Oakeson, K. F. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2021

One Health Investigation of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Seropositivity among Pets in Households with Confirmed Human COVID-19 Cases - Utah and Wisconsin, 2020

BackgroundApproximately 67% of U.S. households have pets. Limited data are available on SARS-CoV-2 in pets. We assessed SARS-CoV-2 infection in pet cohabitants as a sub-study of an ongoing COVID-19 household transmission investigation. MethodsMammalian pets from households with [≥]1 person with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were eligible for inclusion from April-May 2020. Demographic/exposure information, oropharyngeal, nasal, rectal, and fur swabs, feces, and blood were collected from enrolled pets and tested by rRT-PCR and virus neutralization assays. FindingsWe enrolled 37 dogs and 19 cats from 34 of 41 eligible households. All oropharyngeal, nasal, and rectal swabs tested negative by rRT-PCR; one dogs fur swabs (2%) tested positive by rRT-PCR at the first animal sampling. Among 47 pets with serological results from 30 households, eight (17%) pets (4 dogs, 4 cats) from 6 (20%) households had detectable SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies. In households with a seropositive pet, the proportion of people with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 was greater (median 79%; range: 40-100%) compared to households with no seropositive pet (median 37%; range: 13-100%) (p=0.01). Thirty-three pets with serologic results had frequent daily contact ([≥]1 hour) with the human index patient before the persons COVID-19 diagnosis. Of these 33 pets, 14 (42%) had decreased contact with the human index patient after diagnosis and none (0%) were seropositive; of the 19 (58%) pets with continued contact, 4 (21%) were seropositive. InterpretationsSeropositive pets likely acquired infection from humans, which may occur more frequently than previously recognized. People with COVID-19 should restrict contact with animals. FundingCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Agriculture

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2018

Metagenomic sequencing provides insights into the location of microbial detoxification in the gut of a small mammalian herbivore

Microbial detoxification of plant defense compounds influences the use of certain plants as food sources by herbivores. The location of microbial detoxification along the gut could have profound influences on the distribution, metabolism, and tolerance to toxic compounds. Stephens woodrats (Neotoma stephensi) specialize on juniper, which is heavily defended by numerous defensive compounds, such as oxalate, phenolics, and monoterpenes. Woodrats maintain two gut chambers harboring dense microbial communities: a foregut chamber proximal to the major site of toxin absorption, and a cecal chamber in their hindgut. We performed several experiments to investigate the location of microbial detoxification in the woodrat gut. First, we measured levels of toxins across gut chambers. Compared to food material, oxalate concentrations were immediately lower in the foregut chamber, while concentrations of terpenes remain high in the foregut, and are lowest in the cecal chamber. We also conducted metagenomic sequencing of the foregut and cecal chambers to compare microbial functions. We found that the majority of genes associated with detoxification functions were more abundant in the cecal chamber. However, some genes associated with degradation of oxalate and phenolic compounds were more abundant in the foregut. Thus, it seems that microbial detoxification may take place in various chambers depending on the class of chemical compound. We hypothesize that the location of microbial detoxification could impact the tolerance of animals to these compounds, which may have ecological and evolutionary consequences.

microbiology↗