Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Nora, E. P.

Publications and source records attributed to Nora, E. P..

15 recordsLinked to original sources

The ChIP-FRiP pipeline quantifies co-binding and reveals how antibody background contributes to cohesin ChIP-seq patterns

Loop extruding cohesin complexes are positioned by CTCF barriers to generate locus-specific 3D genome folding patterns. Quantifying cohesin accumulation at CTCF sites is crucial for deriving insight into loop extrusion and its consequences. Here we confronted expectations from loop extrusion simulations with experimental data by developing a pipeline, ChIP-FRiP, and analysis framework to reliably quantify cohesin positioning. We used ChIP-FRiP to uniformly re-process 140 cohesin ChIP-seq datasets from 13 publicly available studies. This analysis revealed that non-specific antibody binding can skew measurements of cohesin positioning. To mitigate this bias, we developed a biochemical model of background ChIP-seq signal and a strategy to estimate and correct this background using spike-in ChIP-seq data and relative protein abundance before and after depletion. Our results establish a framework for comparative analysis, demonstrating that accurate background correction is requisite for interpreting the roles of cohesin cofactors in cohesin positioning.

genomics↗

The role of cohesin loading at enhancers in the flux of loop extrusion and long-range transcriptional control

Enhancers have been proposed to act as privileged loading sites for cohesin, raising the idea that they actively fold the genome to engage distal target promoters for transcription. Supporting this idea, NIPBL/MAU2, which is required for cohesin loading, binds at enhancers in mouse embryonic stem cells. However, we find that driving cohesin recruitment near an enhancer strongly inhibits transcription from its target distal promoter, indicating that strong focal cohesin loading at enhancers is not compatible with their long-range regulatory functions. Quantitative experiments and biophysical modeling further indicate that cohesin loading at enhancers does not make major contributions to genome-wide cohesin binding and chromosome folding patterns. Instead, cohesin must load throughout the genome to extrude it, regardless of enhancer proximity, with the major determinants of cohesin traffic being extrusion barriers such as transcription and clustered CTCF sites. These findings indicate that enhancer function is largely ancillary to the general mechanisms of chromosome folding, informing further study of the relationship between genome architecture and transcriptional regulation.

molecular biology↗

NIPBL dosage shapes genome folding by tuning the rate of cohesin loop extrusion

Genome folding is not static, but emerges from dynamic processes that control transcription, replication, recombination, and repair. DNA loop extrusion by cohesin is central to genome organization, yet it remains unclear how cells can tune extrusion kinetics to achieve precise and functional chromosome folding patterns. Here we discover extrusion rate acts as a tunable biophysical parameter in cells, quantitatively dialed by the respective dosage of the cohesin cofactors NIPBL and PDS5. Modulation of extrusion rate can offset changes in cohesin lifetime to buffer steady-state chromosome structure and transcriptional states, even in the face of abnormal extrusion dynamics. These findings provide a long-sought mechanistic basis for the genetic interactions between cohesin cofactors and the molecular origin of haploinsufficiency in cohesinopathies, such as Cornelia de Lange syndrome.

molecular biology↗

Synergy between cis-regulatory elements can render cohesin dispensable for distal enhancer function

Enhancers are critical genetic elements controlling transcription from promoters, but the mechanisms by which they convey regulatory information across large genomic distances remain elusive. Here, we engineered pluripotent stem cells in which cohesin loop extrusion can be inducibly disrupted without causing confounding cell cycle defects. While evident, transcriptional dysregulation was cell-type specific, and not all loci with distal enhancers depend equally on cohesin extrusion. Using comparative genome editing, we demonstrate that enhancer-promoter communication across as little as 20 kilobases can rely on cohesin. However, promoter-proximal regulatory elements can support long-range, cohesin-independent enhancer action - either upon disabling extrusion or across strong CTCF insulators. Finally, transcriptional dynamics and the emergence of new embryonic cell types in response to differentiation cues remained largely robust to disrupting cohesin extrusion. Beyond establishing novel experimental strategies to study cohesin functions in enhancer biology, our work provides mechanistic insight accounting for both cell type- and genomic context-specificity.

molecular biology↗

Brain and cancer associated binding domain mutations provide insight into CTCF's relationship with chromatin and its ability to act as a chromatin organizer

