O'Neal, L. G. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2026

The B. subtilis translesion polymerase Pol Y1 is not strongly recruited to sites of replication upon different types of DNA damage

One challenge to DNA replication is the presence of unrepaired damage on the template strand, which can stall the replication machinery. This stall can be resolved by the translesion synthesis (TLS) pathway, in which specialized translesion polymerases are recruited to copy damaged DNA. Because TLS polymerases are error-prone, their activity is regulated at multiple levels to minimize unnecessary mutagenesis. Although the molecular mechanisms of bacterial TLS have been extensively studied in Escherichia coli, less is known about this pathway in other species. In E. coli, the TLS polymerase Pol IV is minimally enriched at replication forks in the absence of DNA damage but is strongly recruited upon replication stalling, enabling TLS while minimizing mutagenesis. However, we recently showed that the Bacillus subtilis TLS polymerase Pol Y1, the homolog of Pol IV, is moderately enriched near replication sites even during normal growth and is not further enriched upon treatment with the DNA damaging agent 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide (4-NQO). It is unknown whether this behavior is unique to 4-NQO or general to other types of DNA damage. In this study, we investigate the effects of four different DNA damaging agents (ultraviolet light, methyl methanesulfonate, nitrofurazone, and mitomycin C) in B. subtilis. We first characterize the contributions of the two TLS polymerases, Pol Y1 and Pol Y2, to DNA damage survival and damage-induced mutagenesis after treatment with these agents. We then use single-molecule fluorescence microscopy to measure the localization and dynamics of individual Pol Y1 molecules in live B. subtilis cells. We find that Pol Y1 and Pol Y2 have differing effects on survival and mutagenesis, but that under no circumstances is Pol Y1 strongly recruited to sites of replication upon DNA damage. This study broadens our understanding of TLS in B. subtilis, indicating that there are notable differences in TLS mechanisms across bacteria.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2025

The B. subtilis replicative polymerases bind the sliding clamp with different strengths to tune replication processivity and fidelity

Ring-shaped sliding clamp proteins are essential components of the replication machinery, the replisome, across all domains of life. In bacteria, DNA polymerases bind the sliding clamp, DnaN, through conserved short peptide sequences called clamp-binding motifs. Clamp binding increases the processivity and rate of DNA synthesis and is generally required for polymerase activity. The current understanding of clamp-polymerase interactions was elucidated in the model bacterium Escherichia coli, which has a single replicative polymerase, Pol III. However, many bacteria have two essential replicative polymerases, such as PolC and DnaE in Bacillus subtilis. PolC performs the bulk of DNA synthesis whereas the error-prone DnaE only synthesizes short stretches of DNA on the lagging strand. How the clamp interacts with the two polymerases and coordinates their activity is unknown. We investigated this question by combining in vivo single-molecule fluorescence microscopy with biochemical and microbiological assays. We found that PolC-DnaN binding is essential for replication, although weakening the interaction is tolerated with only minimal effects. In contrast, the DnaE-DnaN interaction is dispensable for replication. Altering the clamp-binding strength of DnaE produces only subtle effects on DnaE cellular localization and dynamics, but it has a substantial impact on mutagenesis. Our results support a model in which DnaE acts distributively during replication but can be stabilized on the DNA template by clamp binding. This study provides new insights into the coordination of multiple replicative polymerases in bacteria and the role of the clamp in polymerase processivity, fidelity, and exchange.

biochemistry↗