenetic network. While the models do not include gene duplication and loss, we discuss how the methods can be used to analyze data in the presence of polyploidy.\n\nThe concept of species is irrelevant for the computational analyses enabled by PhyloNet in that species-individuals mappings are user-defined. Consequently, none of the functionalities in PhyloNet deals with the task of species delimitation. In this sense, the data being analyzed could come from different individuals within a single species, in which case population structure along with potential gene flow is inferred (assuming the data has sufficient signal), or from different individuals sampled from different species, in which case the species phylogeny is being inferred.

evolutionary biology↗

BEAST 2.5: An Advanced Software Platform for Bayesian Evolutionary Analysis

Elaboration of Bayesian phylogenetic inference methods has continued at pace in recent years with major new advances in nearly all aspects of the joint modelling of evolutionary data. It is increasingly appreciated that some evolutionary questions can only be adequately answered by combining evidence from multiple independent sources of data, including genome sequences, sampling dates, phenotypic data, radiocarbon dates, fossil occurrences, and biogeographic range information among others. Including all relevant data into a single joint model is very challenging both conceptually and computationally. Advanced computational software packages that allow robust development of compatible (sub-)models which can be composed into a full model hierarchy have played a key role in these developments.\n\nDeveloping such software frameworks is increasingly a major scientific activity in its own right, and comes with specific challenges, from practical software design, development and engineering challenges to statistical and conceptual modelling challenges. BEAST 2 is one such computational software platform, and was first announced over 4 years ago. Here we describe a series of major new developments in the BEAST 2 core platform and model hierarchy that have occurred since the first release of the software, culminating in the recent 2.5 release.\n\nAuthor summaryBayesian phylogenetic inference methods have undergone considerable development in recent years, and joint modelling of rich evolutionary data, including genomes, phenotypes and fossil occurrences is increasingly common. Advanced computational software packages that allow robust development of compatible (sub-)models which can be composed into a full model hierarchy have played a key role in these developments. Developing scientific software is increasingly crucial to advancement in many fields of biology. The challenges range from practical software development and engineering, distributed team coordination, conceptual development and statistical modelling, to validation and testing. BEAST 2 is one such computational software platform for phylogenetics, population genetics and phylodynamics, and was first announced over 4 years ago. Here we describe the full range of new tools and models available on the BEAST 2.5 platform, which expand joint evolutionary inference in many new directions, especially for joint inference over multiple data types, non-tree models and complex phylodynamics.

evolutionary biology↗

Inferring Species Trees Using Integrative Models of Species Evolution

Evolutionary models account for either population- or species-level processes, but usually not both. We introduce a new model, the FBD-MSC, which makes it possible for the first time to integrate both the genealogical and fossilization phenomena, by means of the multispecies coalescent (MSC) and the fossilized birth-death (FBD) processes. Using this model, we reconstruct the phylogeny representing all extant and many fossil Caninae, recovering both the relative and absolute time of speciation events. We quantify known inaccuracy issues with divergence time estimates using the popular strategy of concatenating molecular alignments, and show that the FBD-MSC solves them. Our new integrative method and empirical results advance the paradigm and practice of probabilistic total evidence analyses in evolutionary biology.

evolutionary biology↗

Bayesian Inference Of Species Networks From Multilocus Sequence Data

Reticulate species evolution, such as hybridization or introgression, is relatively common in nature. In the presence of reticulation, species relationships can be captured by a rooted phylogenetic network, and orthologous gene evolution can be modeled as bifurcating gene trees embedded in the species network. We present a Bayesian approach to jointly infer species networks and gene trees from multilocus sequence data. A novel birth-hybridization process is used as the prior for the species network. We assume a multispecies network coalescent (MSNC) prior for the embedded gene trees. We verify the ability of our method to correctly sample from the posterior distribution, and thus to infer a species network, through simulations. We reanalyze a large dataset of genes from closely related spruces, and verify the previously suggested homoploid hybridization event in this clade. Our method is available within the BEAST 2 add-on SpeciesNetwork, and thus provides a general framework for Bayesian inference of reticulate evolution.

evolutionary biology↗