Here we used a series of CTCF mutations to explore CTCFs relationship with chromatin and its contribution to gene regulation. CTCFs impact depends on the genomic context of bound sites and the unique binding properties of WT and mutant CTCF proteins. Specifically, CTCFs signal strength is linked to changes in accessibility, and the ability to block cohesin is linked to its binding stability. Multivariate modelling reveals that both CTCF and accessibility contribute independently to cohesin binding and insulation, however CTCF signal strength has a stronger effect. CTCF and chromatin have a bidirectional relationship such that at CTCF sites, accessibility is reduced in a cohesin-dependent, mutant specific fashion. In addition, each mutant alters TF binding and accessibility in an indirect manner, changes which impart the most influence on rewiring transcriptional networks and the cells ability to differentiate. Collectively, the mutant perturbations provide a rich resource for determining CTCFs site-specific effects.

molecular biology↗

The single-molecule accessibility landscape of newly replicated mammalian chromatin

The higher-order structure of newly replicated (i.e. nascent) chromatin fibers remains poorly-resolved, limiting our understanding of how epigenomes are maintained across cell divisions. To address this, we present Replication-Aware Single-molecule Accessibility Mapping (RASAM), a long-read sequencing method that nondestructively measures genome-wide replication-status and protein-DNA interactions simultaneously on intact chromatin templates. We report that individual human and mouse nascent chromatin fibers are hyperaccessible compared to steady-state chromatin. This hyperaccessibility occurs at two, coupled length-scales: first, individual nucleosome core particles on nascent DNA exist as a mixture of partially-unwrapped nucleosomes and other subnucleosomal species; second, newly-replicated chromatin fibers are significantly enriched for irregularly-spaced nucleosomes on individual DNA molecules. Focusing on specific cis-regulatory elements (e.g. transcription factor binding sites; active transcription start sites [TSSs]), we discover unique modes by which nascent chromatin hyperaccessibility is resolved at the single-molecule level: at CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) binding sites, CTCF and nascent nucleosomes compete for motifs on nascent chromatin fibers, resulting in quantitatively-reduced CTCF occupancy and motif accessibility post-replication; at active TSSs, high levels of steady-state chromatin accessibility are preserved, implying that nucleosome free regions (NFRs) are rapidly re-established behind the fork. Our study introduces a new paradigm for studying higher-order chromatin fiber organization behind the replication fork. More broadly, we uncover a unique organization of newly replicated chromatin that must be reset by active processes, providing a substrate for epigenetic reprogramming.

genomics↗

Live-cell imaging and physical modeling reveal control of chromosome folding dynamics by cohesin and CTCF

Physical proximity between genomic sequences in mammalian chromosomes controls key biological processes such as transcriptional regulation and DNA repair. Yet it is currently unknown if chromosomal contacts are rare and stable or instead frequent and dynamic, and how they depend on the loop extrusion activity of cohesin or barriers such as CTCF. By imaging chromosomal locations at high spatial and temporal resolution over several hours in living cells, we show that sequences within topological associating domains (TADs) frequently come into physical proximity during the course of a cell cycle and remain close to each other only for a few minutes. Such contacts become nonetheless substantially longer and more frequent in the presence of convergent CTCF sites, resulting in a suppression of variability in chromosome folding in single cells across time. Supported by physical models of chromosome dynamics, our data additionally suggests that individual CTCF-anchored loops last around 10 minutes. The estimates of chromosomal contact dynamics in our study provide a novel quantitative framework to link chromosome structure to function and show that cohesin and CTCF stabilize otherwise highly dynamic chromosome structures to facilitate selected subsets of chromosomal interactions.

molecular biology↗

Inversion of a topological domain leads to restricted changes in its gene expression and affects inter-domain communication

The interplay between the topological organization of the genome and the regulation of gene expression remains unclear. Depletion of molecular factors underlying genome topology, such as CTCF and cohesin, leads to modest alterations in gene expression, while genomic rearrangements involving boundaries of topologically associating domains (TADs) disrupt normal gene expression and can lead to pathological phenotypes. Here we inverted an almost entire TAD (245kb out of 300kb) within the X-inactivation centre (Xic), leaving its boundaries intact. This led to a significant rearrangement of topological contacts within the TAD, mostly in accordance to the orientation of underlying CTCF binding sites but suggesting heterogeneity in the "contact" potential of different CTCF sites. The inversion also led to increased contact insulation with the neighbouring TAD. Expression of most genes within the inverted TAD remained unaffected in mouse embryonic stem cells and during differentiation. Interestingly, expression in the neighbouring TAD of the noncoding transcript Xist, which controls X-chromosome inactivation, was ectopically upregulated. The same inversion in mouse embryos led to a bias in Xist expression, but X-inactivation choice ratios did not significantly deviate from wild type. Smaller deletions and inversions of specific clusters of CTCF sites within the TAD led to similar results: rearrangement of contacts, limited changes in local gene expression but significant changes in Xist expression. Our study suggests that the wiring of regulatory interactions within a TAD can influence the expression of genes in neighbouring TADs, highlighting the existence of mechanisms for inter-TAD communication.

