Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Noske, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Noske, J..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Predicting single mutation effects on binding affinity at protein-protein interfaces based on MMPBSA calculations

Accurate prediction of mutation-induced changes in protein-protein affinity remains a central challenge in computational biophysics and protein engineering. Here we present a physics-based scoring method for predicting the effects of single amino acid substitutions on protein-protein and protein-peptide binding affinity. The method is based on MMPBSA energy calculations and implemented in a user-friendly, publicly available workflow (https://github.com/Hoecker-Lab/mmpbsa_scoring). To derive the scoring function, MMPBSA energy terms were fitted using a large and diverse dataset of experimentally measured binding affinity changes upon point mutation. The terms were then evaluated on independent systems. Specifically, we assessed the ability to predict mutational effects at the interface of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein with its cellular receptor, as well as computationally predicted Armadillo-repeat protein-peptide complexes. The approach performs well across diverse targets and shows promising predictive performance on both experimentally determined and computationally predicted structures. It matches or exceeds the accuracy of established physics-based protein design software and state-of-the-art deep learning-based scoring functions when applied to data outside their training domain. The method provides a computationally efficient and interpretable framework for prioritizing interface mutations in protein engineering and binding affinity optimization.

bioinformatics↗

Complementary evaluation of computational methods for predicting single residue effects on peptide binding specificities

Understanding the interactions that make up protein-protein or protein-peptide interfaces is a crucial step towards applications in biotechnology. The ability to discriminate between different partners defines the specificity of a binding protein and is equally important as its affinity to the target. Whereas many established computational methods provide an estimate of binding or non-binding, comparing similar ligands is still significantly more challenging. Here we evaluated the capability of predicting ligand binding specificity using three established but conceptually different physics-based methods for protein design. As a model system, we analyzed the binding of peptides to designed armadillo repeat proteins, where a single residue of the peptide was changed systematically, and compared the results with an experimental reference data set. The mutation of a single residue can have a strong impact on binding affinity and specificity, which is difficult to capture in sampling and scoring. We critically assessed the prediction accuracy of the computational methods and found that the prediction performance of each method is differently affected, suggesting the use of a complementary approach of the evaluated methods. Author SummaryProteins have to recognize other proteins and peptides in the cell with high specificity. To be able to predict such interactions with high precision would be immensely useful for medical and biotechnological applications. Here we tested three computational methods that use physics-based force fields on an experimental dataset and evaluated how well these predictions can be used to discriminate binding pockets on a single residue level. The predicted values of each method and the experimentally determined specificities correlated well, even though each approach had its biases. Therefore, we correlated the predictions with each other to complement the strengths and weaknesses of all approaches.

bioinformatics↗

Protlego: A Python package for the analysis and design of chimeric proteins

MotivationGene duplication and recombination of protein fragments have led to the highly diverse protein space that we observe today. By mimicking this natural process, the design of protein chimeras via fragment recombination has proven experimentally successful and has opened a new era for the design of customizable proteins. The in-silico building of structural models for these chimeric proteins, however, remains a manual task that requires a considerable degree of expertise and is not amenable for high-throughput studies. Energetic and structural analysis of the designed proteins often require the use of several tools, each with their unique technical difficulties and available in different programming languages or web servers. ResultsWe have implemented a Python package that enables automated, high-throughput design of chimeras and their structural analysis. First, it is possible to fetch evolutionarily conserved fragments from a built-in database (also available at fuzzle.uni-bayreuth.de). These relationships can then be represented via networks or further selected for chimera construction via recombination. Designed chimeras or natural proteins are then scored and minimised with the Charmm and Amber forcefields and their diverse structural features can be analysed at ease. Here, we showcase Protlegos pipeline by exploring the relationships between the P-loop and Rossmann superfolds and building and characterising their offspring chimeras. We believe that Protlego provides a powerful new tool for the protein design community. Availability and implementationProtlego is freely available at (https://hoecker-lab.github.io/protlego/) with tutorials and documentation.

bioinformatics↗