Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

O'Malley, S.

Publications and source records attributed to O'Malley, S..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Challenges and Solutions in Quantifying Brain β-Hydroxybutyrate (BHB) with 1H-MRS Following Oral Keto-Ester Consumption

Purpose{beta}-hydroxybutyrate (BHB), a ketone body and alternative cerebral energy substrate, can be measured in vivo using J-difference edited proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS). Oral ketone supplementation with substrates such as the ketone monoester (R)-3-hydroxybutyl-(R)-3-hydroxybutyrate (KME) and 1,3-butanediol (BD) have gained attention as a mechanism to elevate circulating BHB and induce ketosis without dietary restrictions. Elevated brain ketone availability is of growing therapeutic interest as a strategy to support neuronal energetics in conditions such as epilepsy, neurodegenerative disease, and alcohol use disorder (AUD). However, both pathways introduce BD into the bloodstream, which crosses the blood-brain barrier. Critically, BD exhibits a spectral signature that closely resembles the prominent BHB peak in JDE-MR spectroscopic imaging (MRSI), identified in a pilot AUD study. MethodsTwo separate JDE-MRSI acquisitions tailored for BHB and BD editing were implemented, exploiting frequency separation between the BHB (4.14ppm) and BD (3.95ppm) coupling partners of the observed 1.2ppm resonance to independently quantify each metabolite. ResultsBrain BD concentrations (0.25-0.58mM) were comparable to or exceeded corresponding BHB concentrations (0.20-0.27mM) in all volunteers after consumption of a single dose of the KME, indicating that BD constitutes a major fraction of the signal conventionally attributed to BHB. Combined BHB+BD concentrations ([~]0.45-0.85mM) were consistent with brain BHB values reported in prior studies employing similar doses of the KME, indicating that those measurements likely reflect a combined BHB+BD signal. ConclusionsSeparate quantification of the two metabolites is important for interpreting brain ketone studies and for understanding the full pharmacology of KME supplementation.

neuroscience↗

Absence of Sensory Cooling Activity and Cooling Agents from California's New ''Non-Menthol'' Cigarettes Marketed in 2025

BackgroundSince late 2022, the sale of most flavoured tobacco products has been prohibited in California, including menthol cigarettes. Tobacco companies responded by introducing "non-menthol" cigarettes in which menthol was replaced with WS-3, an odorless synthetic cooling agent to elicit cooling sensations similar to menthol. Legislation enacted in 2024 banned the addition of cooling characterizing flavours in tobacco products in California. However, the industry continues to market "non-menthol" cigarettes in the state, with very similar package designs. It is unknown whether these cigarettes contain a cooling agent. MethodsAvailable Newport-branded "non-menthol" cigarettes were purchased in California in 2025, extracted and tested for sensory cooling activity by Ca2+ microfluorimetry of HEK293T cells expressing the human TRPM8 cold/menthol receptor. Chemical analysis was performed by gas chromatography - mass spectrometry (GCMS). "Non-menthol" and menthol cigarettes marketed in 2023-24 served as controls. ResultsExtracts from Newport-branded "non-menthol" cigarettes marketed in California in 2025 did not elicit sensory cooling activity. Chemical analysis confirmed the absence of menthol and any of the major commercial synthetic cooling agents. ConclusionsThe tobacco industry removed sensory cooling agents from "non-menthol" cigarettes marketed in California. However, this did not result in the market withdrawal of "non-menthol" cigarettes in the state. "Non-menthol" cigarettes in California continue to be marketed with package designs resembling those of former menthol cigarettes, signaling the potential presence of a characterising flavour.

pharmacology and toxicology↗

Synthetic Cooling Agent in Oral Nicotine Pouch Products Marketed as "Flavor Ban Approved"

BackgroundUS sales of oral nicotine pouches (ONPs) have rapidly increased, with cool/mint-flavored ONPs the most popular. Restrictions on sales of flavored tobacco products have either been implemented or proposed by several US states and localities. Zyn, the most popular ONP brand, is marketing Zyn-"Chill" and Zyn-"Smooth" as "Flavor-Ban Approved", probably to evade flavor bans. At present it is unclear whether these ONPs are indeed free of flavor additives that can impart pleasant sensations such as cooling. MethodsSensory cooling and irritant activities of "Flavor-Ban Approved" ONPs, Zyn-"Chill" and "Smooth", along with "minty" varieties (Cool Mint, Peppermint, Spearmint, Menthol), were analyzed by Ca2+ microfluorimetry in HEK293 cells expressing the cold/menthol (TRPM8) or menthol/irritant receptor (TRPA1). Flavor chemical content of these ONPs was analyzed by GC/MS. ResultsZyn-"Chill" ONP extracts robustly activated TRPM8, with much higher efficacy (39-53%) than the mint-flavored ONPs. In contrast, mint-flavored ONP extracts elicited stronger TRPA1 irritant receptor responses than Zyn-"Chill" extracts. Chemical analysis demonstrated the presence of WS-3, an odorless synthetic cooling agent, in Zyn-"Chill" and several other mint-flavored Zyn-ONPs ConclusionsSynthetic cooling agents such as WS-3 found in Flavor-Ban Approved Zyn-"Chill" can provide a robust cooling sensation with reduced sensory irritancy, thereby increasing product appeal and use. The label "Flavor-Ban Approved" is misleading and may implicate health benefits. Regulators need to develop effective strategies for the control of odorless sensory additives used by the industry to bypass flavor bans.

pharmacology and toxicology↗