genomics↗

Defining the relative and combined contribution of CTCF and CTCFL to genomic regulation

BackgroundUbiquitously expressed CTCF is involved in numerous cellular functions, such as organizing chromatin into TAD structures. In contrast, its paralog, CTCFL is normally only present in testis. However, it is also aberrantly expressed in many cancers. While it is known that shared and unique zinc finger sequences in CTCF and CTCFL enable CTCFL to bind competitively to a subset of CTCF binding sites as well as its own unique locations, the impact of CTCFL on chromosome organization and gene expression has not been comprehensively analyzed in the context of CTCF function. Using an inducible complementation system, we analyze the impact of expressing CTCFL and CTCF-CTCFL chimeric proteins in the presence or absence of endogenous CTCF to clarify the relative and combined contribution of CTCF and CTCFL to chromosome organization and transcription. ResultsWe demonstrate that the N terminus of CTCF interacts with cohesin which explains the requirement for convergent CTCF binding sites in loop formation. By analyzing CTCF and CTCFL binding in tandem we identify phenotypically distinct sites with respect to motifs, targeting to promoter/intronic intergenic regions and chromatin folding. Finally, we reveal that the N, C and zinc finger terminal domains play unique roles in targeting each paralog to distinct binding sites, to regulate transcription, chromatin looping and insulation. ConclusionThis study clarifies the unique and combined contribution of CTCF and CTCFL to chromosome organization and transcription, with direct implications for understanding how their co-expression deregulates transcription in cancer.

genomics↗

Molecular basis of CTCF binding polarity in genome folding

Current models propose that boundaries of mammalian topologically associating domains (TADs) arise from the ability of the CTCF protein to stop extrusion of chromatin loops by cohesin proteins (Merkenschlager & Nora, 2016; Fudenberg, Abdennur, Imakaev, Goloborodko, & Mirny, 2017). While the orientation of CTCF motifs determines which pairs of CTCF sites preferentially stabilize DNA loops (de Wit et al., 2015; Guo et al., 2015; Rao et al., 2014; Vietri Rudan et al., 2015), the molecular basis of this polarity remains mysterious. Here we report that CTCF positions cohesin but does not control its overall binding or dynamics on chromatin by single molecule live imaging. Using an inducible complementation system, we found that CTCF mutants lacking the N-terminus cannot insulate TADs properly, despite normal binding. Cohesin remained at CTCF sites in this mutant, albeit with reduced enrichment. Given that the orientation of the CTCF motif presents the CTCF N-terminus towards cohesin as it translocates from the interior of TADs, these observations provide a molecular explanation for how the polarity of CTCF binding sites determines the genomic distribution of chromatin loops.

molecular biology↗

WAPL maintains dynamic cohesin to preserve lineage specific distal gene regulation

The cohesin complex plays essential roles in sister chromatin cohesin, chromosome organization and gene expression. The role of cohesin in gene regulation is incompletely understood. Here, we report that the cohesin release factor WAPL is crucial for maintaining a pool of dynamic cohesin bound to regions that are associated with lineage specific genes in mouse embryonic stem cells. These regulatory regions are enriched for active enhancer marks and transcription factor binding sites, but largely devoid of CTCF binding sites. Stabilization of cohesin, which leads to a loss of dynamic cohesin from these regions, does not affect transcription factor binding or active enhancer marks, but does result in changes in promoter-enhancer interactions and downregulation of genes. Acute cohesin depletion can phenocopy the effect of WAPL depletion, showing that cohesin plays a crucial role in maintaining expression of lineage specific genes. The binding of dynamic cohesin to chromatin is dependent on the pluripotency transcription factor OCT4, but not NANOG. Finally, dynamic cohesin binding sites are also found in differentiated cells, suggesting that they represent a general regulatory principle. We propose that cohesin dynamically binding to regulatory sites creates a favorable spatial environment in which promoters and enhancers can communicate to ensure proper gene expression.\n\nHIGHLIGHTSO_LIThe cohesin release factor WAPL is crucial for maintaining a pluripotency-specific phenotype.\nC_LIO_LIDynamic cohesin is enriched at lineage specific loci and overlaps with binding sites of pluripotency transcription factors.\nC_LIO_LIExpression of lineage specific genes is maintained by dynamic cohesin binding through the formation of promoter-enhancer associated self-interaction domains.\nC_LIO_LICTCF-independent cohesin binding to chromatin is controlled by the pioneer factor OCT4.\nC_LI

genomics↗

CTCF confers local nucleosome resiliency after DNA replication and during mitosis

