Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Nishijima, H.

Publications and source records attributed to Nishijima, H..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Isolation of bacteria that catabolize abiotically synthesized tetroses via the formose reaction

Sugars synthesized through abiotic processes, specifically the formose reaction, are promising candidates for next-generation feedstocks for biomanufacturing due to their significantly higher productivity compared to cultivated crops. One of the significant challenges associated with the utilization of abiotically synthesized sugars via the formose reaction is the presence of unusual sugars, which are not metabolized by typical microorganisms. This study aimed to identify microorganisms capable of catabolizing tetroses, which are among the unusual sugars present in the abiotically synthesized sugars. Four model bacteria commonly used in biomanufacturing, including Escherichia coli, were unable to catabolize tetroses and their growth was completely inhibited by 2 to 4 g/L of D-erythrose or 0.5 to 1 g/L of L-erythrulose. We successfully isolated eight phylogenetically diverse bacterial strains from river sediments, capable of utilizing D-erythrose and L-erythrulose as the sole carbon sources. These isolates exhibited higher tolerances to tetroses compared to the model bacteria. The isolates exhibited the ability to grow in high concentrations of the abiotically synthesized sugars, which inhibit the growth of typical microorganisms, and to consume tetroses contained therein. Further investigation into the molecular mechanisms of tetrose metabolisms in the isolates will facilitate the development of biomanufacturing processes utilizing the abiotically synthesized sugars.

microbiology↗

Delayed SARS-CoV-2 Spread and Olfactory Cell Lineage Impairment in Close-Contact Infection Syrian Hamster Models

ObjectivesClose contact with patients with COVID-19 is speculated to be the most common cause of viral transmission, but the pathogenesis of COVID-19 by close contact remains to be elucidated. In addition, despite olfactory impairment being a unique complication of COVID-19, the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on the olfactory cell lineage has not been fully validated. This study aimed to elucidate close-contact viral transmission to the nose and lungs and to investigate the temporal damage in the olfactory receptor neuron (ORN) lineage caused by SARS-CoV-2. MethodsSyrian hamsters were orally administered SARS-CoV-2 as direct-infection models. On day 7 after inoculation, infected and uninfected hamsters were housed in the same cage for 30 minutes. These uninfected hamsters were subsequently assigned to a close-contact group. First, viral presence in the nose and lungs was verified in the infection and close-contact groups at several time points. Next, the impacts on the olfactory epithelium, including olfactory progenitors, immature ORNs, and mature ORNs, were examined histologically. Then, the viral transmission status and chronological changes in tissue damage were compared between the direct-infection and close-contact groups. ResultsIn the close-contact group, viral presence could not be detected in both the nose and lungs on day 3, and the virus was identified in both tissues on day 7. In the direct-infection group, the viral load was highest in the nose and lungs on day 3, decreased on day 7, and was no longer detectable on day 14. Histologically, in the direct-infection group, mature ORNs were most depleted on day 3 (p < 0.001) and showed a recovery trend on day 14, with similar trends for olfactory progenitors and immature ORNs. In the close-contact group, there was no obvious tissue damage on day 3, but on day 7, the number of all ORN lineage cells significantly decreased (p < 0.001). ConclusionSARS-CoV-2 was transmitted even after brief contact and subsequent olfactory epithelium and lung damage occurred more than 3 days after the trigger of infection. The present study also indicated that SARS-CoV-2 damages all ORN lineage cells, but this damage can begin to recover approximately 14 days post infection.

microbiology↗