Biology subjects

Nordvik, J. E.

Publications and source records attributed to Nordvik, J. E..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2018

Genetic control of variability in subcortical and intracranial volumes

Sensitivity to external demands is essential for adaptation to dynamic environments, but comes at the cost of increased risk of adverse outcomes when facing poor environmental conditions. Here, we apply a novel methodology to perform genome-wide association analysis of mean and variance in nine key brain features (accumbens, amygdala, caudate, hippocampus, pallidum, putamen, thalamus, intracranial volume and cortical thickness), integrating genetic and neuroanatomical data from a large lifespan sample (n=25,575 individuals; 8 to 89 years, mean age 51.9 years). We identify genetic loci associated with phenotypic variability in cortical thickness, thalamus, pallidum, and intracranial volumes. The variance-controlling loci included genes with a documented role in brain and mental health and were not associated with the mean anatomical volumes. This proof-of-principle of the hypothesis of a genetic regulation of brain volume variability contributes to establishing the genetic basis of phenotypic variance (i.e., heritability), allows identifying different degrees of brain robustness across individuals, and opens new research avenues in the search for mechanisms controlling brain and mental health.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

Cross-sectional and longitudinal brain scans reveal accelerated brain aging in multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory disorder of the central nervous system. By combining longitudinal MRI-based brain morphometry and brain age estimation using machine learning, we tested the hypothesis that MS patients have higher brain age relative to chronological age than healthy controls (HC) and that longitudinal rate of brain aging in MS patients is associated with clinical course.\n\nSeventy-six MS patients, 71 % females and mean age 34.8 years (range 21-49) at inclusion, were examined with brain MRI at three time points with a mean total follow up period of 4.4 years. A machine learning model was applied on an independent training set of 3208 HC, estimating individual brain age and calculating the difference between estimated brain age and chronological age, termed brain age gap (BAG). We also assessed the longitudinal change rate in BAG in MS individuals. We used additional cross-sectional MRI data from 235 HC for case-control comparison.\n\nMS patients showed increased BAG (4.4 {+/-}6.6 years) compared to HC (Cohens D = 0.69, p = 4.0 x 10-6). Longitudinal estimates of BAG in MS patients suggested an accelerated rate of brain aging corresponding to an annual increase of 0.41 ({+/-}1.23) years compared to chronological aging for the MS patients (p = 0.008).\n\nOn average, patients with MS have significantly higher BAG compared to HC and accelerated rate of brain aging compared to chronological aging. Brain age estimation represents a promising method for evaluation of brain changes in MS, with potential for predicting future outcome and guide treatment.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

Assessing distinct patterns of cognitive aging using tissue-specific brain age prediction based on diffusion tensor imaging and brain morphometry

Multimodal imaging enables sensitive measures of the architecture and integrity of the human brain, but the high-dimensional nature of advanced brain imaging features poses inherent challenges for the analyses and interpretations. Multivariate age prediction reduces the dimensionality to one biologically informative summary measure with potential for assessing deviations from normal lifespan trajectories. A number of studies documented remarkably accurate age prediction, but the differential age trajectories and the cognitive sensitivity of distinct brain tissue classes have to a lesser extent been characterized.\n\nExploring differential brain age models driven by tissue-specific classifiers provides a hitherto unexplored opportunity to disentangle independent sources of heterogeneity in brain biology. We trained machine-learning models to estimate brain age using various combinations of FreeSurfer based morphometry and diffusion tensor imaging based indices of white matter microstructure in 612 healthy controls aged 18-87 years. To compare the tissue- specific brain ages and their cognitive sensitivity we applied each of the 11 models in an independent and cognitively well-characterized sample (n=265, 20-88 years). Correlations between true and estimated age in our test sample were highest for the most comprehensive brain morphometry (r=0.83, CI:0.78-0.86) and white matter microstructure (r=0.79, CI:0.74-0.83) models, confirming sensitivity and generalizability. The deviance from the chronological age were sensitive to performance on several cognitive tests for various models, including spatial Stroop and symbol coding, indicating poorer performance in individuals with an over-estimated age. Tissue-specific brain age models provide sensitive measures of brain integrity, with implications for the study of a range of brain disorders.

neuroscience↗