The access of Transcription Factors (TFs) to their cognate DNA binding motifs requires a precise control over nucleosome posi-tioning. This is especially important following DNA replication and during mitosis, both resulting in profound changes in nu-cleosome organization over TF binding regions. Using mouse Embryonic Stem (ES) cells, we show that the TF CTCF displaces nucleosomes from its binding site and locally organizes large and phased nucleosomal arrays, not only in interphase steady-state but also immediately after replication and during mitosis. While regions bound by other TFs, such as Oct4 and Sox2, display major rearrangement, the post-replication and mitotic nucleosome organization activity of CTCF is not likely to be unique: Esrrb binding regions are also characterized by persistent nucleosome positioning. Therefore, we propose that selected TFs, such as CTCF and Esrrb, govern the inheritance of nucleosome positioning at gene regulatory regions through-out the ES cell-cycle.

genomics↗

RNA interactions with CTCF are essential for its proper function

The function of the CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) in the organization of the genome has become an important area of investigation, but the mechanisms of how CTCF dynamically contributes to genome organization is not clear. We previously discovered that CTCF binds to large numbers of endogenous RNAs; promoting its oligomerization. Here we found that inhibition of transcription or interfering with CTCF ability to bind RNA through mutations of two of its 11 zinc fingers that are not involved with CTCF binding to its cognate site in vitro, zinc finger-1 (ZF1) or -10 (ZF10), disrupt CTCF association to chromatin. These mutations alter gene expression profiles as CTCF mutants lose their ability to promote local insulation. Our results highlight the importance of RNA as a structural component of the genome, in part by affecting the association of CTCF with chromatin and likely its interaction with other factors. O_LITranscriptional inhibition disrupts CTCF binding to chromatin C_LIO_LIRNA-binding regions (RBR) in CTCF are found within ZF1 and ZF10 C_LIO_LILocal insulation is markedly decreased in ZF1{triangleup} and ZF10{triangleup} mutant rescues C_LIO_LIGene expression and chromatin organization are disrupted by RBR mutants C_LI

molecular biology↗

Identification of cis elements for spatio-temporal control of DNA replication

The temporal order of DNA replication (replication timing, RT) is highly coupled with genome architecture, but cis-elements regulating spatio-temporal control of replication have remained elusive. We performed an extensive series of CRISPR mediated deletions and inversions and high-resolution capture Hi-C of a pluripotency associated domain (DppA2/4) in mouse embryonic stem cells. Whereas CTCF mediated loops and chromatin domain boundaries were dispensable, deletion of three intra-domain prominent CTCF-independent 3D contact sites caused a domain-wide delay in RT, shift in sub-nuclear chromatin compartment and loss of transcriptional activity, These \"early replication control elements\" (ERCEs) display prominent chromatin features resembling enhancers/promoters and individual and pair-wise deletions of the ERCEs confirmed their partial redundancy and interdependency in controlling domain-wide RT and transcription. Our results demonstrate that discrete cis-regulatory elements mediate domain-wide RT, chromatin compartmentalization, and transcription, representing a major advance in dissecting the relationship between genome structure and function.\n\nHighlightsO_LIcis-elements (ERCEs) regulate large scale chromosome structure and function\nC_LIO_LIMultiple ERCEs cooperatively control domain-wide replication\nC_LIO_LIERCEs harbor prominent active chromatin features and form CTCF-independent loops\nC_LIO_LIERCEs enable genetic dissection of large-scale chromosome structure-function.\nC_LI

molecular biology↗

Targeted degradation of CTCF decouples local insulation of chromosome domains from higher-order genomic compartmentalization

The molecular mechanisms underlying folding of mammalian chromosomes remain poorly understood. The transcription factor CTCF is a candidate regulator of chromosomal structure. Using the auxin-inducible degron system in mouse embryonic stem cells, we show that CTCF is absolutely and dose-dependently required for looping between CTCF target sites and segmental organization into topologically associating domains (TADs). Restoring CTCF reinstates proper architecture on altered chromosomes, indicating a powerful instructive function for CTCF in chromatin folding, and CTCF remains essential for TAD organization in non-dividing cells. Surprisingly, active and inactive genome compartments remain properly segregated upon CTCF depletion, revealing that compartmentalization of mammalian chromosomes emerges independently of proper insulation of TADs. Further, our data supports that CTCF mediates transcriptional insulator function through enhancer-blocking but not direct chromatin barrier activity. These results define the functions of CTCF in chromosome folding, and provide new fundamental insights into the rules governing mammalian genome organization.\n\n\n\nO_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=178 SRC=\"FIGDIR/small/095802_ufig1.gif\" ALT=\"Figure 1\">\nView larger version (49K):\norg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@79c6c5org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e8e61forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@5c2eedorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@cf7f3_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

genomics↗