Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Nippert, J. B.

Publications and source records attributed to Nippert, J. B..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

The PSInet Plant Water Potential Database: advancing new perspectives on plant water status, traits, and hydraulic processes

Water potential gradients drive water flow within and between soils and plants, and the internal plant water potential controls a wide range of physiological processes including photosynthesis, growth, and mortality. Notwithstanding this clear relevance for many critical aspects of ecosystem function, water potential data have historically been relatively inaccessible and unnetworked. The absence of a centralized repository for plant water potential time series limits our ability to integrate a wealth of ecophysiological information from other networks and from remote sensing. Closing this gap is necessary to address unresolved questions about plant responses to drought and heat stress, and to make confident predictions about plant and ecosystem function in a warming world. Here, we introduce the PSInet database -- a global collection of plant water potential time series from 285 datasets representing 523 species. We present the workflow that guided database development and evaluate its key features. Through a series of preliminary analyses, we then highlight the potential of the PSInet database for applications including: a) advancing plant water use strategy frameworks; b) disentangling the impacts of soil versus atmospheric drought stress; c) assessing the long-held assumption of pre-dawn equilibration of ecosystem water potential; d) understanding the risk of drought-driven mortality; and e) benchmarking remote-sensing data products and land-surface models.

plant biology↗

Physiological responses to drought stress and recovery reflect differences in leaf function and anatomy among grass lineages

Grasses are cosmopolitan, existing in many biome and climate types from xeric to tropical. Traits that control physiological responses to drought vary strongly among grass lineages, suggesting that tolerance strategies may differ with evolutionary history. Here, we withheld water from 12 species representing six tribes of grasses to compare how species respond to drought in different grass lineages. We measured physiological, morphological, and anatomical traits. Dominant lineages from tropical savannas, like Andropogoneae, tolerated drought due to above and belowground morphological traits (specific leaf area and root length, SLA and SRL), while temperate grasses in this study utilized conservative leaf physiology (gas exchange) and anatomy traits. Increased intrinsic water-use efficiency coincided with a larger number of stomata, resulting in greater water loss (with inherently greater carbon gain) and increased drought sensitivity. Inherent leaf and root economic strategies impacting drought response were observed in all species, resulting in either high SLA or SRL, but not both. Our results indicate that grasses subjected to severe drought were influenced by anatomical traits (e.g., number of stomata and xylem area) and similar within lineages. In addition, grasses recovered at least 50% of physiological functioning across all lineages and 92% within Andropogoneae species, illustrating how drought can influence functional responses across diverse grass lineages.

plant biology↗