Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Nyakatura, J. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Nyakatura, J. A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Trabecular structure correlates with leaping distance in tamarins

ObjectivesThe intricate trabecular architecture of long-bone epiphyses underpins functional adaptations for diverse mammalian locomotion. Despite extensive study in other mammals, tamarin trabecular structure and fine-grained differences among leaping taxa remain poorly characterized. Materials and MethodsWe examined humeral and tibial trabecular networks in four tamarin species representing short- and long-distance leapers using {micro}CT-scans and a whole-epiphysis approach. We quantified network complexity with topological indices (node density, tortuosity, trabecular length, fractal dimension) alongside traditional metrics (degree of anisotropy [DA], bone volume fraction [BV/TV]) to capture both geometric and topological features. ResultsLong leapers exhibit significantly higher node density in both humeral and tibial epiphyses and increased trabecular tortuosity in the distal humerus. Elevated node density localizes beneath the humero-scapular joint, within the proximal humerus, and in variable regions across other epiphyses. Other parameters (DA, BV/TV, trabecular length, fractal dimension) showed no leaping-related differences, instead correlating with sex and captivity. DiscussionIncreased mechanical strain during longer leaps likely drives higher node density and, to a lesser extent, tortuosity in humeral and tibial epiphyses, with node density showing the strongest functional signal. While sex and captivity influence other trabecular traits, patterns in these key metrics support locomotor adaptation. Integrating whole-epiphysis analyses with novel topological indices enhances detection of subtle functional signals and complements VOI-based and traditional frameworks in comparative trabecular bone studies.

zoology↗

Palaeobiological inferences based on long bone epiphyseal and diaphyseal structure - the forelimb of xenarthrans (Mammalia)

Trabecular architecture (i.e., the main orientation of the bone trabeculae, their number, mean thickness, spacing, etc.) has been shown experimentally to adapt with great accuracy and sensitivity to the loadings applied to the bone during life. However, the potential of trabecular parameters used as a proxy for the mechanical environment of an organisms organ to help reconstruct the lifestyle of extinct taxa has only recently started to be exploited. Furthermore, these parameters are rarely combined to the long-used mid-diaphyseal parameters to inform such reconstructions. Here we investigate xenarthrans, for which functional and ecological reconstructions of extinct forms are particularly important in order to improve our macroevolutionary understanding of their main constitutive clades, i.e., the Tardigrada (sloths), Vermilingua (anteaters), and Cingulata (armadillos and extinct close relatives). The lifestyles of modern xenarthrans can be classified as fully terrestrial and highly fossorial (armadillos), arboreal (partly to fully) and hook-and-pull digging (anteaters), or suspensory (fully arboreal) and non-fossorial (sloths). The degree of arboreality and fossoriality of some extinct forms, \"ground sloths\" in particular, is highly debated. We used high-resolution computed tomography to compare the epiphyseal 3D architecture and mid-diaphyseal structure of the forelimb bones of extant and extinct xenarthrans. The comparative approach employed aims at inferring the most probable lifestyle of extinct taxa, using a phylogenetically informed discriminant analysis. Several challenges preventing the attribution of one of the extant xenarthran lifestyles to the sampled extinct sloths were identified. Differing from that of the larger \"ground sloths\", the bone structure of the small-sized Hapalops (Miocene of Argentina), however, was found as significantly more similar to that of extant sloths, even when accounting for the phylogenetic signal.

paleontology↗