Biology subjects

Novikov, E.

Publications and source records attributed to Novikov, E..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2023

Quality Control for Single Cell Analysis of High-plex Tissue Profiles using CyLinter

Tumors are complex assemblies of cellular and acellular structures patterned on spatial scales from microns to centimeters. Study of these assemblies has advanced dramatically with the introduction of high-plex spatial profiling. Image-based profiling methods reveal the intensities and spatial distributions of 20-100 proteins at subcellular resolution in 103-107 cells per specimen. Despite extensive work on methods for extracting single-cell data from these images, all tissue images contain artefacts such as folds, debris, antibody aggregates, optical aberrations and image processing errors that arise from imperfections in specimen preparation, data acquisition, image assembly, and feature extraction. We show that these artefacts dramatically impact single-cell data analysis, obscuring meaningful biological interpretation. We describe an interactive quality control software tool, CyLinter, that identifies and removes data associated with imaging artefacts. CyLinter greatly improves single-cell analysis, especially for archival specimens sectioned many years prior to data collection, such as those from clinical trials.

pathology↗

bioRxiv2021

UnMICST: Deep learning with real augmentation for robust segmentation of highly multiplexed images of human tissues

Newly developed technologies have made it feasible to routinely collect highly multiplexed (20-60 channel) images at subcellular resolution from human tissues for research and diagnostic purposes. Extracting single cell data from such images requires efficient and accurate image segmentation, a challenging problem that has recently benefited from the use of deep learning. In this paper, we demonstrate two approaches to improving tissue segmentation that are applicable to multiple deep learning frameworks. The first uses "real augmentations" that comprise defocused and saturated image data collected on the same instruments as the actual data; using real augmentation improves model accuracy to a significantly greater degree than computational augmentation (Gaussian blurring). The second involves imaging the nuclear envelope to better identify nuclear outlines. The two approaches cumulatively and substantially improve segmentation on a wide range of tissue types and provide a set of improved segmentation models. We speculate that the use of real augmentations may have applications in image processing outside of microscopy.

bioinformatics↗