Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ofir, N.

Publications and source records attributed to Ofir, N..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A bounded accumulation model of temporal generalization outperforms existing models and captures modality differences and learning effects

Multiple systems in the brain track the passage of time and can adapt their activity to temporal requirements (Paton & Buonomano, 2018). While the neural implementation of timing varies widely between neural substrates and behavioral tasks, at the algorithmic level many of these behaviors can be described as bounded accumulation (Balc & Simen, 2024). So far, from the range of temporal psychophysical tasks, the bounded accumulation model has only been applied to temporal bisection, in which participants are requested to categorize an interval as "long" or "short" (Balc & Simen, 2014; Ofir & Landau, 2022). In this work, we extend the model to fit performance in the temporal generalization task, in which participants are required to categorize an interval as being the same or different compared to a standard, or reference, duration (Wearden, 1992). Previous models of performance in this task focused on either the group level or performance of highly trained animals (Birngruber et al., 2014; Church & Gibbon, 1982; Wearden, 1992). Whether the same models can fit performance from a few hundreds of trials of single participants, necessary for comparing performance across experimental manipulations, has not been tested. A drift-diffusion model with two decision boundaries fits the data of single participants better than the previous models. We ran two experiments, one comparing performance between vision and audition and another examining the effect of learning. We found that decision boundaries can be modified independently: While the upper boundary was higher in vision compared to audition, the lower boundary decreased with learning in the task.

neuroscience↗

Motor preparation tracks decision boundary crossing in temporal decision-making

Interval timing, the ability of animals to estimate the passage of time, is thought to involve diverse neural processes rather than a single central "clock" (Paton & Buonomano, 2018). Each of the different processes engaged in interval timing follows a different dynamic path, according to its specific function. For example, attention tracks anticipated events, such as offsets of intervals (Rohenkohl & Nobre, 2011), while motor processes control the timing of the behavioral output (De Lafuente et al., 2024). Hence, different processes provide complimentary perspectives on mechanisms of time perception. The temporal bisection task, where participants categorize intervals as "long" or "short", is thought to rely on the same mechanisms as other perceptual decisions (Balc & Simen, 2014). In line with this hypothesis, we previously described an EEG potential that tracks the formation of decision following the end of the timed interval (Ofir & Landau, 2022). Here, we track the dynamics of motor preparation to investigate the formation of decision within the timed interval. In contrast to typical perceptual decisions, where motor plans for all response alternatives are prepared simultaneously (Shadlen & Kiani, 2013), we find that different temporal decisions develop sequentially. While preparation for "long" responses was already underway before interval offset, no preparation was found for "short" responses. Furthermore, within intervals categorized as "long", motor preparation was stronger at interval offset for faster responses. Our findings shed light on the unique dynamics of temporal decisions and demonstrate the importance of considering neural activity in timing tasks from multiple perspectives.

neuroscience↗